Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Ultrasound | Study protocol

Intertruncal versus classical approach to the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery: study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial

Authors: Quehua Luo, Yujing Cai, Hanbin Xie, Guoliang Sun, Jianqiang Guan, Yi Zhu, Weifeng Yao, Haihua Shu

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ultrasound-guided intertruncal approach (IA) to the supraclavicular block (SB) is recently proposed as a new approach for local anesthetic (LA) injection in terms of the classical approach (CA) at the level of the first rib. The CA-SB has been proven to result in satisfying sensorimotor block, but associate with a high risk of intraneural injection. The aim of this randomized non-inferiority study is to explore whether IA-SB can obtain similar block dynamics, as the CA-SB, but avoiding an intraneural injection during the whole nerve block procedure.

Methods

The total 122 patients undergoing elective upper extremity surgery will be randomly allocated to receive either an IA-SB or a CA-SB using a double-injection (DI) technique. In the IA-SB group, a portion of LA (15 mL) is injected accurately to the intertruncal plane between the middle and lower trunks under real-time ultrasound guidance; then, the remaining volume (10 mL) is carefully distributed to the other intertruncal plane between the upper and middle trunks. In the CA-SB group, the DI technique will be carried out as described in Tran’s study. The primary outcome is the percentage of patients with a complete sensory blockade at 20 min with a predefined non-inferiority margin of − 5%. The secondary outcomes include the sensory-motor blockade of all 4 terminal nerves, onset times of the individual nerves within 30 min, block-related variables, and adverse events.

Discussion

The results will provide sensory-motor blockade-related parameters and safety of the ultrasound-guided intertruncal approach to the supraclavicular block, thereby promoting clinical practice.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000040199​. Registered on 25 November 2020
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference D'Souza RS, Johnson RL. Supraclavicular block. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020. D'Souza RS, Johnson RL. Supraclavicular block. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020.
2.
go back to reference Pester JM, Varacallo M. Brachial plexus block techniques. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020. Pester JM, Varacallo M. Brachial plexus block techniques. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020.
8.
go back to reference Choi JJ, Kwak HJ, Jung WS, et al. Sonographic guidance for supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks: single vs. double injection cluster approach. Pain Physician. 2017;20(6):529–35 [published Online First: 2017/09/22].PubMed Choi JJ, Kwak HJ, Jung WS, et al. Sonographic guidance for supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks: single vs. double injection cluster approach. Pain Physician. 2017;20(6):529–35 [published Online First: 2017/09/22].PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lee JY, Park HY, Choi YS, et al. A randomized comparison between two injections from two planes versus two injections with a uniplanar approach for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block. Pain Physician. 2021;24(1):E15–21 [published Online First: 2021/01/06].PubMed Lee JY, Park HY, Choi YS, et al. A randomized comparison between two injections from two planes versus two injections with a uniplanar approach for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block. Pain Physician. 2021;24(1):E15–21 [published Online First: 2021/01/06].PubMed
25.
Metadata
Title
Intertruncal versus classical approach to the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery: study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial
Authors
Quehua Luo
Yujing Cai
Hanbin Xie
Guoliang Sun
Jianqiang Guan
Yi Zhu
Weifeng Yao
Haihua Shu
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06029-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue