Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
World Journal of Urology
Published in: World Journal of Urology 1/2024

01-12-2024 | Urolithiasis | Topic Paper

Advancements in stone classification: unveiling the beauty of urolithiasis

Authors: Vincent De Coninck, Andreas Skolarikos, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Manu Joris, Olivier Traxer, Etienne Xavier Keller

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Urolithiasis has become increasingly prevalent, leading to higher disability-adjusted life years and deaths. Various stone classification systems have been developed to enhance the understanding of lithogenesis, aid urologists in treatment decisions, and predict recurrence risk. The aim of this manuscript is to provide an overview of different stone classification criteria.

Methods

Two authors conducted a review of literature on studies relating to the classification of urolithiasis. A narrative synthesis for analysis of the studies was used.

Results

Stones can be categorized based on anatomical position, size, medical imaging features, risk of recurrence, etiology, composition, and morphoconstitutional analysis. The first three mentioned offer a straightforward approach to stone classification, directly influencing treatment recommendations. With the routine use of CT imaging before treatment, precise details like anatomical location, stone dimensions, and Hounsfield Units can be easily determined, aiding treatment planning. In contrast, classifying stones based on risk of recurrence and etiology is more complex due to dependencies on multiple variables, including stone composition and morphology. A classification system based on morphoconstitutional analysis, which combines morphological stone appearance and chemical composition, has demonstrated its value. It allows for the rapid identification of crystalline phase principles, the detection of crystalline conversion processes, the determination of etiopathogenesis, the recognition of lithogenic processes, the assessment of crystal formation speed, related recurrence rates, and guidance for selecting appropriate treatment modalities.

Conclusions

Recognizing that no single classification system can comprehensively cover all aspects, the integration of all classification approaches is essential for tailoring urolithiasis patient-specific management.
Literature
1.
Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y (2017) Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 35:1301–1320CrossRefPubMed
2.
Lang J, Narendrula A, El-Zawahry A, Sindhwani P, Ekwenna O (2022) Global Trends in Incidence and Burden of Urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019: An Analysis of Global Burden of Disease Study Data. Eur Urol Open Sci 35:37–46PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Juliebo-Jones P, Ulvik O, Ms AE, Gjengsto P, Beisland C, Somani BK (2023) Mortality due to urolithiasis in England and Wales: updated findings from a national database over a 23-year period. Cent Eur J Urol 76:141–143
4.
Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP et al (2016) Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. PART II J Urol 196:1161–1169PubMedCrossRef
5.
Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L, Lombardo R, Yuan C, Thomas K et al (2023) Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022. Eur Urol Focus 9:199–208PubMedCrossRef
6.
Keller EX, De Coninck V, Traxer O, Shvero A, Kleinmann N, Hubosky SG, et al. Stones. Advanced Ureteroscopy: A Practitioner's Guide to Treating Difficult Problems: Springer; 2021. p. 105–54
7.
Keller EX, De Coninck V, Audouin M, Doizi S, Daudon M, Traxer O (2019) Stone composition independently predicts stone size in 18,029 spontaneously passed stones. World J Urol 37:2493–2499PubMedCrossRef
8.
De Coninck V, Antonelli J, Chew B, Patterson JM, Skolarikos A, Bultitude M (2019) Medical Expulsive Therapy for Urinary Stones: Future Trends and Knowledge Gaps. Eur Urol 76:658–666PubMedCrossRef
9.
De Coninck V, Traxer O (2018) The Time Has Come to Report Stone Burden in Terms of Volume Instead of Largest Diameter. J Endourol 32:265–266PubMedCrossRef
10.
Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Daudon M, Traxer O (2021) What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation. World J Urol 39:187–194PubMedCrossRef
11.
De Coninck V, Ventimiglia E, Traxer O (2022) How Should We Assess Stone Ablation Efficacy When Comparing Different Lasers? Eur Urol Focus 8:1450–1451PubMedCrossRef
12.
De Coninck V, Somani B, Sener ET, Emiliani E, Corrales M, Juliebo-Jones P et al (2022) Ureteral access sheaths and its use in the future: a comprehensive update based on a literature review. J Clin Med 11(17):5128PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Traxer O (2020) The role of ureteroscopy for treatment of staghorn calculi: A systematic review. Asian J Urol 7:110–115PubMedCrossRef
14.
Elton DC, Turkbey EB, Pickhardt PJ, Summers RM (2022) A deep learning system for automated kidney stone detection and volumetric segmentation on noncontrast CT scans. Med Phys 49:2545–2554PubMedCrossRef
15.
Rodriguez-Plata IT, Medina-Escobedo M, Basulto-Martinez M, Avila-Nava A, Gutierrez-Solis AL, Mendez-Dominguez N et al (2021) Implementation of a Technique Based on Hounsfield Units and Hounsfield Density to Determine Kidney Stone Composition. Tomography 7:606–613PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Tailly T, Larish Y, Nadeau B, Violette P, Glickman L, Olvera-Posada D et al (2016) Combining Mean and Standard Deviation of Hounsfield Unit Measurements from Preoperative CT Allows More Accurate Prediction of Urinary Stone Composition Than Mean Hounsfield Units Alone. J Endourol 30:453–459PubMedCrossRef
17.
Kaviani P, Primak A, Bizzo B, Ebrahimian S, Saini S, Dreyer KJ et al (2023) Performance of threshold-based stone segmentation and radiomics for determining the composition of kidney stones from single-energy CT. Jpn J Radiol 41:194–200PubMedCrossRef
18.
Euler A, Wullschleger S, Sartoretti T, Muller D, Keller EX, Lavrek D et al (2023) Dual-energy CT kidney stone characterization-can diagnostic accuracy be achieved at low radiation dose? Eur Radiol 33(9):6238–6244PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Grosjean R, Sauer B, Guerra RM, Daudon M, Blum A, Felblinger J et al (2008) Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT: advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:720–728PubMedCrossRef
20.
Bellin MF, Renard-Penna R, Conort P, Bissery A, Meric JB, Daudon M et al (2004) Helical CT evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary tract calculi with a discriminant analysis of CT-attenuation values and density. Eur Radiol 14:2134–2140PubMedCrossRef
21.
Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B (1998) Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 159:673–675PubMedCrossRef
22.
Tsaturyan A, Bokova E, Bosshard P, Bonny O, Fuster DG, Roth B (2020) Oral chemolysis is an effective, non-invasive therapy for urinary stones suspected of uric acid content. Urolithiasis 48:501–507PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Garg M, Johnson H, Lee SM, Rai BP, Somani B, Philip J (2023) Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review. Curr Urol Rep 24:173–185PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK, Mandal P, Sankhwar SN, Sharma SK (2002) Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study J Urol 167:1968–1971PubMed
25.
Perks AE, Gotto G, Teichman JM (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography. J Urol 178:912–915PubMedCrossRef
26.
Lim EJ, Castellani D, So WZ, Fong KY, Li JQ, Tiong HY, et al. (2022) Radiomics in Urolithiasis: Systematic Review of Current Applications, Limitations, and Future Directions. J Clin Med 11(17):5151PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petřík A, Somani B, Thomas K, Gambaro G, et al. (2022) Urolithiasis. EAU Guidelines Edn presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam
28.
Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG, Curhan G, Denu-Ciocca CJ, Matlaga BR et al (2014) Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol 192:316–324PubMedCrossRef
29.
Rule AD, Lieske JC, Li X, Melton LJ 3rd, Krambeck AE, Bergstralh EJ (2014) The ROKS nomogram for predicting a second symptomatic stone episode. J Am Soc Nephrol 25:2878–2886PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Kavoussi NL, Da Silva A, Floyd C, McCoy A, Koyama T, Hsi RS (2023) Feasibility of stone recurrence risk stratification using the recurrence of kidney stone (ROKS) nomogram. Urolithiasis 51:73PubMedCrossRef
31.
Iremashvili V, Li S, Penniston KL, Best SL, Hedican SP, Nakada SY (2019) External Validation of the Recurrence of Kidney Stone Nomogram in a Surgical Cohort. J Endourol 33:475–479PubMedCrossRef
32.
33.
Rodger F, Roditi G, Aboumarzouk OM (2018) Diagnostic Accuracy of Low and Ultra-Low Dose CT for Identification of Urinary Tract Stones: A Systematic Review. Urol Int 100:375–385PubMedCrossRef
34.
35.
Snicorius M, Drevinskaite M, Miglinas M, Cekauskas A, Stadulyte M, Bandzeviciute R et al (2023) A Novel Infrared Spectroscopy Method for Analysis of Stone Dust for Establishing Final Composition of Urolithiasis. Eur Urol Open Sci 47:36–42PubMedCrossRef
36.
Castiglione V, Sacre PY, Cavalier E, Hubert P, Gadisseur R, Ziemons E (2018) Raman chemical imaging, a new tool in kidney stone structure analysis: Case-study and comparison to Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy. PLoS ONE 13:e0201460PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
38.
Racek M, Racek J, Hupakova I (2019) Scanning electron microscopy in analysis of urinary stones. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 79:208–217PubMedCrossRef
39.
Daudon M, Jungers P, Lacour B (2004) Clinical value of crystalluria study. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 62:379–393PubMed
40.
Daudon M (1991) Jungers P [Analytical methods of calculi and urinary crystals]. Rev Prat 41:2017–2022PubMed
41.
Zhu W, Sun Z, Ye L, Zhang X, Xing Y, Zhu Q et al (2022) Preliminary assessment of a portable Raman spectroscopy system for post-operative urinary stone analysis. World J Urol 40:229–235PubMedCrossRef
42.
Daudon M, Bader CA, Jungers P (1993) Urinary calculi: review of classification methods and correlations with etiology. Scann Microsc 7:1081–1104
43.
De Coninck V, Keller EX, Daudon M, Traxer O (2019) RE: Geobiology reveals how human kidney stones dissolve in vivo (by: Sivaguru et al 2018). World J Urol 37:2543PubMedCrossRef
44.
Keller EX, de Coninck V, Audouin M, Doizi S, Bazin D, Daudon M et al (2019) Fragments and dust after Holmium laser lithotripsy with or without “Moses technology”: How are they different? J Biophotonics 12:e201800227PubMedCrossRef
45.
Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Daudon M, Traxer O (2021) Thulium fiber laser: ready to dust all urinary stone composition types? World J Urol 39:1693–1698PubMedCrossRef
46.
Krambeck AE, Khan NF, Jackson ME, Lingeman JE, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr (2010) Inaccurate reporting of mineral composition by commercial stone analysis laboratories: implications for infection and metabolic stones. J Urol 184:1543–1549PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Siener R, Buchholz N, Daudon M, Hess B, Knoll T, Osther PJ et al (2016) Quality Assessment of Urinary Stone Analysis: Results of a Multicenter Study of Laboratories in Europe. PLoS ONE 11:e0156606PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Daudon M, Donsimoni R, Hennequin C, Fellahi S, Le Moel G, Paris M et al (1995) Sex- and age-related composition of 10 617 calculi analyzed by infrared spectroscopy. Urol Res 23:319–326PubMedCrossRef
49.
Ord WM, Shattock SG (1895) On the microscopic structure of urinary calculi of oxalate of lime: Adlar and Son, Bartholomew Close
50.
Prien EL, Frondel C (1947) Studies in urolithiasis: I. The composition of urinary calculi. J Urol 57:949–991PubMedCrossRef
51.
Murphy BT, Pyrah L (1962) The composition, structure, and mechanisms of the formation of urinary calculi. Br J Urol 34:129–159PubMedCrossRef
52.
Schubert G, Brien G (1981) Crystallographic investigations of urinary calcium oxalate calculi. Int Urol Nephrol 13:249–260PubMedCrossRef
53.
Otnes B (1983) Correlation between causes and composition of urinary stones. Scand J Urol Nephrol 17:93–98PubMedCrossRef
54.
55.
Smith L (1987) Pathogenesis of renal stones. Miner Electrolyte Metab 13:214–219PubMed
56.
Wilson DM (1989) Clinical and laboratory approaches for evaluation of nephrolithiasis. J Urol 141:770–774PubMedCrossRef
57.
Daudon M, Jungers P (2004) Clinical value of crystalluria and quantitative morphoconstitutional analysis of urinary calculi. Nephron Physiol 98:p31–p36PubMedCrossRef
58.
De Coninck V, Keller EX, Traxer O (2019) Metabolic evaluation: who, when and how often. Curr Opin Urol 29:52–64PubMedCrossRef
59.
Asplin JR, Lingeman J, Kahnoski R, Mardis H, Parks JH, Coe FL (1998) Metabolic urinary correlates of calcium oxalate dihydrate in renal stones. J Urol 159:664–668PubMedCrossRef
60.
Daudon M (1984) Reveillaud RJ [Whewellite and weddellite: toward a different etiopathogenesis. The significance of morphological typing of calculi]. Nephrologie 5:195–201PubMed
61.
von Unruh GE, Voss S, Sauerbruch T, Hesse A (2004) Dependence of oxalate absorption on the daily calcium intake. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:1567–1573CrossRef
62.
Frochot V, Daudon M (2016) Clinical value of crystalluria and quantitative morphoconstitutional analysis of urinary calculi. Int J Surg 36:624–632PubMedCrossRef
63.
Cloutier J, Villa L, Traxer O, Daudon M (2015) Kidney stone analysis: “Give me your stone, I will tell you who you are!” World J Urol 33:157–169PubMedCrossRef
64.
Dessombz A, Letavernier E, Haymann JP, Bazin D, Daudon M (2015) Calcium phosphate stone morphology can reliably predict distal renal tubular acidosis. J Urol 193:1564–1569PubMedCrossRef
65.
Randall A (1936) An Hypothesis for the Origin of Renal Calculus. N Engl J Med 214:234–242CrossRef
66.
Daudon M, Bazin D, Letavernier E (2015) Randall’s plaque as the origin of calcium oxalate kidney stones. Urolithiasis 43(Suppl 1):5–11PubMedCrossRef
67.
Almeras C, Daudon M, Estrade V, Gautier JR, Traxer O, Meria P (2021) Classification of the renal papillary abnormalities by flexible ureteroscopy: evaluation of the 2016 version and update. World J Urol 39:177–185PubMedCrossRef
68.
Evan AP, Coe FL, Lingeman J, Bledsoe S, Worcester EM (2018) Randall’s plaque in stone formers originates in ascending thin limbs. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 315:F1236–F1242PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
Bouderlique E, Tang E, Perez J, Coudert A, Bazin D, Verpont MC et al (2019) Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation Accelerates Randall’s Plaque Formation in a Murine Model. Am J Pathol 189:2171–2180PubMedCrossRef
70.
Borofsky MS, Williams JC Jr, Dauw CA, Cohen A, Evan AC, Coe FL et al (2019) Association Between Randall’s Plaque Stone Anchors and Renal Papillary Pits. J Endourol 33:337–342PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Ching CB, Dickinson K, Karafilidis J, Marchesani N, Mucha L, Antunes N et al (2023) The real world experience of pediatric primary hyperoxaluria patients in the PEDSnet clinical research network. Eur J Pediatr 182(9):4027–4036PubMedCrossRef
72.
Daudon M, Jungers P, Bazin D (2008) Peculiar morphology of stones in primary hyperoxaluria. N Engl J Med 359:100–102PubMedCrossRef
73.
Daudon M, Estepa L, Lacour B, Jungers P (1998) Unusual morphology of calcium oxalate calculi in primary hyperoxaluria. J Nephrol 11(Suppl 1):51–55PubMed
74.
Daudon M, Jungers P, Bazin D, Williams JC Jr (2018) Recurrence rates of urinary calculi according to stone composition and morphology. Urolithiasis 46:459–470PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
75.
76.
Sakamoto W, Kishimoto T, Takegaki Y, Sugimoto T, Wada S, Yamamoto K et al (1991) Stone fragility–measurement of stone mineral content by dual photon absorptiometry. Eur Urol 20:150–153PubMedCrossRef
77.
Mandhani A, Raghavendran M, Srivastava A, Kapoor R, Singh U, Kumar A et al (2003) Prediction of fragility of urinary calculi by dual X-ray absorptiometry. J Urol 170:1097–1100PubMedCrossRef
78.
Williams JC Jr, Saw KC, Paterson RF, Hatt EK, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE (2003) Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 61:1092–1096PubMedCrossRef
79.
Daudon M, Bazin D, Andre G, Jungers P, Cousson A, Chevallier P et al (2009) Examination of whewellite kidney stones by scanning electron microscopy and powder neutron diffraction techniques. J Appl Crystallogr 42:109–115CrossRef
80.
Bhatta KM, Prien EL Jr, Dretler SP (1989) Cystine calculi–rough and smooth: a new clinical distinction. J Urol 142:937–940PubMedCrossRef
81.
Pittomvils G, Vandeursen H, Wevers M, Lafaut JP, De Ridder D, De Meester P et al (1994) The influence of internal stone structure upon the fracture behaviour of urinary calculi. Ultrasound Med Biol 20:803–810PubMedCrossRef
82.
Zreik R, Pilosov Solomon I, Saliba W, Tor R, Cohen S, Friefeld Y et al (2023) The relationship between patients’ kidney stone type and demographics in Israel: analysis of 10 K patients. World J Urol 41:1641–1646PubMedCrossRef
83.
84.
Halinski A, Bhatti KH, Boeri L, Cloutier J, Davidoff K, Elqady A et al (2021) Stone composition of renal stone formers from different global regions. Arch Ital Urol Androl 93:307–312PubMedCrossRef
85.
Sierra A, Corrales M, Kolvatzis M, Daudon M, Traxer O (2022) Thulium Fiber Laser’s Dust for Stone Composition Analysis: Is It Enough? A Pilot Study J Endourol 36:1468–1474PubMedCrossRef
86.
Estrade V, Denis de Senneville B, Meria P, Almeras C, Bladou F, Bernhard JC et al (2021) Toward improved endoscopic examination of urinary stones: a concordance study between endoscopic digital pictures vs microscopy. BJU Int 128:319–330PubMedCrossRef
87.
Henderickx M, Stoots SJM, De Bruin DM, Wijkstra H, Freund JE, Wiseman OJ et al (2022) How Reliable Is Endoscopic Stone Recognition? A Comparison Between Visual Stone Identification and Formal Stone Analysis. J Endourol 36:1362–1370PubMedCrossRef
88.
Estrade V, Daudon M, Richard E, Bernhard JC, Bladou F, Robert G et al (2022) Towards automatic recognition of pure and mixed stones using intra-operative endoscopic digital images. BJU Int 129:234–242PubMedCrossRef
89.
Estrade V, Daudon M, Richard E, Bernhard JC, Bladou F, Robert G et al (2022) Deep morphological recognition of kidney stones using intra-operative endoscopic digital videos. Phys Med Biol 67 (16)
90.
El Beze J, Mazeaud C, Daul C, Ochoa-Ruiz G, Daudon M, Eschwege P et al (2022) Evaluation and understanding of automated urinary stone recognition methods. BJU Int 130:786–798PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
91.
Black KM, Law H, Aldoukhi A, Deng J, Ghani KR (2020) Deep learning computer vision algorithm for detecting kidney stone composition. BJU Int 125:920–924PubMedCrossRef
92.
Kwok JL, De Coninck V, Ventimiglia E, Panthier F, Corrales M, Sierra A et al (2023) Laser ablation efficiency, laser ablation speed, and laser energy consumption during lithotripsy: what are they and how are they defined? A systematic review and proposal for a standardized terminology. European Urology Focus S2405–4569(23):00222–00225
Metadata
Title
Advancements in stone classification: unveiling the beauty of urolithiasis
Authors
Vincent De Coninck
Andreas Skolarikos
Patrick Juliebø-Jones
Manu Joris
Olivier Traxer
Etienne Xavier Keller
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Urolithiasis
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04746-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

World Journal of Urology 1/2024 Go to the issue

Topic Paper

Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Original Article

Improved early continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the urethral hammock technique

Letter to the Editor

Understanding the study of 21-year follow-up results of the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

Original Article

High-intensity focused ultrasound with visually directed power adjustment for focal treatment of localized prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the editor for the article “Prognostic factors of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma”

Original Article

A PSMA PET/CT-based risk model for prediction of concordance between targeted biopsy and combined biopsy in detecting prostate cancer