Skip to main content
Top

24-04-2023 | Type 2 Diabetes | News

Sulfonylureas ‘unlikely’ to increase CV, mortality risk in real-world use

Author: Alba Ruzafa

print
PRINT
insite
SEARCH

medwireNews: Findings from a Scottish national cohort study show that the use of sulfonylureas (SUs) as second-line glucose-lowering therapy is not associated with elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk or all-cause mortality.

For the study, Ewan Pearson (University of Dundee, UK) and co-authors included data for 29,518 adults with type 2 diabetes diagnosed before the end of 2017, who did not reach a glycated hemoglobin level of 48 mmol/mol (6.5 %) or lower despite receiving metformin monotherapy and were started on SUs (62.8%) or non-SUs (37.2%) as second-line therapy in 2010 or later.

During a median follow-up of 3.9 and 3.0 years in the SU and non-SU groups, respectively, the unadjusted incidence rates of major adverse CV events (MACE), defined as hospitalization for myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or heart failure, and CV death, were higher in the SU than non-SU group, at 23.4 versus 18.7 per 1000 person–years. Similar results were observed for the individual MACE endpoints.

However, when the researchers calculated the relative effect of SUs versus non-SUs in analyses accounting for confounding variables including prescribing preferences, they obtained adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 0.96 to 1.03. They note that the upper limits of the 95% confidence intervals, which were all below 1.3, met the criteria for noninferiority of SUs versus non-SUs.

Writing in Diabetes Care they say that “SUs prescribed as second-line pharmacotherapy are unlikely to increase CV risk.”

The team also looked at subgroup analyses comparing SUs versus dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors (n=9114) and versus thiazolidinediones (TZD; n=1873). The results of the multivariable analysis showed no significantly higher risks in the SU group compared with DPP-4 inhibitors and TZD. And they add that “[t]he CV safety of SU was consistently supported across all predefined subgroups.”

Pearson et al conclude: “Given their potent efficacy, microvascular benefits, cost effectiveness, and widespread use, this study supports that SU should remain a part of the global diabetes treatment portfolio.”

Diabetes Care 2023; doi: 10.2337/dc22-1238

print
PRINT

Related topics

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.