Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 7/2014

01-07-2014 | Original Contributions

Validating the Alterable Weight Loss (AWL) Metric with 2-Year Weight Loss Outcome of 500 Patients After Gastric Bypass

Authors: A. W. van de Laar, M. H. Dollé, L. M. de Brauw, S. C. Bruin, Y. I. Acherman

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 7/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Percentage alterable weight loss (AWL) is the only known weight loss metric independent of the initial body mass index (BMI), a unique feature ideal for use in weight loss research. AWL was not yet validated. The aim of the study is to validate the AWL metric and to confirm advantages over the excess weight loss (EWL) metric.

Methods

AWL is tested with 2-year weight loss results of all primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients operated in our hospital. Nadir results of patients with higher and lower initial BMI are compared (Mann–Whitney; p < 0.05) using outcome metrics BMI, percentage weight loss (WL), EWL, and AWL, for the whole group, for each gender, and for <40 and ≥40 years separately.

Results

Five-hundred patients (401 female) out of 508 (98.4 %) had 2-year follow-up. Of all four metrics, only AWL rendered results not significantly influenced by initial BMI. The AWL outcome is initial BMI independent for both genders and age-groups. Results also confirm that women and younger patients had significantly higher AWL outcome.

Conclusion

The recently developed AWL metric, defined as 100% × (initialBMI − BMI) / (initialBMI − 13), is now validated. In contrast to the well-known outcome metrics BMI, EWL, and WL, the AWL metric is independent of the initial BMI. It should replace the misleading EWL metric for comparing weight loss results in bariatric research and for expressing the effectiveness of bariatric procedures. This effectiveness does not act on the total body mass, or on the excess part, but on the alterable part, defined as BMI minus 13 kg/m2 for all adult patients, female, male, young, and old.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dixon JB, McPhail T, O’Brien PE. Minimal reporting requirements for weight loss: current methods not ideal. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1034–9.PubMedCrossRef Dixon JB, McPhail T, O’Brien PE. Minimal reporting requirements for weight loss: current methods not ideal. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1034–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dallal RM, Quebbemann BB, Hunt LH, et al. Analysis of weight loss after bariatric surgery using mixed-effects linear modeling. Obes Surg. 2009;19:732–7.PubMedCrossRef Dallal RM, Quebbemann BB, Hunt LH, et al. Analysis of weight loss after bariatric surgery using mixed-effects linear modeling. Obes Surg. 2009;19:732–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Karmali S, Birch DW, Sharma AM. Is it time to abandon excess weight loss in reporting surgical weight loss? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;4:503–6.CrossRef Karmali S, Birch DW, Sharma AM. Is it time to abandon excess weight loss in reporting surgical weight loss? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;4:503–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hatoum IJ, Kaplan LM. Advantages of percent weight loss as a method of reporting weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obesity. 2013;21(8):1519–25.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hatoum IJ, Kaplan LM. Advantages of percent weight loss as a method of reporting weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obesity. 2013;21(8):1519–25.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference van de Laar A, de Caluwé L, Dillemans B. Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess body mass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):763–7.PubMedCrossRef van de Laar A, de Caluwé L, Dillemans B. Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess body mass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):763–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference van de Laar A. Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD) suggests excess weight loss and excess BMI loss to be inappropriate outcome measures. Demonstrating better alternatives. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1843–7.PubMedCrossRef van de Laar A. Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD) suggests excess weight loss and excess BMI loss to be inappropriate outcome measures. Demonstrating better alternatives. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1843–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference van de Laar AW. Algorithm for weight loss after gastric bypass surgery considering body mass index, gender, and age from the Bariatric Outcome Longitudinal Database (BOLD). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Jun 13. doi:pii: S1550-7289 (13)00181-0. 10.1016/j.soard.2013.05.008. [Epub ahead of print] van de Laar AW. Algorithm for weight loss after gastric bypass surgery considering body mass index, gender, and age from the Bariatric Outcome Longitudinal Database (BOLD). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Jun 13. doi:pii: S1550-7289 (13)00181-0. 10.​1016/​j.​soard.​2013.​05.​008. [Epub ahead of print]
8.
go back to reference van de Laar AW, Acherman YI. Weight loss percentile charts of large representative series: a benchmark defining sufficient weight loss challenging current criteria for success of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013 Nov 14. doi 10.1007/s11695-013-1130-9 [Epub ahead of print] van de Laar AW, Acherman YI. Weight loss percentile charts of large representative series: a benchmark defining sufficient weight loss challenging current criteria for success of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013 Nov 14. doi 10.​1007/​s11695-013-1130-9 [Epub ahead of print]
9.
go back to reference Rosling AM, Sparén P, Norring C, et al. Mortality of eating disorders: a follow-up study of treatment in a specialist unit 1974–2000. Int J Eat Disord. 2011;44(4):304–10.PubMedCrossRef Rosling AM, Sparén P, Norring C, et al. Mortality of eating disorders: a follow-up study of treatment in a specialist unit 1974–2000. Int J Eat Disord. 2011;44(4):304–10.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström C, et al. Swedish obese subjects study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.PubMedCrossRef Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström C, et al. Swedish obese subjects study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Christou N, Efthimiou E. Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a comprehensive bariatric surgery program in Canada. Can J Surg. 2009;52:249–58. Christou N, Efthimiou E. Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a comprehensive bariatric surgery program in Canada. Can J Surg. 2009;52:249–58.
13.
go back to reference Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;14:565–8.CrossRef Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;14:565–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mason EE, Amaral J, Cowan GS, et al. Standards for reporting results. Obes Surg. 1994;4(1):56–65.PubMedCrossRef Mason EE, Amaral J, Cowan GS, et al. Standards for reporting results. Obes Surg. 1994;4(1):56–65.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56.PubMedCrossRef Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validating the Alterable Weight Loss (AWL) Metric with 2-Year Weight Loss Outcome of 500 Patients After Gastric Bypass
Authors
A. W. van de Laar
M. H. Dollé
L. M. de Brauw
S. C. Bruin
Y. I. Acherman
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 7/2014
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1203-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2014

Obesity Surgery 7/2014 Go to the issue