Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019

01-10-2019 | Ultrasound | Preclinical study

Breast pain and cancer: should we continue to work-up isolated breast pain?

Authors: Marina Mohallem Fonseca, Leslie R. Lamb, Raman Verma, Olaitan Ogunkinle, Jean M. Seely

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the cancer detection rate (CDR) in patients presenting with isolated breast pain.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients presenting to a large tertiary care academic center or an affiliated hospital with isolated breast pain from October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, pain characteristics, imaging findings, and outcome.

Results

The study cohort was comprised of 971 exams in 953 patients, with a median age of 50 years. A total of 62.5% (607/971) of the cases were assessed by mammography and ultrasound, 24.4% (237/971) by ultrasound only, and 13.1% (127/971) by mammography only. Including the abnormalities detected in the asymptomatic breast, 88.7% (861/971) of the cases were negative or had benign findings (BI-RADS 1 and 2), 6.8% (66/971) were probably benign (BI-RADS 3), 3.9% (38/971) were suspicious (BI-RADS 4), and 0.6% (6/971) were highly suggestive of malignancy (BI-RADS 5). CDR on initial work-up was 0.8% (8/953), of which 0.6% (4/690) was in average-risk patients while 1.5% (4/263) was in higher-than-average risk patients.

Conclusions

CDR in patients presenting with isolated breast pain overall was low, comparable to the expected incidence of breast cancer in asymptomatic women. Work-up for isolated breast pain may therefore be unnecessary and lead to overutilization of healthcare resources. Routine screening mammography should be encouraged and higher-than-average risk patients may benefit from additional tests.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ader DN, Browne MW (1997) Prevalence and impact of cyclic mastalgia in a United States clinic-based sample. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:126–132CrossRefPubMed Ader DN, Browne MW (1997) Prevalence and impact of cyclic mastalgia in a United States clinic-based sample. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:126–132CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ader DN, Shriver CD (1997) Cyclical mastalgia: prevalence and impact in an outpatient breast clinic sample. J Am Coll Surg 185:466–470CrossRefPubMed Ader DN, Shriver CD (1997) Cyclical mastalgia: prevalence and impact in an outpatient breast clinic sample. J Am Coll Surg 185:466–470CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kataria K, Dhar A, Srivastava A, Kumar S, Goyal A (2014) A systematic review of current understanding and management of mastalgia. Indian J Surg 76:217–222CrossRefPubMed Kataria K, Dhar A, Srivastava A, Kumar S, Goyal A (2014) A systematic review of current understanding and management of mastalgia. Indian J Surg 76:217–222CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Leinster SJ, Whitehouse GH, Walsh PV (1987) Cyclical mastalgia: clinical and mammographic observations in a screened population. Br J Surg 74:220–222CrossRefPubMed Leinster SJ, Whitehouse GH, Walsh PV (1987) Cyclical mastalgia: clinical and mammographic observations in a screened population. Br J Surg 74:220–222CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Scurr J, Hedger W, Morris P, Brown N (2014) The prevalence, severity, and impact of breast pain in the general population. Breast J 20:508–513CrossRefPubMed Scurr J, Hedger W, Morris P, Brown N (2014) The prevalence, severity, and impact of breast pain in the general population. Breast J 20:508–513CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kushwaha AC, Shin K, Kalambo M, Legha R, Gerlach KE, Kapoor MM, Yang WT (2018) Overutilization of health care resources for breast pain. Am J Roentgenol 211:217–223CrossRef Kushwaha AC, Shin K, Kalambo M, Legha R, Gerlach KE, Kapoor MM, Yang WT (2018) Overutilization of health care resources for breast pain. Am J Roentgenol 211:217–223CrossRef
7.
9.
go back to reference Barton MB, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW (1999) Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med 130:651–657CrossRefPubMed Barton MB, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW (1999) Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med 130:651–657CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chetlen AL, Kapoor MM, Watts MR (2017) Mastalgia: imaging work-up appropriateness. Acad Radiol 24:345–349CrossRefPubMed Chetlen AL, Kapoor MM, Watts MR (2017) Mastalgia: imaging work-up appropriateness. Acad Radiol 24:345–349CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fariselli G, Lepera P, Viganotti G, Martelli G, Bandieramonte G, Di Pietro S (1988) Localized mastalgia as presenting symptom in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 14:213–215PubMed Fariselli G, Lepera P, Viganotti G, Martelli G, Bandieramonte G, Di Pietro S (1988) Localized mastalgia as presenting symptom in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 14:213–215PubMed
12.
go back to reference Leddy R, Irshad A, Zerwas E et al (2013) Role of breast ultrasound and mammography in evaluating patients presenting with focal breast pain in the absence of a palpable lump. Breast J 19:582–589CrossRefPubMed Leddy R, Irshad A, Zerwas E et al (2013) Role of breast ultrasound and mammography in evaluating patients presenting with focal breast pain in the absence of a palpable lump. Breast J 19:582–589CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Leung JW, Kornguth PJ, Gotway MB (2002) Utility of targeted sonography in the evaluation of focal breast pain. J Ultrasound Med 21:521–526 (quiz 28–29)CrossRefPubMed Leung JW, Kornguth PJ, Gotway MB (2002) Utility of targeted sonography in the evaluation of focal breast pain. J Ultrasound Med 21:521–526 (quiz 28–29)CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Locker AP, Manhire AR, Stickland V, Caseldine J, Blamey RW (1989) Mammography in symptomatic breast disease. Lancet 1:887–889CrossRefPubMed Locker AP, Manhire AR, Stickland V, Caseldine J, Blamey RW (1989) Mammography in symptomatic breast disease. Lancet 1:887–889CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lumachi F, Ermani M, Brandes AA et al (2002) Breast complaints and risk of breast cancer. Population-based study of 2,879 self-selected women and long-term follow-up. Biomed Pharmacother 56(2):88–92CrossRefPubMed Lumachi F, Ermani M, Brandes AA et al (2002) Breast complaints and risk of breast cancer. Population-based study of 2,879 self-selected women and long-term follow-up. Biomed Pharmacother 56(2):88–92CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA (2004) Evaluation and management of breast pain. Mayo Clin Proc 79(3):353–372CrossRefPubMed Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA (2004) Evaluation and management of breast pain. Mayo Clin Proc 79(3):353–372CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Duijm LEM, Guit GL, Hendriks JHCL, Zaat JOM, Mali WPTM (1998) Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts: observational follow up study. Br Med J317(7171):1492–1495CrossRef Duijm LEM, Guit GL, Hendriks JHCL, Zaat JOM, Mali WPTM (1998) Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts: observational follow up study. Br Med J317(7171):1492–1495CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Masroor I, Afzal S, Sakhawat S, Khan N, Beg MA, Kawai D (2009) Negative predictive value of mammography and sonography in mastalgia with negative physical findings. J Pak Med Assoc 59:598–601PubMed Masroor I, Afzal S, Sakhawat S, Khan N, Beg MA, Kawai D (2009) Negative predictive value of mammography and sonography in mastalgia with negative physical findings. J Pak Med Assoc 59:598–601PubMed
19.
go back to reference Cho MW, Grimm LJ, Johnson KS (2017) Focal breast pain: does breast density affect the need for ultrasound? Acad Radiol 24:53–59CrossRefPubMed Cho MW, Grimm LJ, Johnson KS (2017) Focal breast pain: does breast density affect the need for ultrasound? Acad Radiol 24:53–59CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Noroozian M, Stein LF, Gaetke-Udager K, Helvie MA (2015) Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated. Breast Cancer Res Treat 149:417–424CrossRefPubMed Noroozian M, Stein LF, Gaetke-Udager K, Helvie MA (2015) Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated. Breast Cancer Res Treat 149:417–424CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jokich PM, Bailey L, D’Orsi C, Green ED, Holbrook AI, Lee SJ, Lourenco AP, Mainiero MB, Moy L, Sepulveda KA, Slanetz PJ, Trikha S, Yepes MM, Newell MS (2017) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® breast pain. J Am Coll Radiol 14:S25–S33CrossRefPubMed Jokich PM, Bailey L, D’Orsi C, Green ED, Holbrook AI, Lee SJ, Lourenco AP, Mainiero MB, Moy L, Sepulveda KA, Slanetz PJ, Trikha S, Yepes MM, Newell MS (2017) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® breast pain. J Am Coll Radiol 14:S25–S33CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (eds) ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system, 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (eds) ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system, 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
24.
go back to reference Dee KE, Sickles EA (2001) Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently. Am J Roentgenol 176(3):729–733CrossRef Dee KE, Sickles EA (2001) Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently. Am J Roentgenol 176(3):729–733CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R et al (2005) Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 235(3):775–790CrossRefPubMed Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R et al (2005) Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 235(3):775–790CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sickles E, Wolverton D, Dee K (2002) Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 224:861–869CrossRefPubMed Sickles E, Wolverton D, Dee K (2002) Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 224:861–869CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Berg W, Zhang Z, Lehrer et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307(13):1394–1404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berg W, Zhang Z, Lehrer et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307(13):1394–1404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Leung JW, Margolin FR, Dee KE, Jacobs RP, Denny SR, Schrumpf JD (2007) Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: are there differences between specialists and general radiologists? AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(1):236–241CrossRefPubMed Leung JW, Margolin FR, Dee KE, Jacobs RP, Denny SR, Schrumpf JD (2007) Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: are there differences between specialists and general radiologists? AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(1):236–241CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Tumyan L, Hoyt AC, Bassett LW (2005) Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Breast J 11:333–337CrossRefPubMed Tumyan L, Hoyt AC, Bassett LW (2005) Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Breast J 11:333–337CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Breast pain and cancer: should we continue to work-up isolated breast pain?
Authors
Marina Mohallem Fonseca
Leslie R. Lamb
Raman Verma
Olaitan Ogunkinle
Jean M. Seely
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05354-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine