Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 1/2018

01-02-2018 | Invited Review

Ureteroscopy from the recent past to the near future

Author: José Manuel Reis Santos

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Stone surgery is one of oldest surgical practices undertaken by man. Hippocrates refused to let his followers “cut for the stone” and it was only in February 1980, when the first human trial of shock wave therapy on a renal stone was performed with success that a new era in minimally invasive treatment (surgery) for stones was opened up and this condemnation was finally resolved in the Hippocratic Oath. Endoscopy, using natural orifices, supported by anaesthesia, incremented by technology and with access to all points along the urinary tract, began by competing with ESWL, but is now the treatment of choice in most cases. As far as we know humans have always had stones. First, lithiasis was endemic bladder stones in children, now it is renal in general. Added to this a number of well-known risk factors, a rapid increase in obesity in the population, as well as bariatric surgery for its treatment, are causing an increase in the prevalence and recurrence of lithiasis everywhere. A short history of the advances made with the introduction and development of the ureteroscope, along with auxiliary devices, will show why this is the preferred technique at the moment for treating lithiasis in general and for treating stones in pregnant women, children and the obese in particular. Being a minimally invasive surgery, with a low morbidity and a very high efficiency and stonefree rate, has become established as a clear future technique for both adults and children. This development is not only due to technological advancements, but also to the routine use of the Holmium: YAG LASER for intracorporeal lithotripsy, capable of destroying any stone regardless of its composition or location, surpassing the ability of any other lithotripter. It is also due to the development of devices that allow access to the ureter and all parts of the kidney, as well as auxiliary aids to assist in the handling of stones during treatment. New LASERs, robotic control of the fdURS and digital imaging, as well as disposable devices, have had and, indeed, continue to have a unique impact on future development in this field. However, success will continue to depend on the careful choice of fURS, energy source and ancillary instruments obtained by the urologist during both real life and virtual training in human simulators.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR (2005) Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 68:1808–1814CrossRefPubMed Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR (2005) Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 68:1808–1814CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Turney BW, Reynard JM, Noble JG, Keoghane SR (2012) Trends in urological stone disease. BJU Int 109:1082–1087CrossRefPubMed Turney BW, Reynard JM, Noble JG, Keoghane SR (2012) Trends in urological stone disease. BJU Int 109:1082–1087CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zaninotto P, Head J, Stamatakis E, Wardle H, Mindell J (2009) Trends in obesity among adults in England from 1993 to 2004 by age and social class and projections of prevalence to 2012. J Epidemiol Commun Health 63:140–146CrossRef Zaninotto P, Head J, Stamatakis E, Wardle H, Mindell J (2009) Trends in obesity among adults in England from 1993 to 2004 by age and social class and projections of prevalence to 2012. J Epidemiol Commun Health 63:140–146CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC (2005) Obesity, weight gain and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA 293:455–462CrossRefPubMed Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC (2005) Obesity, weight gain and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA 293:455–462CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Reis Santos JM, Alberto T (2011) Epidemiology of pediatric urolithiasis. In: Rao PN et al (eds) Urinary tract stone disease, vol 35. Springer, London, pp 409–420 Reis Santos JM, Alberto T (2011) Epidemiology of pediatric urolithiasis. In: Rao PN et al (eds) Urinary tract stone disease, vol 35. Springer, London, pp 409–420
6.
go back to reference Smith AD, Preminger G, Badlani G, Kavoussi L (2012) Smith’s; textbook of endourology, 3rd edn. Wiley, USA, pp 365–387CrossRef Smith AD, Preminger G, Badlani G, Kavoussi L (2012) Smith’s; textbook of endourology, 3rd edn. Wiley, USA, pp 365–387CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tiselius HG (2008) How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones? J Endourol 22:249–255CrossRefPubMed Tiselius HG (2008) How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones? J Endourol 22:249–255CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC (2005) Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol 173:848–857CrossRefPubMed Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC (2005) Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol 173:848–857CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Murphy LJT (1972) History of Urology. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield Murphy LJT (1972) History of Urology. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield
12.
go back to reference Young HH, McKay RW (1929) Congenital valvular obstruction of the posterior urethra. Surg Gynecol Obstet 48:509–535 Young HH, McKay RW (1929) Congenital valvular obstruction of the posterior urethra. Surg Gynecol Obstet 48:509–535
15.
go back to reference Ferraro RF, Abraham VE, Cohen TD et al (1999) A new generation of semirigid fiberoptic ureteroscopes. J Endourol 13:35–40CrossRefPubMed Ferraro RF, Abraham VE, Cohen TD et al (1999) A new generation of semirigid fiberoptic ureteroscopes. J Endourol 13:35–40CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hirschowitz BI, Peters CW, Curtis LE (1957) Preliminary reports on a long fiberscope for examination of the stomach and duodenum. Univ Mich Med Bull 23:178–180PubMed Hirschowitz BI, Peters CW, Curtis LE (1957) Preliminary reports on a long fiberscope for examination of the stomach and duodenum. Univ Mich Med Bull 23:178–180PubMed
17.
go back to reference Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63:1817–1823CrossRefPubMed Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63:1817–1823CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Haleblian GE, Springhart WP, Maloney ME et al (2005) Digital video ureteroscope: a new paradigm in ureteroscopy. J Endourol 19:a80 Haleblian GE, Springhart WP, Maloney ME et al (2005) Digital video ureteroscope: a new paradigm in ureteroscopy. J Endourol 19:a80
20.
go back to reference Traxer O, Dubosq F, Jamali K et al (2006) New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology 68:276–279 (discussion 280–1)CrossRefPubMed Traxer O, Dubosq F, Jamali K et al (2006) New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology 68:276–279 (discussion 280–1)CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Khanna R, Monga M (2011). Instrumentation in endourology. Ther Adv Urol 3:119–126 Khanna R, Monga M (2011). Instrumentation in endourology. Ther Adv Urol 3:119–126
23.
go back to reference Dickstein RJ, Kreshover JE, Babayan RK et al (2013) Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol 24:1589–1592CrossRef Dickstein RJ, Kreshover JE, Babayan RK et al (2013) Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol 24:1589–1592CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Eandi JA, Hu B, Low RK (2008) Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. J Endourol 22:1653–1658CrossRefPubMed Eandi JA, Hu B, Low RK (2008) Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. J Endourol 22:1653–1658CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Weiland D, Canales BK, Monga M (2006) Medical devices used for ureteroscopy for renal calculi. Expert Rev Med Devices 3:73–80CrossRefPubMed Weiland D, Canales BK, Monga M (2006) Medical devices used for ureteroscopy for renal calculi. Expert Rev Med Devices 3:73–80CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ng YH, Somani BK, Dennison A et al (2010) Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. J Endourol 24:1915–1920CrossRefPubMed Ng YH, Somani BK, Dennison A et al (2010) Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. J Endourol 24:1915–1920CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R et al (2004) Prospective randomized comparison of 2 ureteral access sheaths during flexible retrograde ureteroscopy. J Urol 172:572–573CrossRefPubMed Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R et al (2004) Prospective randomized comparison of 2 ureteral access sheaths during flexible retrograde ureteroscopy. J Urol 172:572–573CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Pedro RN, Hendlin K, Durfee WK et al (2007) Physical characteristics of next-generation ureteral access sheaths: buckling and kinking. Urology 70:440–442CrossRefPubMed Pedro RN, Hendlin K, Durfee WK et al (2007) Physical characteristics of next-generation ureteral access sheaths: buckling and kinking. Urology 70:440–442CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Eisner BH, Dretler SP (2009) Use of the Stone Cone for prevention of calculus retropulsion during holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: case series and review of the literature. Urol Int 82:356–360CrossRefPubMed Eisner BH, Dretler SP (2009) Use of the Stone Cone for prevention of calculus retropulsion during holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: case series and review of the literature. Urol Int 82:356–360CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Tracy CR, McLeroy S, Best SL, Gnade BE, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA (2010) Rendering stone fragments paramagnetic with iron-oxide microparticles improves the efficiency and effectiveness of endoscopic stone fragment retrievel. Urology 76:1266CrossRefPubMed Tracy CR, McLeroy S, Best SL, Gnade BE, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA (2010) Rendering stone fragments paramagnetic with iron-oxide microparticles improves the efficiency and effectiveness of endoscopic stone fragment retrievel. Urology 76:1266CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Magheli A, Semins MJ, Allaf ME et al (2012) Critical analysis of the miniaturized stone basket: effect on deflection and flow rate. J Endourol 26:275–277CrossRefPubMed Magheli A, Semins MJ, Allaf ME et al (2012) Critical analysis of the miniaturized stone basket: effect on deflection and flow rate. J Endourol 26:275–277CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Blew BD, Dagnone AJ, Fazio LM et al (2007) Practical comparison of four nitinol stone baskets. J Endourol 21:655–658CrossRefPubMed Blew BD, Dagnone AJ, Fazio LM et al (2007) Practical comparison of four nitinol stone baskets. J Endourol 21:655–658CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Korman E, Hendlin K, Monga M (2011) Small-diameter nitinol stone baskets: radial dilation force and dynamics of opening. J Endourol 25:1537–1540CrossRefPubMed Korman E, Hendlin K, Monga M (2011) Small-diameter nitinol stone baskets: radial dilation force and dynamics of opening. J Endourol 25:1537–1540CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Bansal H, Swain S, Sharma GK, Mathanya M, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, Singh PB (2011) Polyscope: a new era in flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 25:317CrossRefPubMed Bansal H, Swain S, Sharma GK, Mathanya M, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, Singh PB (2011) Polyscope: a new era in flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 25:317CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, Schlenker B, Tilki D, Hocaoglu Y, Sroka R, Stief CG, Reich O (2010) The polyscope: a modular design, semidisposable flexible ureterorenoscope system. J Endourol 24:1061CrossRefPubMed Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, Schlenker B, Tilki D, Hocaoglu Y, Sroka R, Stief CG, Reich O (2010) The polyscope: a modular design, semidisposable flexible ureterorenoscope system. J Endourol 24:1061CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Perbet S, Blanquet M, Mourgues C, Delmas J, Bertran S, Longère B, Boïko-Alaux V, Chennell P, Bazin JE, Constantin JM (2017) Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu® aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU. Ann Intensive Care 7(1):3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Perbet S, Blanquet M, Mourgues C, Delmas J, Bertran S, Longère B, Boïko-Alaux V, Chennell P, Bazin JE, Constantin JM (2017) Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu® aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU. Ann Intensive Care 7(1):3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Proietti S, Dragos L, Molina W, Doizi S, Giusti G, Trazer O (2016) Comparison of new single-use digital flexible ureteroscope versus nondisposable fiber optic and digital ureteroscope in a cadaveric model. J Endourol 30(6):655–659CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Proietti S, Dragos L, Molina W, Doizi S, Giusti G, Trazer O (2016) Comparison of new single-use digital flexible ureteroscope versus nondisposable fiber optic and digital ureteroscope in a cadaveric model. J Endourol 30(6):655–659CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Ureteroscopy from the recent past to the near future
Author
José Manuel Reis Santos
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1016-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Urolithiasis 1/2018 Go to the issue