Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2022

Open Access 04-06-2021 | Literature Review

Participant Engagement in Supported Employment: A Systematic Scoping Review

Authors: Mariya Khoronzhevych, Tatiana Maximova-Mentzoni, Erika Gubrium, Ashley Elizabeth Muller

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to synthesise the available knowledge on how participant engagement in supported employment (SE) interventions is presented, defined, and conceptualised. We also aimed to develop a working definition of participant engagement in SE based on the results of our study. Methods This systematic scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. The following databases were systematically searched: EBSCO, SCOPUS, Social Care Online, and JSTOR. We included peer-reviewed publications in English based on empirical studies. Results Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Thematic framework analysis resulted in three themes conveying the concept of participant engagement: self-determined choice, empowerment, and collaboration/working alliance. We suggest that participant engagement in SE is an active multifaceted process that involves the empowerment of participants, participants’ exercise of self-determined informed choice, and their collaboration with SE practitioners in a working alliance. Conclusions Participant empowerment, self-determined choice, and collaboration are important aspects of participant engagement in SE. The study results will appeal to SE practitioners and make significant contributions to the broader field of other vocational services supporting people in (re-)entering the competitive labour market.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Christle JW, Schlumberger A, Haller B, Gloeckl R, Halle M, Pressler A. Individualized vs. group exercise in improving quality of life and physical activity in patients with cardiac disease and low exercise capacity: results from the DOPPELHERZ trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(25):2566–2571.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Menchetti BM, Garcia LA. Personal and employment outcomes of person-centered career planning. Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2003;38(2):145–156.
3.
Bright FAS, Kayes NM, Worrall L, McPherson KM. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):643–654.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Williams MW, Rapport LJ, Hanks RA, Parker HA. Engagement in rehabilitation therapy and functional outcomes among individuals with acquired brain injuries. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(1):33–41.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
Kubina LA, Dubouloz CJ, Davis CG, Kessler D, Egan MY. The process of re-engagement in personally valued activities during the two years following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(3):236–243.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Kabel A, McBee-Black K, Dimka J. Apparel-related participation barriers: ability, adaptation and engagement. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(22):2184–2192.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Waghorn G, Childs S, Hampton E, Gladman B, Greaves A, Bowman D. Enhancing community mental health services through formal partnerships with supported employment providers. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2012;15(2):157–180.CrossRef
9.
Southwick JD, Schultz JC. Participant engagement in public vocational rehabilitation programs: an analysis of counselor ratings. J Rehabil. 2019;85(2):13–22.
10.
Dutta A, Chan F, Kundu MM, Kaya C, Brooks J, Sánchez J, Tansey TN. Assessing vocational rehabilitation engagement of people with disabilities: a factor-analytic approach. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2017;60(3):145–154.CrossRef
11.
Iwanaga K, Chan F, Tansey TN, Strauser D, Ritter E, Bishop M, Brooks J. Working alliance and stages of change for employment: the intermediary role of autonomous motivation, outcome expectancy and vocational rehabilitation engagement. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(2):315–324.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Suhonen R, Stolt M, Charalambous A. Supporting individualised nursing care by leadership. In: Suhonen R, Stolt M, Papastavrou E, editors. Individualized care: theory, measurement and practice. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 195–205.CrossRef
13.
Bishop M, Kayes N, McPherson K. Understanding the therapeutic alliance in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(8):1074–1083.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Johnson RL, Floyd M, Pilling D, Boyce MJ, Grove B, Secker J, Schneider J, Slade J. Service users’ perceptions of the effective ingredients in supported employment. J Ment Health. 2009;18(2):121–128.CrossRef
15.
Cogan AM, Carlson M. Deciphering participation: an interpretive synthesis of its meaning and application in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(22):2692–2703.PubMedCrossRef
16.
West M, Targett P, Wehman P, Cifu G, Davis J. Separation from supported employment: a retrospective chart review study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(12):1055–1059.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Bond GR. Supported employment: evidence for an evidence-based practice. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004;27(4):345–359.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Hoffmann H, Jäckel D, Glauser S, Mueser KT, Kupper Z. Long-term effectiveness of supported employment: 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(11):1183–1190.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Nøkleby H, Hernes T. Effekter av supported employment [The effects of supported employment]. Arbeid og velferd. 2017;2:65–76.
20.
Drake RE, Becker DR, Clark RE, Mueser KT. Research on the individual placement and support model of supported employment. Psychiatr Q. 1999;70(4):289–301.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Elinson L, Frey WD, Li T, Palan MA, Horne RL. Evaluation of customized employment in building the capacity of the workforce development system. J Vocat Rehabil. 2008;28(3):141–158.
22.
Porteous N, Waghorn G. Implementing evidence-based employment services in New Zealand for young adults with psychosis: progress during the first five years. Br J Occup Ther. 2007;70(12):521–526.CrossRef
23.
Waghorn G, Hielscher E. The availability of evidence-based practices in supported employment for Australians with severe and persistent mental illness. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(2):141–144.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Church HR, Seewald PM, Clark JM, Jak AJ, Twamley EW. Predictors of work outcomes following supported employment in veterans with a history of traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(3):333–339.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Pogoda TK, Carlson KF, Gormley KE, Resnick SG. Supported employment for veterans with traumatic brain injury: provider perspectives. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(2):S14–S22.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Sveinsdottir V, Bull HC, Evensen S, Reme SE, Knutzen T, Lystad JU. A short history of individual placement and support in Norway. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020;43(1):9–17.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Maximova-Mentzoni T. Supported employment i kvalifiseringstiltak for innvandrere. To år med metodeutprøving og metodeutvikling i åtte forsøksprosjekter [Supported employment as a qualification measure for immigrants. Two years of method testing and eevelopment in eight pilot projects]. Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (2019).
28.
29.
Manthey TJ. A pilot study of introductory motivational interviewing training for supported employment case managers. Int J Psychosoc Rehabil. 2013;18(1):133–138.
30.
Ståhl C, Gustavsson M. Introducing motivational interviewing in a sickness insurance context: translation and implementation challenges. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(2):357–364.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Hazler RJ. Person-centered theory. In: Capuzzi D, Gross DR, editors. Counseling and psychotherapy: theories and interventions. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.; 2007. p. 189–215.
32.
Rogers C. On becoming a person. New York: Constable & Robinson; 1967.
33.
34.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef
35.
36.
Bonfils IS, Hansen H, Dalum HS, Eplov LF. Implementation of the individual placement and support approach – facilitators and barriers. Scand J Disabil Res. 2017;19(4):318–333.CrossRef
37.
Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Huberman AM, Miles MB, editors. The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002. p. 305–329.CrossRef
38.
Nittrouer CL, Shogren KA, Pickens JL. Using a collaborative process to develop goals and self-management interventions to support young adults with disabilities at work. Rehabil Res Policy Educ. 2016;30(2):110–128.CrossRef
39.
McDermott S, Edwards R. Enabling self-determination for older workers with intellectual disabilities in supported employment in Australia. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2012;25(5):423–432.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Haslett WR, McHugo GJ, Bond GR, Drake RE. Use of software for tablet computers to promote engagement with supported employment: results from an RCT. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(7):954–956.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Bejerholm U, Björkman T. Empowerment in supported employment research and practice: Is it relevant? Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011;57(6):588–595.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Areberg C, Bejerholm U. The effect of IPS on participants’ engagement, quality of life, empowerment, and motivation: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20(6):420–428.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Blankertz L, Staines GL, Magura S, Madison EM, Horowitz E, Spinelli M, McKenzie A, Bali P, Guarino H, Grand A, Young R, Fong C. The Customized Employment Supports (CES) model of vocational rehabilitation for methadone treatment patients. J Vocat Rehabil. 2003;19(3):143–155.
44.
Blankertz L, Magura S, Staines GL, Madison EM, Spinelli M, Horowitz E. A new work placement model for unemployed methadone maintenance patients. Subst Use Misuse. 2004;39(13–14):2239–2260.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Wehmeyer ML, Parent W, Lattimore J, Obremski S, Poston D, Rousso H. Promoting self-determination and self-directed employment planning for young women with disabilities. J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2009;8(3/4):117–131.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Brady MP, Rosenberg H, Frain MP. A self-evaluation instrument for work performance and support needs. Career Dev Except Individ. 2008;31(3):175–185.CrossRef
47.
Larson JE, Sheehan L, Ryan C, Lemp S, Drandorff L. Practitioner perspectives on Individual Placement and Support (IPS) for individuals with serious mental illness. J Vocat Rehabil. 2014;41(3):225–235.CrossRef
48.
Johanson S, Markström U, Bejerholm U. Enabling the return-to-work process among people with affective disorders: a multiple-case study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;26(3):205–218.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Kilsby M, Bennert K, Beyer S. Measuring and reducing acquiescence in vocational profiling procedures for first time job-seekers with mental retardation. J Vocat Rehabil. 2002;17(4):287–299.
50.
Kilsby MS, Beyer S. Enhancing self-determination in job matching in supported employment for people with learning disabilities: an intervention study. J Vocat Rehabil. 2002;17(2):125–135.
51.
Kilsby MS, Beyer S. Engagement and interaction: a comparison between supported employment and day service provision. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1996;40(4):348–357.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Kostick KM, Whitley R, Bush PW. Client-centeredness in supported employment: specialist and supervisor perspectives. J Ment Health. 2010;19(6):523–531.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Solar A. A Supported Employment linkage intervention for people with schizophrenia who want to work: a survey of patients’ views. Australas Psychiatry. 2015;23(2):163–165.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Kilsby M, Beyer S. Engagement and interaction: a comparison between supported employment and ATCs. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 1996;6(2):141–152.CrossRef
55.
Johanson S, Markström U, Bejerholm U. Enabling the return-to-work process among people with affective disorders: a multiple-case study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019;26(3):205–218.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Breeding RR. Empowerment as a function of contextual self-understanding: the effect of work interest profiling on career decision self-efficacy and work locus of control. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2008;51(2):96–106.CrossRef
57.
Kosciulek JF, Wheaton JE. Rehabilitation counseling with individuals with disabilities: an empowerment framework [Editorial]. Rehabil Ed. 2003;17(4):207–214.
58.
McCormack B, McCance T. Person-centred nursing: theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Participant Engagement in Supported Employment: A Systematic Scoping Review
Authors
Mariya Khoronzhevych
Tatiana Maximova-Mentzoni
Erika Gubrium
Ashley Elizabeth Muller
Publication date
04-06-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09987-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2022 Go to the issue

Literature Review

The Dutch Multidisciplinary Occupational Health Guideline to Enhance Work Participation Among Low Back Pain and Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome Patients

OriginalPaper

A Standpoint Approach to Return-to-Work Coordination: Understanding Union Roles

Review

Unravelling the Complexities of Workplace Disclosure Among Persons with Non-Visible Disabilities and Illnesses: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography

OriginalPaper

Minds@Work: A New Manualized Intervention to Improve Job Tenure in Psychosis Based on Scoping Review and Logic Model

Editorial

Referring to Workers Within Work Disability Prevention Research: Person-First or Identify-First?

Review

Employment Sustainability for People with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review