Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2023

28-04-2023 | Ultrasound | Original Scientific Report

Can Short-term Follow-up with Ultrasound be Offered as an Acceptable Alternative to Immediate Biopsy or Surgery for Patients with First Ultrasound Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4A Lesions?

Authors: Ping He, Wen Chen, Li-Gang Cui, Hua Zhang

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the relevant factors associated with malignancy in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4A and to determine whether it was possible to establish a safe follow-up guideline for lower-risk 4A lesions.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients categorized as BI-RADS 4A on ultrasound who underwent ultrasound-guided biopsy or/and surgery between June 2014 and April 2020 was analyzed. Classification-tree method and cox regression analysis were used to explore the possible correlation factors of malignancy.

Results

Among 9965 patients enrolled, 1211 (mean age, 44.3 ± 13.5 years; range, 18–91 years) patients categorized as BI-RADS 4A were eligible. The result of cox regression analysis revealed the malignant rate was only associated with patient age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.038, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.029–1.048) and the mediolateral diameter of the lesion (HR = 1.261, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.159–1.372). The malignant rate for patients (≤ 36 y) with BI-RADS 4A lesions (the mediolateral diameter ≤ 0.9 cm) was 0.0% (0/72). This subgroup included fibrocystic disease and adenosis in 39 patients (54.2%), fibroadenoma in 16 (22.2%), intraductal papilloma in 8 (11.1%), inflammatory lesions in 6 (8.3%), cyst in 2 (2.8%), and hamartoma in 1 (1.4%).

Conclusions

Patient age and lesion size are associated with the rate of malignancy in BI-RADS 4A. For patients with lower-risk BI-RADS 4A lesions (≤ 2% likelihood of malignancy), short-term follow-up with ultrasound may be offered as an acceptable alternative to immediate biopsy or surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference He P, Cui LG, Chen W, Yang RL (2019) Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: assessment of diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing breast lesions and influence of clinical factors on positive predictive value. Ultrasound Med Biol 45:1253–1258CrossRefPubMed He P, Cui LG, Chen W, Yang RL (2019) Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: assessment of diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing breast lesions and influence of clinical factors on positive predictive value. Ultrasound Med Biol 45:1253–1258CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS (2006) BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 239:385–391CrossRefPubMed Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS (2006) BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 239:385–391CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Spak DA, Plaxco JS, Santiago L, Dryden MJ, Dogan BE (2017) BI-RADS((R)) fifth edition: a summary of changes, Diagn Interv. Imaging 98:179–190 Spak DA, Plaxco JS, Santiago L, Dryden MJ, Dogan BE (2017) BI-RADS((R)) fifth edition: a summary of changes, Diagn Interv. Imaging 98:179–190
4.
go back to reference Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C, Ojeda-Fournier H (2016) A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS fifth edition. Radiographics 36:623–639CrossRefPubMed Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C, Ojeda-Fournier H (2016) A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS fifth edition. Radiographics 36:623–639CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Stavros AT, Freitas AG, deMello GGN, Barke L, McDonald D, Kaske T, Wolverton D, Honick A, Stanzani D, Padovan AH, Moura APC, de Campos MCV (2017) Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3–5 for solid masses: an independent reader study. Eur Radiol 27:4307–4315CrossRefPubMed Stavros AT, Freitas AG, deMello GGN, Barke L, McDonald D, Kaske T, Wolverton D, Honick A, Stanzani D, Padovan AH, Moura APC, de Campos MCV (2017) Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3–5 for solid masses: an independent reader study. Eur Radiol 27:4307–4315CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hu Y, Yang Y, Gu R, Jin L, Shen S, Liu F, Wang H, Mei J, Jiang X, Liu Q, Su F (2018) Does patient age affect the PPV3 of ACR BI-RADS ultrasound categories 4 and 5 in the diagnostic setting? Eur Radiol 28:2492–2498CrossRefPubMed Hu Y, Yang Y, Gu R, Jin L, Shen S, Liu F, Wang H, Mei J, Jiang X, Liu Q, Su F (2018) Does patient age affect the PPV3 of ACR BI-RADS ultrasound categories 4 and 5 in the diagnostic setting? Eur Radiol 28:2492–2498CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chaiwerawattana A, Thanasitthichai S, Boonlikit S, Apiwanich C, Worawattanakul S, Intakawin A, Rakiad S, Thongkham K (2012) Clinical outcome of breast cancer BI-RADS 4 lesions during 2003–2008 in the national cancer institute Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13:4063–4066CrossRefPubMed Chaiwerawattana A, Thanasitthichai S, Boonlikit S, Apiwanich C, Worawattanakul S, Intakawin A, Rakiad S, Thongkham K (2012) Clinical outcome of breast cancer BI-RADS 4 lesions during 2003–2008 in the national cancer institute Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13:4063–4066CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fu CY, Hsu HH, Yu JC, Hsu GC, Hsu KF, Chan DC, Ku CH, Lu TC, Chu CH (2011) Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5. Ultraschall Med 32(Suppl 1):S8-13PubMed Fu CY, Hsu HH, Yu JC, Hsu GC, Hsu KF, Chan DC, Ku CH, Lu TC, Chu CH (2011) Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5. Ultraschall Med 32(Suppl 1):S8-13PubMed
9.
go back to reference Zou X, Wang J, Lan X, Lin Q, Han F, Liu L, Li A (2016) Assessment of diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of categories 4 and 5 of the second edition of the BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon in diagnosing breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 42:2065–2071CrossRefPubMed Zou X, Wang J, Lan X, Lin Q, Han F, Liu L, Li A (2016) Assessment of diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of categories 4 and 5 of the second edition of the BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon in diagnosing breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 42:2065–2071CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Flowers CI, O’Donoghue C, Moore D, Goss A, Kim D, Kim JH, Elias SG, Fridland J, Esserman LJ (2013) Reducing false-positive biopsies: a pilot study to reduce benign biopsy rates for BI-RADS 4A/B assessments through testing risk stratification and new thresholds for intervention. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139:769–777CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Flowers CI, O’Donoghue C, Moore D, Goss A, Kim D, Kim JH, Elias SG, Fridland J, Esserman LJ (2013) Reducing false-positive biopsies: a pilot study to reduce benign biopsy rates for BI-RADS 4A/B assessments through testing risk stratification and new thresholds for intervention. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139:769–777CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Yoon JH, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK (2011) Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:693–699CrossRefPubMed Yoon JH, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK (2011) Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:693–699CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Spinelli Varella MA, Teixeira da Cruz J, Rauber A, Varella IS, Fleck JF, Moreira LF (2018) Role of BI-RADS ultrasound subcategories 4A to 4C in predicting breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 18:e507–e511CrossRefPubMed Spinelli Varella MA, Teixeira da Cruz J, Rauber A, Varella IS, Fleck JF, Moreira LF (2018) Role of BI-RADS ultrasound subcategories 4A to 4C in predicting breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 18:e507–e511CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Liu G, Zhang MK, He Y, Liu Y, Li XR, Wang ZL (2019) BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: could multi-mode ultrasound be helpful for their diagnosis? Gland Surg 8:258–270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu G, Zhang MK, He Y, Liu Y, Li XR, Wang ZL (2019) BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: could multi-mode ultrasound be helpful for their diagnosis? Gland Surg 8:258–270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Stavros AT (2003) Breast ultrasound. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Stavros AT (2003) Breast ultrasound. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
15.
go back to reference Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, St Louis J, Finkelstein DM, Yu KD, Chen WQ, Shao ZM, Goss PE (2014) Breast cancer in China. Lancet Oncol 15:e279-289CrossRefPubMed Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, St Louis J, Finkelstein DM, Yu KD, Chen WQ, Shao ZM, Goss PE (2014) Breast cancer in China. Lancet Oncol 15:e279-289CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Can Short-term Follow-up with Ultrasound be Offered as an Acceptable Alternative to Immediate Biopsy or Surgery for Patients with First Ultrasound Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4A Lesions?
Authors
Ping He
Wen Chen
Li-Gang Cui
Hua Zhang
Publication date
28-04-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2023
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07037-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2023

World Journal of Surgery 9/2023 Go to the issue