Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 11/2016

01-11-2016 | Original Contributions

Usefulness of Baltasar’s expected body mass index as an indicator of bariatric weight loss surgery

Authors: Alicia Molina López, Fàtima Sabench Pereferrer, Margarida Vives Espelta, Anna Bonada Sanjaume, Santiago Blanco Blasco, Esther Raga Carceller, Mercè Hernández González, Antonio Sánchez Marín, Jordi Salas Salvadó, Daniel Del Castillo Déjardin

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Determining the best indicator to report weight loss takes on special relevance following bariatric surgery. Our objective is to apply a method proposed by Baltasar et al. to express weight loss results following bariatric surgery.

Materials and methods

Anthropometric data were collected from 265 patients who had undergone Sleeve gastrectomy (SG, n = 172) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP, n = 93) with a 2-year follow-up period. Initial BMI was calculated as well as BMI 2 years after, percentage of excess BMI loss (PEBMIL), expected BMI (EBMI), and corrected PEBMIL.

Results

In SG group, average BMI 2 years after surgery fell within a 95 % CI of expected BMI, with an average BMI of 31.58 ± 4.05 kg/m2 in 35–45 BMI group, an average BMI of 33.62 ± 4.96 kg/m2 in 45–55 BMI group, and an average BMI of 37.40 ± 5.93 kg/m2 in 55–65 BMI group. In RYGBP group, average BMI 2 years after the surgery was below than average expected BMI (28.76 ± 3.20 kg/m2 in 35–45 BMI group and 29.71 ± 3.30 kg/m2 in 45–55 BMI group). Results are considered excellent for the group with an initial BMI of above 45 kg/m2.

Conclusions

EBMI is a good weight loss indicator, mainly when 95 % CI is taken into account. EBMI is consistent with the results obtained 2 years after surgery in our patients who underwent SG and RYGBP. Corrected PEBMIL is a good indicator for expressing the percentage of BMI loss and offers more realistic values than conventional formula with a cut-off point of 25 points.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Kim J, el Chaar M, et al. ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):489–506.CrossRefPubMed Brethauer SA, Kim J, el Chaar M, et al. ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):489–506.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference 1983 Metropolitan height and weight tables. New York: Metropolitan Life Foundation. Statistical Bulletin 1983;64(1):2–9. 1983 Metropolitan height and weight tables. New York: Metropolitan Life Foundation. Statistical Bulletin 1983;64(1):2–9.
3.
go back to reference Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;17(5):565–8. Review. Erratum in: Obes Surg. 2007 Jul;17(7):996.CrossRefPubMed Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;17(5):565–8. Review. Erratum in: Obes Surg. 2007 Jul;17(7):996.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Alastrue A, Sitges A, Jaurrieta E, et al. Valoración de los parámetros antropométricos en nuestra población. Med Clin (Barc). 1982;78:407–15. Alastrue A, Sitges A, Jaurrieta E, et al. Valoración de los parámetros antropométricos en nuestra población. Med Clin (Barc). 1982;78:407–15.
5.
go back to reference Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM. Criteria for definition of overweight in transition: background and recommendations for the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(5):1074–81.PubMed Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM. Criteria for definition of overweight in transition: background and recommendations for the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(5):1074–81.PubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Baltasar A, Bou R, Del Rio J, et al. Cirugía bariátrica: resultados a largo plazo de la gastroplastia vertical anillada. ¿una esperanza frustrada? Cir Esp. 1997;62:175–9. Baltasar A, Bou R, Del Rio J, et al. Cirugía bariátrica: resultados a largo plazo de la gastroplastia vertical anillada. ¿una esperanza frustrada? Cir Esp. 1997;62:175–9.
8.
go back to reference Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377:557–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377:557–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Baltasar A, Serra C, Bou R, et al. Expected body mass index after bariatric surgeryss. Cir Esp. 2009;86(5):308–12.CrossRefPubMed Baltasar A, Serra C, Bou R, et al. Expected body mass index after bariatric surgeryss. Cir Esp. 2009;86(5):308–12.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Baltasar A, Perez N, Serra C, et al. Weight loss reporting: predicted body mass index after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21(3):367–72.CrossRefPubMed Baltasar A, Perez N, Serra C, et al. Weight loss reporting: predicted body mass index after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21(3):367–72.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Van de Laar AW, Dollé MH, de Brauw LM, et al. Which baseline weight should be preferred as reference for weight loss results? Insights in bariatric weight loss mechanisms by comparing primary and revision gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):687–93.CrossRefPubMed Van de Laar AW, Dollé MH, de Brauw LM, et al. Which baseline weight should be preferred as reference for weight loss results? Insights in bariatric weight loss mechanisms by comparing primary and revision gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):687–93.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fischer L, Hildebrandt C, Bruckner T, et al. Excessive weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):721–31.CrossRefPubMed Fischer L, Hildebrandt C, Bruckner T, et al. Excessive weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):721–31.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):319–24.CrossRefPubMed Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):319–24.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gagner M, Gumbs AA, Milone L, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the super-super-obese (body mass index >60 kg/m(2)). Surg Today. 2008;38(5):399–403.CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Gumbs AA, Milone L, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the super-super-obese (body mass index >60 kg/m(2)). Surg Today. 2008;38(5):399–403.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Van de Laar A, de Caluwé L, Dillemans B. Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess body mass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):763–7.CrossRefPubMed Van de Laar A, de Caluwé L, Dillemans B. Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess body mass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):763–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Van de Laar AW. Algorithm for weight loss after gastric bypass surgery considering body mass index, gender, and age from the Bariatric Outcome Longitudinal Database (BOLD). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(1):55–61.CrossRefPubMed Van de Laar AW. Algorithm for weight loss after gastric bypass surgery considering body mass index, gender, and age from the Bariatric Outcome Longitudinal Database (BOLD). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(1):55–61.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Van de Laar AW, Dollé MH, de Brauw LM, et al. Validating the alterable weight loss (AWL) metric with 2-year weight loss outcome of 500 patients after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1085–9.CrossRefPubMed Van de Laar AW, Dollé MH, de Brauw LM, et al. Validating the alterable weight loss (AWL) metric with 2-year weight loss outcome of 500 patients after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1085–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Van de Laar AW, Acherman YI. Weight loss percentile charts of large representative series: a benchmark defining sufficient weight loss challenging current criteria for success of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2014;24(5):727–34.CrossRefPubMed Van de Laar AW, Acherman YI. Weight loss percentile charts of large representative series: a benchmark defining sufficient weight loss challenging current criteria for success of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2014;24(5):727–34.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sczepaniak JP, Owens ML, Shukla H, et al. Comparability of weight loss reporting after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy using BOLD data 2008–2011. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):788–95.CrossRefPubMed Sczepaniak JP, Owens ML, Shukla H, et al. Comparability of weight loss reporting after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy using BOLD data 2008–2011. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):788–95.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Usefulness of Baltasar’s expected body mass index as an indicator of bariatric weight loss surgery
Authors
Alicia Molina López
Fàtima Sabench Pereferrer
Margarida Vives Espelta
Anna Bonada Sanjaume
Santiago Blanco Blasco
Esther Raga Carceller
Mercè Hernández González
Antonio Sánchez Marín
Jordi Salas Salvadó
Daniel Del Castillo Déjardin
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2163-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Obesity Surgery 11/2016 Go to the issue