Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 7/2013

01-07-2013 | Original Article

Patient weighting of osteoporosis medication attributes across racial and ethnic groups: a study of osteoporosis medication preferences using conjoint analysis

Authors: S. Silverman, A. Calderon, K. Kaw, T. B. Childers, B. A. Stafford, W. Brynildsen, A. Focil, M. Koenig, D. T. Gold

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

We studied the ranking of osteoporosis (OP) medication attributes in a convenience sample of four different racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Our study showed that postmenopausal women differ in the ranking of OP medication attributes based on age, educational level, income, and prior fracture history.

Introduction

Decision making about OP medication-related behavior relies heavily on patient preferences about specific medication attributes. Patients may decide to initiate, change, or stop therapies based on ranking of perceived attributes of the therapy and their personal attitudes toward those attributes. We used MaxDiff, a form of conjoint analysis (Ryan and Farrar 2000), to explore patient weighting of attributes across four racial/ethnic groups at two sites in the United States and defined four critical attributes that influence such decisions (safety, efficacy, cost, and convenience) from qualitative interviews.

Methods

We recruited a sample of 367 Postmenopausal (PM) women at risk of OP fractures from four racial/ethnic groups: Caucasian (n = 100), African American (n = 100), Asian American (n = 82), and Hispanic American (n = 85). Respondents completed a laptop-based questionnaire that included demographic items, several short scales on medical care preference and OP patient perceptions, and a MaxDiff procedure that determines comparative ranking of attributes either as least important or most important to their decisions.

Results

MaxDiff analyses were done to evaluate the relative weight of specific statements for each participant and to determine whether racial/ethnic groups differed across dimensions. Overall, participants in all four groups rated efficacy > safety > cost > convenience.

Conclusions

Although there were no significant differences among the racial/ethnic groups on overall ranking of attributes, subgroup analyses revealed significant impact of age, education, income, and prior fracture on these decisions. The findings from this study suggest that postmenopausal women differ in their ranking of OP medication attributes, and healthcare providers must account for personal preferences in their communication about and selection of OP medications.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D (2006) Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum 55(5):729–735CrossRefPubMed Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D (2006) Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum 55(5):729–735CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D (2007) Patient willingness to take teriparatide. Patient Educ Couns 65(2):237–244CrossRefPubMed Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D (2007) Patient willingness to take teriparatide. Patient Educ Couns 65(2):237–244CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Barry MJ (2011) Helping patients make better personal decisions: the promise of patient centered health outcomes research. JAMA 306:1258–1259CrossRefPubMed Barry MJ (2011) Helping patients make better personal decisions: the promise of patient centered health outcomes research. JAMA 306:1258–1259CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, et al. (2009) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3:CD 001431 O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, et al. (2009) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3:CD 001431
5.
go back to reference de Bekker-Grob E, Essink-Bot M, Meerding W, Koes B, Steyerberg E (2009) Preferences of GPs and patients for preventive osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. PharmacoEconomics 27(3):211–219CrossRefPubMed de Bekker-Grob E, Essink-Bot M, Meerding W, Koes B, Steyerberg E (2009) Preferences of GPs and patients for preventive osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. PharmacoEconomics 27(3):211–219CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lee S, Glendenning P, Inderjeeth C (2011) Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009. Osteoporos Int 22(3):741–753CrossRefPubMed Lee S, Glendenning P, Inderjeeth C (2011) Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009. Osteoporos Int 22(3):741–753CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Constantinescu F, Goucher S, Weinstein A, Fraenkel L (2009) Racial disparities in treatment preferences for rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care 47(3):350–355CrossRefPubMed Constantinescu F, Goucher S, Weinstein A, Fraenkel L (2009) Racial disparities in treatment preferences for rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care 47(3):350–355CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Constantinescu F, Goucher S, Weinstein A, Smith W, Fraenkel L (2009) Understanding why rheumatoid arthritis patient treatment preferences differ by race. Arthritis Rheum 61(4):413–418CrossRefPubMed Constantinescu F, Goucher S, Weinstein A, Smith W, Fraenkel L (2009) Understanding why rheumatoid arthritis patient treatment preferences differ by race. Arthritis Rheum 61(4):413–418CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Piette J, Heisler M, Harand A, Juip M (2010) Beliefs about prescription medications among patients with diabetes: variation across racial groups and influences on cost-related medication underuse. J Health Care Poor Underserved 21(1):349–361CrossRefPubMed Piette J, Heisler M, Harand A, Juip M (2010) Beliefs about prescription medications among patients with diabetes: variation across racial groups and influences on cost-related medication underuse. J Health Care Poor Underserved 21(1):349–361CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Qato D, Lindau S, Conti R, Schumm L, Alexander G (2010) Racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular medication use among older adults in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 19(8):834–842CrossRefPubMed Qato D, Lindau S, Conti R, Schumm L, Alexander G (2010) Racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular medication use among older adults in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 19(8):834–842CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fraenkel L, Constantinescu F, Oberto-Medina M, Wittink DR (2005) Women’s preferences for prevention of bone loss. J Rheumatol 32(6):1086–1092PubMed Fraenkel L, Constantinescu F, Oberto-Medina M, Wittink DR (2005) Women’s preferences for prevention of bone loss. J Rheumatol 32(6):1086–1092PubMed
12.
go back to reference Darbà J, Restovic G, Kaskens L, Balbona MA, Carbonell A, Cavero P, Jordana M, Prieto C, Molina A, Padró I (2011) Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1947–1954CrossRefPubMed Darbà J, Restovic G, Kaskens L, Balbona MA, Carbonell A, Cavero P, Jordana M, Prieto C, Molina A, Padró I (2011) Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1947–1954CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Marshall D, Bridges J, Johnson F et al (2010) Conjoint analysis applications in health—how are studies being designed and reported?: an update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient 3(4):249–256CrossRefPubMed Marshall D, Bridges J, Johnson F et al (2010) Conjoint analysis applications in health—how are studies being designed and reported?: an update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient 3(4):249–256CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ryan M, McIntosh E, Shackley P (1998) Using conjoint analysis to assess consumer preferences in primary care: an application to the patient health card. Heal Expect 1:11729 Ryan M, McIntosh E, Shackley P (1998) Using conjoint analysis to assess consumer preferences in primary care: an application to the patient health card. Heal Expect 1:11729
15.
go back to reference Orme B (2009) Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Second edition. Research Pub Lic, Madison Orme B (2009) Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Second edition. Research Pub Lic, Madison
16.
go back to reference Ryan M, Farrar S (2000) Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. Br Med J 320(1):1530–1533CrossRef Ryan M, Farrar S (2000) Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. Br Med J 320(1):1530–1533CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cadarette SM, Gignac MAM, Jaglal SB et al (2009) Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. BMC Res Notes 2:133CrossRefPubMed Cadarette SM, Gignac MAM, Jaglal SB et al (2009) Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. BMC Res Notes 2:133CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ganther JM, Wiederholt JB, Kreling DH (2001) Measuring patients’ medical care preferences: care seeking versus self-treating. Med Dec Making 21(2):133–140 Ganther JM, Wiederholt JB, Kreling DH (2001) Measuring patients’ medical care preferences: care seeking versus self-treating. Med Dec Making 21(2):133–140
19.
go back to reference Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2003) Hierarchical models. In: Part II: fundamentals for Bayesian data analysis: Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2003) Hierarchical models. In: Part II: fundamentals for Bayesian data analysis: Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Metadata
Title
Patient weighting of osteoporosis medication attributes across racial and ethnic groups: a study of osteoporosis medication preferences using conjoint analysis
Authors
S. Silverman
A. Calderon
K. Kaw
T. B. Childers
B. A. Stafford
W. Brynildsen
A. Focil
M. Koenig
D. T. Gold
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2241-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Osteoporosis International 7/2013 Go to the issue