Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Understanding changes and stability in the long-term use of technologies by seniors who are aging in place: a dynamical framework

Authors: S. T. M. Peek, K. G. Luijkx, H. J. M. Vrijhoef, M. E. Nieboer, S. Aarts, C. S. van der Voort, M. D. Rijnaard, E. J. M. Wouters

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

If technologies are to support aging in place, then it is important to develop fundamental knowledge on what causes stability and changes in the use of technologies by seniors. However, longitudinal studies on the long-term use of technologies that have been accepted into the home (i.e., post-implementation use) are very scarce. Many factors potentially could influence post-implementation use, including life events, age-related decline, changes in personal goal orientation, and various types of social influences. The aforementioned factors are likely to be interrelated, adding to the complexity. The goal of this study is to better understand changes and stability in the use of technologies by independent-living seniors, by using a dynamical systems theory approach.

Methods

A longitudinal qualitative field study was conducted involving home visits to 33 community-dwelling seniors in the Netherlands, on three occasions (2012–2014). Interviews were held on technology usage patterns, including reasons for stable, increased, declined and stopped use. Technologies were included if they required electric power in order to function, were intended to be used in or around the home, and could support activities of daily living, personal health or safety, mobility, communication, and physical activity. Thematic analysis was employed, using constant case comparison to better understand dynamics and interplay between factors. In total, 148 technology use patterns by 33 participants were analyzed.

Results

A core of six interrelated factors was closely linked to the frequency of technology use: emotional attachment, need compatibility, cues to use, proficiency to use, input of resources, and support. Additionally, disruptive forces (e.g., social influences, competition with alternative means, changes of personal needs) could induce change by affecting these six factors. Furthermore, long-term technology use was in some cases more resilient to disruption than in other cases. Findings were accumulated in a new framework: Dynamics In Technology Use by Seniors (DITUS).

Conclusions

Similar to aging, the use of technologies by older people is complex, dynamic and personal. Periods of stability and change both occur naturally. The DITUS framework can aid in understanding stability and instability of technology use, and in developing and implementing sustainable technological solutions for aging in place.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
As suggested by Gobbens et al. [32] a Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) score of 5 was used as the cut-off point for frailty.
 
2
As suggested by Kempen, Brilman and Ormel [28] a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 24 was used as the cut-off point for cognitive impairment.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference United Nations. World Population Ageing. United Nations: New York; 2015. United Nations. World Population Ageing. United Nations: New York; 2015.
2.
go back to reference Davey J, Nana G, Joux V, Arcus M. Accommodation options for older people in Aotearoa/New Zealand. New Zealand: Wellington; 2004. Davey J, Nana G, Joux V, Arcus M. Accommodation options for older people in Aotearoa/New Zealand. New Zealand: Wellington; 2004.
3.
go back to reference Smits CHM, van den Beld HK, Aartsen MJ, Schroots JJF. Aging in The Netherlands: state of the art and science. Gerontologist. 2013;54(3):1–9.CrossRef Smits CHM, van den Beld HK, Aartsen MJ, Schroots JJF. Aging in The Netherlands: state of the art and science. Gerontologist. 2013;54(3):1–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wiles JL, Leibing A, Guberman N, Reeve J, Allen RES. The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontologist. 2012;52:357–66.CrossRef Wiles JL, Leibing A, Guberman N, Reeve J, Allen RES. The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontologist. 2012;52:357–66.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Agree EM. The potential for technology to enhance independence for those aging with a disability. Disabil Health J. 2014;7:S33–9 Elsevier Inc.CrossRef Agree EM. The potential for technology to enhance independence for those aging with a disability. Disabil Health J. 2014;7:S33–9 Elsevier Inc.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim K, Gollamudi SS, Steinhubl S. Digital technology to enable aging in place. Exp Gerontol. 2017;88:25–31.CrossRef Kim K, Gollamudi SS, Steinhubl S. Digital technology to enable aging in place. Exp Gerontol. 2017;88:25–31.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJM. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:235–48.CrossRef Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJM. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:235–48.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Orlov LM. Technology for Aging in place: 2016 market overview. Aging in Place Technology Watch; 2016. Orlov LM. Technology for Aging in place: 2016 market overview. Aging in Place Technology Watch; 2016.
9.
go back to reference Peek STM, Luijkx KG, Rijnaard MD, Nieboer ME, van der Voort CS, Aarts S, et al. Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology. 2016;62:226–37.CrossRef Peek STM, Luijkx KG, Rijnaard MD, Nieboer ME, van der Voort CS, Aarts S, et al. Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology. 2016;62:226–37.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rogers WA, Mayhorn BC, Fisk AD. Technology in Everyday Life for Older adults. In: Burdick DC, Kwon S, editors. Gerotechnology: research and practice in technology and aging. New York: Springer; 2004. p. 3–17. Rogers WA, Mayhorn BC, Fisk AD. Technology in Everyday Life for Older adults. In: Burdick DC, Kwon S, editors. Gerotechnology: research and practice in technology and aging. New York: Springer; 2004. p. 3–17.
11.
13.
go back to reference Sorgenfrei C, Ebner K, Smolnik S, Jennex M. From acceptance to outcome: towards an integrative framework for information technology adoption. In: Avital M, Leimeister JM, Schultze U, editors. 22nd European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2014, Tel Aviv, Israel, June 9-11, 2014. 2014. Sorgenfrei C, Ebner K, Smolnik S, Jennex M. From acceptance to outcome: towards an integrative framework for information technology adoption. In: Avital M, Leimeister JM, Schultze U, editors. 22nd European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2014, Tel Aviv, Israel, June 9-11, 2014. 2014.
14.
go back to reference Liu L, Stroulia E, Nikolaidis I, Cruz AM, Rincon AR. Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;91:44–59 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.CrossRef Liu L, Stroulia E, Nikolaidis I, Cruz AM, Rincon AR. Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;91:44–59 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Shaw S, Wherton J, Hughes G, Lynch J, A’Court C, et al. SCALS: a fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010208.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Shaw S, Wherton J, Hughes G, Lynch J, A’Court C, et al. SCALS: a fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010208.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chen K, Chan AHSS. A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology. 2011;10:1–12. Chen K, Chan AHSS. A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology. 2011;10:1–12.
17.
go back to reference Schulz R, Wahl H-W, Matthews JT, De Vito DA, Beach SR, Czaja SJ. Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist. 2015;55:724–34.CrossRef Schulz R, Wahl H-W, Matthews JT, De Vito DA, Beach SR, Czaja SJ. Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist. 2015;55:724–34.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Luijkx K, Peek S, Wouters E. “Grandma , You Should Do It — It’s Cool” Older Adults and the Role of Family Members in Their Acceptance of Technology. Int J Environ Res an Public Heal. 2015;12:15470–85.CrossRef Luijkx K, Peek S, Wouters E. “Grandma , You Should Do It — It’s Cool” Older Adults and the Role of Family Members in Their Acceptance of Technology. Int J Environ Res an Public Heal. 2015;12:15470–85.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94 Elsevier Ltd.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94 Elsevier Ltd.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Butner J. Dynamical Systems Theory. In: Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, editors. Encyclopedia of Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2007. p. 272. Butner J. Dynamical Systems Theory. In: Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, editors. Encyclopedia of Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2007. p. 272.
21.
go back to reference Guastello SJ, Koopmans M, Pincus D, editors. Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Guastello SJ, Koopmans M, Pincus D, editors. Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
22.
go back to reference Gelfand LA, Engelhart S. Dynamical systems theory in psychology: assistance for the lay reader is required. Front Psychol. 2012;3:382.CrossRef Gelfand LA, Engelhart S. Dynamical systems theory in psychology: assistance for the lay reader is required. Front Psychol. 2012;3:382.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vallacher RR, Nowak A. Dynamical social psychology: finding order in the flow of human experience. In: Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, editors. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Publications; 2007. p. 734–58. Vallacher RR, Nowak A. Dynamical social psychology: finding order in the flow of human experience. In: Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, editors. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Publications; 2007. p. 734–58.
24.
go back to reference Scheffer M. Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Universiy Press; 2009. Scheffer M. Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Universiy Press; 2009.
25.
go back to reference Watters PA, Ball PJ, Carr SC. Social processes as dynamical processes: qualitative dynamical systems theory in social psychology. Curr Res Soc Psychol. 1996;1:60–8. Watters PA, Ball PJ, Carr SC. Social processes as dynamical processes: qualitative dynamical systems theory in social psychology. Curr Res Soc Psychol. 1996;1:60–8.
26.
go back to reference Peek STM, Luijkx KG, Vrijhoef HJM, Nieboer ME, Aarts S, Van Der Voort CS, et al. Origins and consequences of technology acquirement by independent-living seniors: towards an integrative model. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17:189.CrossRef Peek STM, Luijkx KG, Vrijhoef HJM, Nieboer ME, Aarts S, Van Der Voort CS, et al. Origins and consequences of technology acquirement by independent-living seniors: towards an integrative model. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17:189.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Saldana J. Longitudinal qualitative research. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2003. Saldana J. Longitudinal qualitative research. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2003.
28.
go back to reference Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.CrossRef Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kempen GIJM, Brilman EI, Ormel J. De Mini-Mental State Examination. Normeringsgegevens en een vergelijking van een 12- en 20- item versie in een steekproef ouderen uit de bevolking. Tijdschr Geront Geriatr. 1995;26:163–72. Kempen GIJM, Brilman EI, Ormel J. De Mini-Mental State Examination. Normeringsgegevens en een vergelijking van een 12- en 20- item versie in een steekproef ouderen uit de bevolking. Tijdschr Geront Geriatr. 1995;26:163–72.
30.
go back to reference Luppa M, Luck T, Weyerer S, König H-H, Brähler E, Riedel-Heller SG. Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. A systematic review. Age Ageing. 2010;39:31–8.CrossRef Luppa M, Luck T, Weyerer S, König H-H, Brähler E, Riedel-Heller SG. Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. A systematic review. Age Ageing. 2010;39:31–8.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gaugler JE, Duval S, Anderson KA, Kane RL. Predicting nursing home admission in the U.S: a meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7:13.CrossRef Gaugler JE, Duval S, Anderson KA, Kane RL. Predicting nursing home admission in the U.S: a meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7:13.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Gobbens RJJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. The Tilburg frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. Elsevier Ltd. 2010;11:344–55.CrossRef Gobbens RJJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. The Tilburg frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. Elsevier Ltd. 2010;11:344–55.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Boeije H. Analysis in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications; 2010. Boeije H. Analysis in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications; 2010.
34.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Fram SM. The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. Qual Rep. 2013;18:1–25. Fram SM. The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. Qual Rep. 2013;18:1–25.
36.
go back to reference Nevedal AL, Ayalon L, Briller SH. A qualitative evidence synthesis review of longitudinal qualitative research in gerontology. Gerontologist. 2018:1–11. Nevedal AL, Ayalon L, Briller SH. A qualitative evidence synthesis review of longitudinal qualitative research in gerontology. Gerontologist. 2018:1–11.
37.
go back to reference Maxwell JJA. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harv Educ Rev. 1992;62:279–300.CrossRef Maxwell JJA. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harv Educ Rev. 1992;62:279–300.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference de Graaf MMA, Ben AS, Van Dijk JAGM. Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. Interact Stud. 2016;17:461–90.CrossRef de Graaf MMA, Ben AS, Van Dijk JAGM. Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. Interact Stud. 2016;17:461–90.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Karapanos E, Zimmerman J, Forlizzi J, Martens J. User experience over time : An initial framework; 2009. p. 729–38. Karapanos E, Zimmerman J, Forlizzi J, Martens J. User experience over time : An initial framework; 2009. p. 729–38.
40.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci. 2008;39:273–315.CrossRef Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci. 2008;39:273–315.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13:319–40.CrossRef Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13:319–40.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46:186–204.CrossRef Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46:186–204.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27:425–78.CrossRef Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27:425–78.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012;36:157–78.CrossRef Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012;36:157–78.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Renaud K, Van Biljon J. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study: SAICSIT. New York: ACM; 2008. p. 210–9. Renaud K, Van Biljon J. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study: SAICSIT. New York: ACM; 2008. p. 210–9.
46.
go back to reference Chen K, Chan AHS. Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics. 2014;57:635–52.CrossRef Chen K, Chan AHS. Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics. 2014;57:635–52.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 2001;25:351–70.CrossRef Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 2001;25:351–70.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Piper AM, Garcia RC, Brewer RN. Understanding the challenges and opportunities of smart Mobile devices among the oldest old. Int J Mob Hum Comput Interact. 2016;8:83–98.CrossRef Piper AM, Garcia RC, Brewer RN. Understanding the challenges and opportunities of smart Mobile devices among the oldest old. Int J Mob Hum Comput Interact. 2016;8:83–98.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
50.
go back to reference Nowak A. Dynamical minimalism: why less is more in psychology. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8:183–92.CrossRef Nowak A. Dynamical minimalism: why less is more in psychology. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8:183–92.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Riikonen M, Paavilainen E, Salo H. Factors supporting the use of technology in daily life of home-living people with dementia, vol. 25; 2013. p. 233–43. Riikonen M, Paavilainen E, Salo H. Factors supporting the use of technology in daily life of home-living people with dementia, vol. 25; 2013. p. 233–43.
52.
go back to reference Rosenberg L, Nygård L. Learning and knowing technology as lived experience in people with Alzheimer’s disease: a phenomenological study. Aging Ment Health. 2016;7863:1–8. Rosenberg L, Nygård L. Learning and knowing technology as lived experience in people with Alzheimer’s disease: a phenomenological study. Aging Ment Health. 2016;7863:1–8.
53.
go back to reference Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, editors. Success. aging Perspect. from Behav Sci. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 1–34. Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, editors. Success. aging Perspect. from Behav Sci. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 1–34.
54.
go back to reference Whitworth B. The social requirements of technical systems. In: Whitworth B, de Moor A, editors. Handb. Res. Socio-Technical Des. Soc. Netw. Syst. IGI Global; 2009. p. 2–22. Whitworth B. The social requirements of technical systems. In: Whitworth B, de Moor A, editors. Handb. Res. Socio-Technical Des. Soc. Netw. Syst. IGI Global; 2009. p. 2–22.
55.
go back to reference Trist EL. The evolution of socio-technical systems : a conceptual framework and an action research program. Ontario: Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre; 1981. Trist EL. The evolution of socio-technical systems : a conceptual framework and an action research program. Ontario: Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre; 1981.
56.
go back to reference Huber MAS, Knottnerus JA, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AJ, Kromhout D, et al. How should we define health? Br Med J. 2011;343:1–3.CrossRef Huber MAS, Knottnerus JA, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AJ, Kromhout D, et al. How should we define health? Br Med J. 2011;343:1–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Understanding changes and stability in the long-term use of technologies by seniors who are aging in place: a dynamical framework
Authors
S. T. M. Peek
K. G. Luijkx
H. J. M. Vrijhoef
M. E. Nieboer
S. Aarts
C. S. van der Voort
M. D. Rijnaard
E. J. M. Wouters
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1241-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Geriatrics 1/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.