Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2022

17-01-2022 | Review

Unravelling the Complexities of Workplace Disclosure Among Persons with Non-Visible Disabilities and Illnesses: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography

Authors: Vanessa Tomas, Hiba Ahmed, Sally Lindsay

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Deciding whether and how to disclose a disability at work for persons with non-visible disabilities and illnesses involve complex processes. Research has focused on antecedents and outcomes of disclosure. More research is needed to understand the lived experiences related to disclosure decision-making and actual navigation of disclosure and concealment at work. Purpose: To understand the experiences of persons with non-visible disabilities and illnesses regarding workplace disclosure decision-making, navigating disclosure and/or concealment, and experiential differences across disability and illness types, ages, geographic locations, and genders. Methods: We conducted a qualitative meta-synthesis using Noblit and Hare’s seven steps of meta-ethnography. Searches were conducted via six databases. Studies were analyzed to develop conceptual categories, third-order constructs (themes), and a line-of-argument with comparisons drawn from the disclosure decision making model, disclosure process model, and consideration of disability and illness types, genders, ages, and geographic locations. Results: Twenty-four studies were included involving 489 participants, aged 16 to 81, from nine countries, focusing on one non-visible disability or illness, or multiple. We developed four themes for the disclosure decision-making process (self- and other-focused, experiential, and environmental/workplace factors) and two themes for the disclosure/concealment event (disclosure/concealment logistics and timing) and noted emerging trends across ages, genders, disability and illness types, and geographic locations. Conclusions: Knowledge obtained could be used among professionals who support persons with non-visible disabilities and illnesses to help them navigate disclosure at work, and to consider the role of age, genders, disability and illness types, and geographic locations on disclosure.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Greene K. Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: theories and applications. In: Afifi TD, Afifi WA, editors. Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: theories and applications. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2009. p. 226–253. Greene K. Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: theories and applications. In: Afifi TD, Afifi WA, editors. Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: theories and applications. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2009. p. 226–253.
3.
go back to reference World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
4.
go back to reference MacDonald-Wilson K, Russinova Z, Rogers S, Lin CH, Ferguson T, Dong S, et al. Work accommodation and retention in mental health. In: Schultz IZZ, Rogers SE, editors., et al., Work accommodation and retention in mental health. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 191–217.CrossRef MacDonald-Wilson K, Russinova Z, Rogers S, Lin CH, Ferguson T, Dong S, et al. Work accommodation and retention in mental health. In: Schultz IZZ, Rogers SE, editors., et al., Work accommodation and retention in mental health. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 191–217.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ragins BR. Disclosure disconnects: antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Acad Manag Rev. 2008;33(1):194–215.CrossRef Ragins BR. Disclosure disconnects: antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Acad Manag Rev. 2008;33(1):194–215.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Prince M. Persons with invisible disabilities and workplace accommodation: findings from a scoping literature review. J Vocat Rehabil. 2017;46:75–86.CrossRef Prince M. Persons with invisible disabilities and workplace accommodation: findings from a scoping literature review. J Vocat Rehabil. 2017;46:75–86.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference von Schrader S, Malzer V, Bruyère S. Perspectives on disability disclosure: the importance of employer practices and workplace climate. Empl Responsib Rights J. 2014;26(4):237–255.CrossRef von Schrader S, Malzer V, Bruyère S. Perspectives on disability disclosure: the importance of employer practices and workplace climate. Empl Responsib Rights J. 2014;26(4):237–255.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jones A. Disclosure of mental illness in the workplace: a literature review. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2011;14:212.CrossRef Jones A. Disclosure of mental illness in the workplace: a literature review. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2011;14:212.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Major C, Savin-Baden M. An introduction to qualitative research synthesis. In: Savin-Baden M, Major CH, editors. Making the case for qualitative research synthesis. New York: Routledge; 2010. p. 9–22. Major C, Savin-Baden M. An introduction to qualitative research synthesis. In: Savin-Baden M, Major CH, editors. Making the case for qualitative research synthesis. New York: Routledge; 2010. p. 9–22.
25.
go back to reference Noblit G, Hare D. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1988.CrossRef Noblit G, Hare D. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1988.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Allen S, Carlson G. To conceal or disclose a disabling condition? A dilemma of employment transition. J Vocat Rehabil. 2003;19:19–30. Allen S, Carlson G. To conceal or disclose a disabling condition? A dilemma of employment transition. J Vocat Rehabil. 2003;19:19–30.
45.
go back to reference Toth K, Dewa C. Employee decision-making about disclosure of a mental disorder at work. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:732.CrossRef Toth K, Dewa C. Employee decision-making about disclosure of a mental disorder at work. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:732.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Southall K, Jennings M, Gagné J-P. Factors that influence disclosure of hearing loss in the workplace. Int J Audiol. 2011;50:699–707.CrossRef Southall K, Jennings M, Gagné J-P. Factors that influence disclosure of hearing loss in the workplace. Int J Audiol. 2011;50:699–707.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Reed K, Meade M, Jarnecke M, Rumrill P, Krause J. Disclosing disability in the employment setting: perspectives from workers with multiple sclerosis. J Vocat Rehabil. 2017;47:175–184.CrossRef Reed K, Meade M, Jarnecke M, Rumrill P, Krause J. Disclosing disability in the employment setting: perspectives from workers with multiple sclerosis. J Vocat Rehabil. 2017;47:175–184.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R-L, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:257–269.CrossRef MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R-L, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:257–269.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Gewurtz R, Kirsh B. Disruption, disbelief and resistance: a meta-synthesis of disability in the workplace. Work. 2009;34:33–44.CrossRef Gewurtz R, Kirsh B. Disruption, disbelief and resistance: a meta-synthesis of disability in the workplace. Work. 2009;34:33–44.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Ellison ML, Russinova Z, MacDonald-Wilson KL, Lyass A. Patterns and correlates of workplace disclosure among professionals and managers with psychiatric conditions. J Vocat Rehabil. 2003;18(1):3–13. Ellison ML, Russinova Z, MacDonald-Wilson KL, Lyass A. Patterns and correlates of workplace disclosure among professionals and managers with psychiatric conditions. J Vocat Rehabil. 2003;18(1):3–13.
69.
go back to reference Santuzzi AM, Keating RT, Martínez JJ, Finkelstein L, Rupp D, Strah N. Identity management strategies for workers with concealable disabilities: antecedents and consequences. J Soc Issues. 2019;75:847–880.CrossRef Santuzzi AM, Keating RT, Martínez JJ, Finkelstein L, Rupp D, Strah N. Identity management strategies for workers with concealable disabilities: antecedents and consequences. J Soc Issues. 2019;75:847–880.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Unravelling the Complexities of Workplace Disclosure Among Persons with Non-Visible Disabilities and Illnesses: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography
Authors
Vanessa Tomas
Hiba Ahmed
Sally Lindsay
Publication date
17-01-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10023-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2022 Go to the issue