Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Pyelonephritis | Study protocol

Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous renal biopsy: study protocol for a prospective randomized trial

Authors: Kensei Yahata, Akihiro Yoshimoto, Chiharu Kinoshita, Koichi Seta, Tatsuo Tsukamoto, Motoko Yanagita, Hiroaki Hata, Naoki Sakane

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The major complication of renal biopsy is bleeding. Infection is an extremely rare complication of percutaneous renal biopsy, providing sterile techniques are used and bowel perforation does not occur. However, the questionnaire included in the Kidney Biopsy Guidebook 2020 in Japan reported that antibiotic prophylaxis was administered to patients undergoing percutaneous renal biopsy at 61% of 170 adult institutions and 57% of 54 pediatric institutions. The objective of this study is to show the non-inferiority of not administering antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous renal biopsy.

Methods

Patients aged ≥15 years who are scheduled to undergo percutaneous renal biopsy are eligible for inclusion in the study. Three hundred and sixty-four patients will be recruited at 6 hospitals. The patients will be randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either a single dose of intravenous cefazolin (1 g) or no antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome is the number of patients that exhibit positive urine cultures (>105 colony-forming units/ml) 3 or 4 days after the renal biopsy, or at which point the patients are diagnosed with pyelonephritis until 3 or 4 days after the renal biopsy. The secondary outcomes are the number of patients who are diagnosed with pyelonephritis within 30 days after the renal biopsy, the number of patients who are diagnosed with puncture site infections within 30 days after the renal biopsy, the number of patients who are diagnosed with an infection other than pyelonephritis or a puncture site infection within 30 days after the renal biopsy, and the number of patients who experience cefazolin-induced side effects.

Discussion

This randomized controlled trial aims to show the non-inferiority of not administering antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous renal biopsy. If this study shows that antibiotic prophylaxis is not needed, it would help to ensure patient safety and prevent the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Trial registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000042378. Registered on 7 Nov 2020.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hogan JJ, Mocanu M, Berns JS. The native kidney biopsy: update and evidence for best practice. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:354–62.CrossRef Hogan JJ, Mocanu M, Berns JS. The native kidney biopsy: update and evidence for best practice. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:354–62.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kidney biopsy guidebook 2020 in Japan questionnaire. In: Committee of Practical Guide for Kidney Biopsy 2020 in Japanese Society of Nephrology, editors. Kidney biopsy guidebook 2020 in Japan. Tokyo: Tokyo Igakusha; 2020. p. 115 (in Japanese) Kidney biopsy guidebook 2020 in Japan questionnaire. In: Committee of Practical Guide for Kidney Biopsy 2020 in Japanese Society of Nephrology, editors. Kidney biopsy guidebook 2020 in Japan. Tokyo: Tokyo Igakusha; 2020. p. 115 (in Japanese)
3.
go back to reference Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70:195–283.CrossRef Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70:195–283.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:784–91.CrossRef Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:784–91.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Optimal timing for preoperative surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. In: Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Geneva: © World Health Organization 2016; 2016. p. 71-5 Optimal timing for preoperative surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. In: Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Geneva: © World Health Organization 2016; 2016. p. 71-5
6.
go back to reference Parrish AE. Complications of percutaneous renal biopsy: a review of 37 years' experience. Clin Nephrol. 1992;38:135–41.PubMed Parrish AE. Complications of percutaneous renal biopsy: a review of 37 years' experience. Clin Nephrol. 1992;38:135–41.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kark RM, Muehrcke RC, Pollak VE, Pirani CL, Kiefer JH. An analysis of five hundred percutaneous renal biopsies. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1958;101:439–51.CrossRef Kark RM, Muehrcke RC, Pollak VE, Pirani CL, Kiefer JH. An analysis of five hundred percutaneous renal biopsies. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1958;101:439–51.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lee DA, Roger R, Agre KM, Rubini M. Late complications of percutaneous renal biopsy. J Urol. 1967;97:793–7.CrossRef Lee DA, Roger R, Agre KM, Rubini M. Late complications of percutaneous renal biopsy. J Urol. 1967;97:793–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, Kuntz G, Pegues DA. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:319–26.CrossRef Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, Kuntz G, Pegues DA. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:319–26.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous renal biopsy: study protocol for a prospective randomized trial
Authors
Kensei Yahata
Akihiro Yoshimoto
Chiharu Kinoshita
Koichi Seta
Tatsuo Tsukamoto
Motoko Yanagita
Hiroaki Hata
Naoki Sakane
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06618-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue