Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 11/2017

01-11-2017 | Original Article

Understanding patients’ preferences for surgical management of urethral stricture disease

Authors: Lindsay A. Hampson, Tracy K. Lin, Leslie Wilson, Isabel E. Allen, Thomas W. Gaither, Benjamin N. Breyer

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To understand how prioritization of treatment attributes and treatment choice varies by patient characteristics, we sought to specifically determine how demographic variables affect patient treatment preference.

Patients and methods

Male patients with urethral stricture disease participated in a choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis exercise evaluating six treatment attributes associated with internal urethrotomy and urethroplasty. Demographic and past symptom data were collected. Stratified analysis of demographic variables, including age, education, income, was conducted using a mixed effect logistic regression model to evaluate the coefficient size and confidence intervals between the treatments attribute preferences of each strata.

Results

169 patients completed the CBC exercise and were included in our analysis. Overall success of the procedure is the most important treatment attribute to patients and this persists across strata. Older patients (≥65) express preferences for better success rates and fewer future procedures, whereas younger patients prefer a less invasive approach and are more willing to accept additional procedures if needed. Patients with lower levels of education preferred open reconstruction and had a stronger preference against multiple future procedures, whereas those with higher levels of education preferred endoscopic treatment and had a less strong preference against multiple future procedures. Low-income individuals express statistically significant stronger negative preferences against high copay costs compared to high-income individuals.

Conclusion

These results can help to inform physicians’ counseling about surgical management of urethral stricture disease to better align patient preferences with treatment selection and encourage shared decision making.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
11.
go back to reference Silverman S, Calderon A, Kaw K et al (2013) Patient weighting of osteoporosis medication attributes across racial and ethnic groups: a study of osteoporosis medication preferences using conjoint analysis. Osteoporos Int 24:2067–2077. doi:10.1007/s00198-012-2241-1 CrossRefPubMed Silverman S, Calderon A, Kaw K et al (2013) Patient weighting of osteoporosis medication attributes across racial and ethnic groups: a study of osteoporosis medication preferences using conjoint analysis. Osteoporos Int 24:2067–2077. doi:10.​1007/​s00198-012-2241-1 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wilson L, Lin TK, Hampson LA et al (2017) Use of conjoint analysis to determine patient preferences for surgical treatment of urethral stricture disease. J Particip Med 9:e1 Wilson L, Lin TK, Hampson LA et al (2017) Use of conjoint analysis to determine patient preferences for surgical treatment of urethral stricture disease. J Particip Med 9:e1
20.
go back to reference Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott SP et al (2016) Male urethral stricture: American urological association. J Urol 197(1):182–190CrossRefPubMed Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott SP et al (2016) Male urethral stricture: American urological association. J Urol 197(1):182–190CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kessler TM, Fisch M, Heitz M et al (2002) Patient satisfaction with the outcome of surgery for urethral stricture. J Urol 167:2507–2511CrossRefPubMed Kessler TM, Fisch M, Heitz M et al (2002) Patient satisfaction with the outcome of surgery for urethral stricture. J Urol 167:2507–2511CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Understanding patients’ preferences for surgical management of urethral stricture disease
Authors
Lindsay A. Hampson
Tracy K. Lin
Leslie Wilson
Isabel E. Allen
Thomas W. Gaither
Benjamin N. Breyer
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2066-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

World Journal of Urology 11/2017 Go to the issue