Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 1/2018

01-02-2018 | Invited Review

Miniaturisation of PCNL

Author: Sven Lahme

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Conventional PCNL leads to a high stone-free rate but is associated with a significant treatment morbidity. To decrease the morbidity of PCNL but to achieve an equal stone-free rate, in 2001 a miniaturised version of a conventional PCNL (Mini-PCNL) was introduced. Meanwhile numerous modifications of the Mini-PCNL were reported. The ongoing experience with the Mini-PCNL technique showed that Mini-PCNL is not only a miniaturisation but also a different method to remove the stones, as the stones come out of the calyceal system only by means of the irrigation flow without any further need of forceps or baskets. Due to a limited number of papers in the literature, the guidelines so far do not distinguish between conventional and Mini-PCNL, although the Mini-PCNL already became a frequent treatment modality in daily routine worldwide. From the current point of view, Mini-PCNL can be recommended to treat all kinds of upper urinary tract stones exceeding a diameter of 10 mm. In this context, Mini-PCNL is a treatment alternative to flexible ureterorenoscopy, SWL and conventional PCNL. The available literature shows that the morbidity of Mini-PCNL is less and the stone-free rate is equal to that of conventional PCNL. It seems that there is no limitation to Mini-PCNL in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones. The future will show what kind of further miniaturisation of the Mini-PCNL procedure will be appropriate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, Docimo SG (1998) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: experience with a new technique. Urology 52(4):697–701CrossRefPubMed Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, Docimo SG (1998) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: experience with a new technique. Urology 52(4):697–701CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (1998) The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16(6):371–374CrossRefPubMed Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (1998) The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16(6):371–374CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, Götz T (2001) Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol 40(6):619–624CrossRefPubMed Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, Götz T (2001) Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol 40(6):619–624CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lahme S, Zimmermanns V, Hochmuth A, Janitzki V (2008) Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL? Urol A 47(5):563–568CrossRef Lahme S, Zimmermanns V, Hochmuth A, Janitzki V (2008) Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL? Urol A 47(5):563–568CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Sievert KD, Merseburger AS, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A (2008), Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP). Urol A 47(9):1066 (1068–73) CrossRef Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Sievert KD, Merseburger AS, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A (2008), Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP). Urol A 47(9):1066 (1068–73) CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M (2011) The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol Jun 59(6):1054–1059CrossRef Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M (2011) The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol Jun 59(6):1054–1059CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tepeler A, Akman T, Silay MS, Akcay M, Ersoz C, Kalkan S, Armagan A, Sarica K (2014) Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 42(3):275–279CrossRefPubMed Tepeler A, Akman T, Silay MS, Akcay M, Ersoz C, Kalkan S, Armagan A, Sarica K (2014) Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 42(3):275–279CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Silay MS, Tepeler A, Atis G, Sancaktutar AA, Piskin M, Gurbuz C, Penbegul N, Ozturk A, Caskurlu T, Armagan A (2013) Initial report of microperc in the treatment of pediatric nephrolithiasis. J Pediatr Surg 48(7):1578–1583CrossRefPubMed Silay MS, Tepeler A, Atis G, Sancaktutar AA, Piskin M, Gurbuz C, Penbegul N, Ozturk A, Caskurlu T, Armagan A (2013) Initial report of microperc in the treatment of pediatric nephrolithiasis. J Pediatr Surg 48(7):1578–1583CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Desai J, Solanki R (2013) Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP): one more armamentarium. BJU Int 112(7):1046–1049PubMed Desai J, Solanki R (2013) Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP): one more armamentarium. BJU Int 112(7):1046–1049PubMed
10.
go back to reference Desai J, Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhong W, Chen W, Wu W (2013) A novel technique of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: introduction and an initial experience for treatment of upper urinary calculi less than 2 cm. Biomed Res Int 2013:490793CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Desai J, Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhong W, Chen W, Wu W (2013) A novel technique of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: introduction and an initial experience for treatment of upper urinary calculi less than 2 cm. Biomed Res Int 2013:490793CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Zhao Z, Tuerxu A, Liu Y, Wu W, Simayi A, Zhong W, Chen W, Batuer A, Zeng G (2017) Super-mini PCNL (SMP): material, indications, technique, advantages and results. Arch Esp Urol 70(1):211–216PubMed Zhao Z, Tuerxu A, Liu Y, Wu W, Simayi A, Zhong W, Chen W, Batuer A, Zeng G (2017) Super-mini PCNL (SMP): material, indications, technique, advantages and results. Arch Esp Urol 70(1):211–216PubMed
12.
go back to reference Srivastava A, Singh S, Dhayal IR, Rai P (2017) A prospective randomized study comparing the four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 35(5):803–807CrossRefPubMed Srivastava A, Singh S, Dhayal IR, Rai P (2017) A prospective randomized study comparing the four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 35(5):803–807CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference El-Shazly M, Salem S, Allam A, Hathout B (2015) Balloon dilator versus telescopic metal dilators for tract dilatation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones and calyceal stones. Arab J Urol Jun 13(2):80–83CrossRef El-Shazly M, Salem S, Allam A, Hathout B (2015) Balloon dilator versus telescopic metal dilators for tract dilatation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones and calyceal stones. Arab J Urol Jun 13(2):80–83CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Atis G, Culpan M, Pelit ES, Canakci C, Ulus I, Gunaydin B, Yildirim A, Caskurlu T (2017) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in treating 20–40 mm renal stones. Urol J 14(2):2995–2999PubMed Atis G, Culpan M, Pelit ES, Canakci C, Ulus I, Gunaydin B, Yildirim A, Caskurlu T (2017) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in treating 20–40 mm renal stones. Urol J 14(2):2995–2999PubMed
16.
go back to reference Proietti S, Giusti G, Desai M, Ganpule AP (2017) A critical review of miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is smaller better? Eur Urol Focus 3(1):56–61CrossRefPubMed Proietti S, Giusti G, Desai M, Ganpule AP (2017) A critical review of miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is smaller better? Eur Urol Focus 3(1):56–61CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Miniaturisation of PCNL
Author
Sven Lahme
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1029-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Urolithiasis 1/2018 Go to the issue