Top

The Ultrasound Journal

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Ultrasound | Review

High-frequency ultrasound in clinical dermatology: a review

Authors: Jack Levy, Devon L. Barrett, Nile Harris, Jiwoong Jason Jeong, Xiaofeng Yang, Suephy C. Chen

Published in: The Ultrasound Journal | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Ultrasound was first introduced in clinical dermatology in 1979. Since that time, ultrasound technology has continued to develop along with its popularity and utility.

Main text summary

Today, high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), or ultrasound using a frequency of at least 10 megahertz (MHz), allows for high-resolution imaging of the skin from the stratum corneum to the deep fascia. This non-invasive and easy-to-interpret tool allows physicians to assess skin findings in real-time, enabling enhanced diagnostic, management, and surgical capabilities. In this review, we discuss how HFUS fits into the landscape of skin imaging. We provide a brief history of its introduction to dermatology, explain key principles of ultrasonography, and review its use in characterizing normal skin, common neoplasms of the skin, dermatologic diseases and cosmetic dermatology.

Conclusion

As frequency advancements in ultrasonography continue, the broad applications of this imaging modality will continue to grow. HFUS is a fast, safe and readily available tool that can aid in diagnosing, monitoring and treating dermatologic conditions by providing more objective assessment measures.

Bhattacharya A, Young A, Wong A, Stalling S, Wei M, Hadley D (2017) Precision diagnosis of melanoma and other skin lesions from digital images. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc 2017:220–226PubMedPubMedCentral

Schneider SL, Kohli I, Hamzavi IH, Council ML, Rossi AM, Ozog DM (2019) Emerging imaging technologies in dermatology: Part I: Basic principles. J Am Acad Dermatol 80(4):1114–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.042CrossRefPubMed

Kane D, Grassi W, Sturrock R, Balint PV (2004) A brief history of musculoskeletal ultrasound: “From bats and ships to babies and hips.” Rheumatology 43(7):931–933. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh004CrossRefPubMed

Parsons SK, Chan JA, Yu WW, Obadan N, Ratichek SJ, Lee J et al. Noninvasive Diagnostic Techniques for the Detection of Skin Cancers. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Technical Briefs. Rockville (MD)2011.

Barcaui Ede O, Carvalho AC, Lopes FP, Pineiro-Maceira J, Barcaui CB (2016) High frequency ultrasound with color Doppler in dermatology. An Bras Dermatol 91(3):262–273. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164446CrossRefPubMed

Mlosek RK, Malinowska S (2013) Ultrasound image of the skin, apparatus and imaging basics. J Ultrason 13(53):212–221. https://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2013.0021CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kleinerman R, Whang TB, Bard RL, Marmur ES (2012) Ultrasound in dermatology: principles and applications. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(3):478–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2011.12.016CrossRefPubMed

Dill-Muller D, Maschke J (2007) Ultrasonography in dermatology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 5(8):689–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06453.xCrossRefPubMed

Wortsman X, Wortsman J (2010) Clinical usefulness of variable-frequency ultrasound in localized lesions of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 62(2):247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.016CrossRefPubMed

10.

Bhatta AK, Keyal U, Liu Y (2018) Application of high frequency ultrasound in dermatology. Discov Med 26(145):237–242PubMed

11.

Izzetti R, Oranges T, Janowska A, Gabriele M, Graziani F, Romanelli M (2020) The application of ultra-high-frequency ultrasound in dermatology and wound management. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 19(4):334–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734620972815CrossRefPubMed

12.

Shung KK (2009) High frequency ultrasonic imaging. J Med Ultrasound 17(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6441(09)60012-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Polanska A, Danczak-Pazdrowska A, Jalowska M, Zaba R, Adamski Z (2017) Current applications of high-frequency ultrasonography in dermatology. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 34(6):535–542. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2017.72457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Izzetti R, Vitali S, Aringhieri G, Nisi M, Oranges T, Dini V et al (2020) Ultra-high frequency ultrasound, a promising diagnostic technique: review of the literature and single-center experience. Can Assoc Radiol J. https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537120940684CrossRefPubMed

15.

Iyengar S, Makin IR, Sadhwani D, Moon E, Yanes AF, Geisler A et al (2018) Utility of a high-resolution superficial diagnostic ultrasound system for assessing skin thickness: a cross-sectional study. Dermatol Surg 44(6):855–864. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001445CrossRefPubMed

16.

Knopfel N, Gomez-Zubiaur A, Noguera-Morel L, Torrelo A, Hernandez-Martin A (2018) Ultrasound findings in idiopathic facial aseptic granuloma: case series and literature review. Pediatr Dermatol 35(3):397–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.13324CrossRefPubMed

17.

Li JW, Tong YY, Zhou J, Shi ZT, Sun PX, Chang C (2020) Tumor proliferation and invasiveness derived from ultrasound appearances of invasive breast cancers: moving beyond the routine differential diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15250CrossRefPubMed

18.

Wortsman X, Alfageme F, Roustan G, Arias-Santiago S, Martorell A, Catalano O et al (2016) Guidelines for performing dermatologic ultrasound examinations by the DERMUS Group. J Ultrasound Med 35(3):577–580. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.06046CrossRefPubMed

19.

Izzetti R, Vitali S, Oranges T, Dini V, Romanelli M, Caramella D et al (2020) Intraoral ultra-high frequency ultrasound study of oral lichen planus: a pictorial review. Skin Res Technol 26(2):200–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12777CrossRefPubMed

20.

Alexander H, Miller DL (1979) Determining skin thickness with pulsed ultra sound. J Invest Dermatol 72(1):17–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12530104CrossRefPubMed

21.

Van Mulder TJ, de Koeijer M, Theeten H, Willems D, Van Damme P, Demolder M et al (2017) High frequency ultrasound to assess skin thickness in healthy adults. Vaccine 35(14):1810–1815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.07.039CrossRefPubMed

22.

Barcaui Ede O, Carvalho AC, Pineiro-Maceira J, Barcaui CB, Moraes H (2015) Study of the skin anatomy with high-frequency (22 MHz) ultrasonography and histological correlation. Radiol Bras 48(5):324–329. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0028CrossRefPubMed

23.

Jemec GB, Gniadecka M, Ulrich J (2000) Ultrasound in dermatology. Part I. High frequency ultrasound. Eur J Dermatol. 10(6):492–497PubMed

24.

de Rigal J, Escoffier C, Querleux B, Faivre B, Agache P, Leveque JL (1989) Assessment of aging of the human skin by in vivo ultrasonic imaging. J Invest Dermatol 93(5):621–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12319741CrossRefPubMed

25.

Sandby-Moller J, Wulf HC (2004) Ultrasonographic subepidermal low-echogenic band, dependence of age and body site. Skin Res Technol 10(1):57–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00056.xCrossRefPubMed

26.

Seidenari S, Pagnoni A, Di Nardo A, Giannetti A (1994) Echographic evaluation with image analysis of normal skin: variations according to age and sex. Skin Pharmacol 7(4):201–209. https://doi.org/10.1159/000211295CrossRefPubMed

27.

Tsukahara K, Takema Y, Moriwaki S, Fujimura T, Kitahara T, Imokawa G (2000) Age-related alterations of echogenicity in Japanese skin. Dermatology 200(4):303–307. https://doi.org/10.1159/000018392CrossRefPubMed

28.

Gniadecka M (2001) Effects of ageing on dermal echogenicity. Skin Res Technol 7(3):204–207. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0846.2001.70310.xCrossRefPubMed

29.

Querleux B, Leveque JL, de Rigal J (1988) In vivo cross-sectional ultrasonic imaging of human skin. Dermatologica 177(6):332–337. https://doi.org/10.1159/000248602CrossRefPubMed

30.

Pazdrowski J, Danczak-Pazdrowska A, Polanska A, Kazmierska J, Barczak W, Szewczyk M et al (2019) An ultrasonographic monitoring of skin condition in patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. Skin Res Technol 25(6):857–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12745CrossRefPubMed

31.

El Gammal S, El Gammal C, Kaspar K, Pieck C, Altmeyer P, Vogt M et al (1999) Sonography of the skin at 100 MHz enables in vivo visualization of stratum corneum and viable epidermis in palmar skin and psoriatic plaques. J Invest Dermatol 113(5):821–829. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00795.xCrossRefPubMed

32.

Goldberg I, Sprecher E, Schwartz ME, Gaitini D (2013) Comparative study of high-resolution multifrequency ultrasound of the plantar skin in patients with various types of hereditary palmoplantar keratoderma. Dermatology 226(4):365–370. https://doi.org/10.1159/000351321CrossRefPubMed

33.

Eliason MJ, Leachman SA, Feng BJ, Schwartz ME, Hansen CD (2012) A review of the clinical phenotype of 254 patients with genetically confirmed pachyonychia congenita. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(4):680–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2011.12.009CrossRefPubMed

34.

McLean WH, Hansen CD, Eliason MJ, Smith FJ (2011) The phenotypic and molecular genetic features of pachyonychia congenita. J Invest Dermatol 131(5):1015–1017. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2011.59CrossRefPubMed

35.

Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Matsuoka L, Saavedra T, Mardones F, Saavedra D et al (2012) Sonography in pathologies of scalp and hair. Br J Radiol 85(1013):647–655. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/22636640CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Wortsman X, Carreno L, Ferreira-Wortsman C, Poniachik R, Pizarro K, Morales C et al (2019) Ultrasound characteristics of the hair follicles and tracts, sebaceous glands, montgomery glands, apocrine glands, and arrector pili muscles. J Ultrasound Med 38(8):1995–2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14888CrossRefPubMed

37.

Wortsman X (2012) Common applications of dermatologic sonography. J Ultrasound Med 31(1):97–111. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.1.97CrossRefPubMed

38.

Wortsman X, Rodriguez C, Lobos C, Eguiguren G, Molina MT (2016) Ultrasound diagnosis and staging in pediatric Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Pediatr Dermatol 33(4):e260–e264. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12895CrossRefPubMed

39.

Wortsman X, Jemec GB (2006) Ultrasound imaging of nails. Dermatol Clin 24(3):323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2006.03.014CrossRefPubMed

40.

Schneider SL, Kohli I, Hamzavi IH, Council ML, Rossi AM, Ozog DM (2019) Emerging imaging technologies in dermatology: Part II: applications and limitations. J Am Acad Dermatol 80(4):1121–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.043CrossRefPubMed

41.

Pilat P, Borzecki A, Jazienicki M, Gerkowicz A, Krasowska D (2019) High-frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of selected non-melanoma skin nodular lesions. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 36(5):572–580. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2019.89505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Bard RL (2017) High-frequency ultrasound examination in the diagnosis of skin cancer. Dermatol Clin 35(4):505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2017.06.011CrossRefPubMed

43.

Harland CC, Kale SG, Jackson P, Mortimer PS, Bamber JC (2000) Differentiation of common benign pigmented skin lesions from melanoma by high-resolution ultrasound. Br J Dermatol 143(2):281–289. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03652.xCrossRefPubMed

44.

Dinnes J, Bamber J, Chuchu N, Bayliss SE, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C et al (2018) High-frequency ultrasound for diagnosing skin cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 12:CD03188. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013188CrossRef

45.

Bobadilla JL, Love RB, Jankowska-Gan E, Xu Q, Haynes LD, Braun RK et al (2008) Th-17, monokines, collagen type V, and primary graft dysfunction in lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177(6):660–668. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200612-1901OCCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Marmur ES, Berkowitz EZ, Fuchs BS, Singer GK, Yoo JY (2010) Use of high-frequency, high-resolution ultrasound before Mohs surgery. Dermatol Surg 36(6):841–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01558.xCrossRefPubMed

47.

Malvehy J, Pellacani G (2017) Dermoscopy, confocal microscopy and other non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancers and other skin conditions. Acta Derm Venereol. 218:22–30. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2720CrossRefPubMed

48.

Mandava A, Ravuri PR, Konathan R (2013) High-resolution ultrasound imaging of cutaneous lesions. Indian J Radiol Imaging 23(3):269–277. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Uhara H, Hayashi K, Koga H, Saida T (2007) Multiple hypersonographic spots in basal cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 33(10):1215–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33256.xCrossRefPubMed

50.

Warszawik-Hendzel O, Olszewska M, Maj M, Rakowska A, Czuwara J, Rudnicka L (2015) Non-invasive diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Case Rep 9(4):89–97. https://doi.org/10.3315/jdcr.2015.1221CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Rohrbach DJ, Muffoletto D, Huihui J, Saager R, Keymel K, Paquette A et al (2014) Preoperative mapping of nonmelanoma skin cancer using spatial frequency domain and ultrasound imaging. Acad Radiol 21(2):263–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.11.013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Schmid-Wendtner MH, Dill-Muller D (2008) Ultrasound technology in dermatology. Semin Cutan Med Surg 27(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sder.2008.01.003CrossRefPubMed

53.

Polanska A, Danczak-Pazdrowska A, Olek-Hrab K, Osmola-Mankowska A, Bowszyc-Dmochowska M, Zaba R et al (2018) High-frequency ultrasonography-New non-invasive method in assessment of skin lymphomas. Skin Res Technol 24(3):517–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12450CrossRefPubMed

54.

Wang Y, Niu Z, Liu J, Zhu Q, Liu Z, Liu Y et al (2020) Value of high-frequency ultrasound in accurate staging of mycosis fungoides/Sezary Syndrome. J Ultrasound Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Polanska A, Osmola-Mankowska A, Olek-Hrab K, Molinska-Glura M, Adamski Z, Zaba R et al (2017) High-frequency ultrasonography in objective evaluation of the efficacy of PUVA and UVA 1 phototherapy in mycosis fungoides. Arch Dermatol Res 309(8):645–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-017-1767-7CrossRefPubMed

56.

Szymanska E, Nowicki A, Mlosek K, Litniewski J, Lewandowski M, Secomski W et al (2000) Skin imaging with high frequency ultrasound - preliminary results. Eur J Ultrasound 12(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-8266(00)00097-5CrossRefPubMed

57.

Botar-Jid CM, Cosgarea R, Bolboaca SD, Senila SC, Lenghel LM, Rogojan L et al (2016) Assessment of cutaneous melanoma by use of very- high-frequency ultrasound and real-time elastography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206(4):699–704. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.15182CrossRefPubMed

58.

Pilat P, Borzecki A, Jazienicki M, Krasowska D (2018) Skin melanoma imaging using ultrasonography: a literature review. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 35(3):238–242. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.76211CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Kozarova A, Kozar M, Tonhajzerova I, Pappova T, Minarikova E (2018) The value of high-frequency 20 MHz ultrasonography for preoperative measurement of cutaneous melanoma thickness. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 26(1):15–20PubMed

60.

Samimi M, Perrinaud A, Naouri M, Maruani A, Perrodeau E, Vaillant L et al (2010) High-resolution ultrasonography assists the differential diagnosis of blue naevi and cutaneous metastases of melanoma. Br J Dermatol 163(3):550–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09903.xCrossRefPubMed

61.

Akesson A, Forsberg L, Hederstrom E, Wollheim F (1986) Ultrasound examination of skin thickness in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 27(1):91–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518602700117CrossRef

62.

Bialynicki-Birula R, Reszke R, Szepietowski JC (2017) High-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS) as a useful tool in differentiating between plaque morphea and extragenital lichen sclerosus lesions. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 34(5):485–489. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2017.71118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Hesselstrand R, Carlestam J, Wildt M, Sandqvist G, Andreasson K (2015) High frequency ultrasound of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis - a follow-up study. Arthritis Res Ther 17:329. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0853-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Ranosz-Janicka I, Lis-Swiety A, Skrzypek-Salamon A, Brzezinska-Wcislo L (2019) An extended high-frequency ultrasound protocol for assessing and quantifying of inflammation and fibrosis in localized scleroderma. Skin Res Technol 25(3):359–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12660CrossRefPubMed

65.

Li H, Furst DE, Jin H, Sun C, Wang X, Yang L et al (2018) High-frequency ultrasound of the skin in systemic sclerosis: an exploratory study to examine correlation with disease activity and to define the minimally detectable difference. Arthritis Res Ther 20(1):181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1686-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Arisi M, Lorenzi L, Incardona P, Fusano M, Zanca A, Rossi MT et al (2019) Clinical, histological and high-frequency ultrasonographic evaluation (50 MHz) of morphoea treated with ultraviolet al phototherapy. Clin Exp Dermatol 44(3):270–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.13693CrossRefPubMed

67.

Acquacalda E, Albert C, Montaudie H, Fontas E, Danre A, Roux CH et al (2015) Ultrasound study of entheses in psoriasis patients with or without musculoskeletal symptoms: a prospective study. Joint Bone Spine 82(4):267–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.01.016CrossRefPubMed

68.

Aydin SZ, Castillo-Gallego C, Ash ZR, Abignano G, Marzo-Ortega H, Wittmann M et al (2013) Potential use of optical coherence tomography and high-frequency ultrasound for the assessment of nail disease in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Dermatology 227(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1159/000351702CrossRefPubMed

69.

Marina ME, Solomon C, Bolboaca SD, Bocsa C, Mihu CM, Tataru AD (2016) High-frequency sonography in the evaluation of nail psoriasis. Med Ultrason 18(3):312–317. https://doi.org/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.183.hghCrossRefPubMed

70.

Polanska A, Gaura T, Bowszyc-Dmochowska M, Osmola-Mankowska A, Olek-Hrab K, Adamski Z et al (2019) Calcipotriol/betamethasone ointment compared to narrow-band UVB in plaque psoriasis: first clinical and ultrasonographic study. Int J Dermatol 58(1):108–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.14150CrossRefPubMed

71.

Jemec GB, Heidenheim M, Nielsen NH (1996) The prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa and its potential precursor lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 35(2 Pt 1):191–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90321-7CrossRefPubMed

72.

Revuz JE, Canoui-Poitrine F, Wolkenstein P, Viallette C, Gabison G, Pouget F et al (2008) Prevalence and factors associated with hidradenitis suppurativa: results from two case-control studies. J Am Acad Dermatol 59(4):596–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.06.020CrossRefPubMed

73.

Cosmatos I, Matcho A, Weinstein R, Montgomery MO, Stang P (2013) Analysis of patient claims data to determine the prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 68(3):412–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2012.07.027CrossRefPubMed

74.

Vinkel C, Thomsen SF (2018) Hidradenitis Suppurativa: causes, features, and current treatments. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 11(10):17–23PubMedPubMedCentral

75.

Bard RL (ed) (2019) Image guided dermatologic treatments. Springer, Switzerland

76.

Lacarrubba F, Dini V, Napolitano M, Venturini M, Caposiena Caro DR, Molinelli E et al (2019) Ultrasonography in the pathway to an optimal standard of care of hidradenitis suppurativa: the Italian Ultrasound Working Group experience. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 33(Suppl 6):10–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15847CrossRefPubMed

77.

Nazzaro G, Passoni E, Muratori S, Moltrasio C, Guanziroli E, Barbareschi M et al (2018) Comparison of clinical and sonographic scores in hidradenitis suppurativa and proposal of a novel ultrasound scoring system. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-0488.18.06196-5CrossRefPubMed

78.

Wortsman X, Moreno C, Soto R, Arellano J, Pezo C, Wortsman J (2013) Ultrasound in-depth characterization and staging of hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol Surg 39(12):1835–1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12329CrossRefPubMed

79.

Loo CH, Tan WC, Tang JJ, Khor YH, Manikam MT, Low DE et al (2018) The clinical, biochemical, and ultrasonographic characteristics of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa in Northern Peninsular Malaysia: a multicenter study. Int J Dermatol 57(12):1454–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.14210CrossRefPubMed

80.

Zarchi K, Yazdanyar N, Yazdanyar S, Wortsman X, Jemec GB (2015) Pain and inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa correspond to morphological changes identified by high-frequency ultrasound. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29(3):527–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12610CrossRefPubMed

81.

Sabau M, Boca AN, Ilies RF, Tataru A (2019) Potential of high-frequency ultrasonography in the management of atopic dermatitis. Exp Ther Med 17(2):1073–1077. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6984CrossRefPubMed

82.

Grinich EE, Schmitt J, Kuster D, Spuls PI, Williams HC, Chalmers JR et al (2018) Standardized reporting of the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM): a recommendation by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Initiative. Br J Dermatol 179(2):540–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16732CrossRefPubMed

83.

Schmitt J, Spuls PI, Thomas KS, Simpson E, Furue M, Deckert S et al (2014) The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) statement to assess clinical signs of atopic eczema in trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol 134(4):800–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.043CrossRefPubMed

84.

Polanska A, Danczak-Pazdrowska A, Silny W, Wozniak A, Maksin K, Jenerowicz D et al (2013) Comparison between high-frequency ultrasonography (Dermascan C, version 3) and histopathology in atopic dermatitis. Skin Res Technol 19(4):432–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12064CrossRefPubMed

85.

Charman CR, Venn AJ, Williams HC (1999) Measurement of body surface area involvement in atopic eczema: an impossible task? Br J Dermatol 140(1):109–111. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02617.xCrossRefPubMed

86.

Polanska A, Silny W, Jenerowicz D, Kniola K, Molinska-Glura M, Danczak-Pazdrowska A (2015) Monitoring of therapy in atopic dermatitis–observations with the use of high-frequency ultrasonography. Skin Res Technol 21(1):35–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12153CrossRefPubMed

87.

Osmola-Mankowska A, Polanska A, Silny W, Zaba R, Adamski Z, Danczak-Pazdrowska A (2014) Topical tacrolimus vs medium-dose ultraviolet al phototherapy in the treatment of atopic dermatitis-a preliminary study in relation to parameters of the epidermal barrier function and high-frequency ultrasonography. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18(24):3927–3934PubMed

88.

Noe MH, Rodriguez O, Taylor L, Sultan L, Sehgal C, Schultz S et al (2017) High frequency ultrasound: a novel instrument to quantify granuloma burden in cutaneous sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 34(2):136–141PubMedPubMedCentral

89.

Chen KC, Lin AC, Chong CF, Wang TL (2016) An overview of point-of-care ultrasound for soft tissue and musculoskeletal applications in the emergency department. J Intensive Care 4:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0173-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

90.

Gong X, Yu W, Li J, Ding A, Xiong P, Lin X (2019) High-Frequency Ultrasound investigation of port-wine stains: hemodynamic features revealed by 10- and 22-MHz transducers. J Ultrasound Med 38(3):641–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14732CrossRefPubMed

91.

Alegre-Sanchez A, Bernardez C, Fonda-Pascual P, Moreno-Arrones OM, Lopez-Gutierrez JC, Jaen-Olasolo P et al (2018) Videodermoscopy and doppler-ultrasound in spider naevi: towards a new classification? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 32(1):156–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14602CrossRefPubMed

92.

Wassef M, Blei F, Adams D, Alomari A, Baselga E, Berenstein A et al (2015) Vascular anomalies classification: recommendations from the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies. Pediatrics 136(1):e203–e214. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3673CrossRefPubMed

93.

Lloret P, Redondo P, Cabrera J, Sierra A (2015) Treatment of venous leg ulcers with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy: healing, long-term recurrence and quality of life evaluation. Wound Repair Regen 23(3):369–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12288CrossRefPubMed

94.

Wortsman X, Wortsman J (2011) Sonographic outcomes of cosmetic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(5):W910–W918. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.6719CrossRefPubMed

95.

Giovagnorio F, Drudi FM, Valentini C, Paonessa A (2004) Ultrasonography in follow-up of soft tissue augmentation of the face with synthetic materials: a pilot study. Acta Radiol 45(7):746–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850410008207CrossRefPubMed

96.

Schelke LW, Van Den Elzen HJ, Erkamp PP, Neumann HA (2010) Use of ultrasound to provide overall information on facial fillers and surrounding tissue. Dermatol Surg 36(Suppl 3):1843–1851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01740.xCrossRefPubMed

97.

Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Orlandi C, Cardenas G, Sazunic I, Jemec GB (2012) Ultrasound detection and identification of cosmetic fillers in the skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 26(3):292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04047.xCrossRefPubMed

98.

Crisan D, Roman I, Crisan M, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Badea R (2015) The role of vitamin C in pushing back the boundaries of skin aging: an ultrasonographic approach. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 8:463–470. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S84903CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

99.

Addor FAS, Cotta Vieira J, Abreu Melo CS (2018) Improvement of dermal parameters in aged skin after oral use of a nutrient supplement. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 11:195–201. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S150269CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

100.

Fanian F, Mac-Mary S, Jeudy A, Lihoreau T, Messikh R, Ortonne JP et al (2013) Efficacy of micronutrient supplementation on skin aging and seasonal variation: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Clin Interv Aging 8:1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S43976CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

101.

Rodriguez Bandera AI, Moreno Bonilla G, Feito Rodriguez M, Beato Merino MJ, de Lucas LR (2019) Jellyfish-like sonographic pattern can help recognition of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Report of 3 new cases and review of the literature. Australas J Dermatol. 60(2):e148–e150. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12922CrossRefPubMed

102.

Bousquet-Rouaud R, Bazan M, Chaintreuil J, Echague A (2009) High-frequency ultrasound evaluation of cellulite treated with the 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser. J Cosmet Laser Ther 11(1):34–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14764170802612968CrossRefPubMed

103.

Lucassen GW, van der Sluys WL, van Herk JJ, Nuijs AM, Wierenga PE, Barel AO et al (1997) The effectiveness of massage treatment on cellulite as monitored by ultrasound imaging. Skin Res Technol 3(3):154–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.1997.tb00180.xCrossRefPubMed

104.

Rosenbaum M, Prieto V, Hellmer J, Boschmann M, Krueger J, Leibel RL et al (1998) An exploratory investigation of the morphology and biochemistry of cellulite. Plast Reconstr Surg 101(7):1934–1939. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199806000-00025CrossRefPubMed

Title: High-frequency ultrasound in clinical dermatology: a review
Authors: Jack Levy
Devon L. Barrett
Nile Harris
Jiwoong Jason Jeong
Xiaofeng Yang
Suephy C. Chen
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Keywords: Ultrasound
Ultrasound
Acne Inversa
Published in: The Ultrasound Journal / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2524-8987
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00222-w

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin

Prof. Florian Limbourg

Prof. Anoop Chauhan

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Pediatric Cardiology Video

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

Cardiopulmonary Comorbidity Video

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Valvular Heart Disease Video

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Watch now

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits

Illustration of figure on mountain summit/© Orapun / Stock.adobe.com, STEP AAG HeroTeaserCollection image/© Tarek / Generated with AI / Stock.adobe.com, ACC 2024 Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease: Year in Review/© 2024 American College of Cardiology, ACC 2024 Pulmonary Vascular Disease: Year in Review/© 2024 American College of Cardiology, ACC 2024 Valvular Heart Disease: Year in Review/© 2024 American College of Cardiology, ACC 2024 HF and Cardiomyopathies: Year in Review/© 2024 American College of Cardiology, Woman out walking/© Seventyfour / stock.adobe.com (symbolic image with model), Woman checking smartwatch /© saltdium / stock.adobe.com (symbolic image with model), Cardiac catheterization/© Damian / stock.adobe.com

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Main text summary

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

B-line quantification: comparing learners novice to lung ultrasound assisted by machine artificial intelligence technology to expert review

Success rate to complete optimal 20 + 2 ISUOG planes for foetal ultrasonographic structural screening during early second trimester pregnancy in Thailand

The role of ultrasound imaging in vascular compression syndromes

Are seminal vesicles a potential pitfall during pelvic exploration using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)?

Association between preoperative evaluation with lung ultrasound and outcome in frail elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery for hip fractures: study protocol for an Italian multicenter observational prospective study (LUSHIP)

One-month outcomes of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and their relationships with lung ultrasound signs

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage