Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Type 2 Diabetes | Original Research

Mobile-Enhanced Peer Support for African Americans with Type 2 Diabetes: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Caroline Presley, MD, MPH, April Agne, MPH, Tanya Shelton, RN, MSN, CDE, Robert Oster, PhD, Andrea Cherrington, MD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Peer support has been shown to improve diabetes self-management and control, but no standard exists to link peer support interventions to clinical care.

Objective

To compare a community-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) plus mobile health (mHealth)–enhanced peer support intervention to community-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) alone for African American adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Design

A randomized controlled trial.

Participants

African American adults, age > 19 years, receiving care within a safety-net healthcare system in Jefferson County, Alabama, with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and a hemoglobin A1c (A1C) ≥ 7.5%.

Interventions

Participants in the intervention group received community-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) plus 6 months of mHealth-enhanced peer support, including 12 weekly phone calls, then 3 monthly calls from community health workers, who used a novel web application to communicate with participants’ healthcare teams. In the control group, participants received community-based DSME alone.

Main Measures

The primary outcome was A1C; secondary outcomes included diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy or confidence in their ability to manage diabetes, and social support. We used mixed models repeated measures analyses to assess for between-arm differences and baseline to follow-up changes.

Key Results

Of 120 participants randomized, 97 completed the study. Participants in intervention and control groups experienced clinically meaningful reduction in A1C, 10.1 (SD 1.7) to 9.6 (SD 1.9) and 9.8 (SD 1.7) to 9.1 (SD 1.9) respectively, p = 0.004. Participants in the intervention group experienced a significantly larger reduction in diabetes distress compared to the control, 2.7 (SD 1.2) to 2.1 (1.0) versus 2.6 (SD 1.1) to 2.3 (SD 1.0) p = 0.041.

Conclusions

Community-based DSME with and without peer support led to improved glycemic control. Peer support linked to clinical care led to a larger reduction in diabetes distress, which has important implications for the overall wellbeing of adults with type 2 diabetes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Safford MM, Russell L, Suh D, Roman S, Pogach L. How Much Time Do Patients with Diabetes Spend on Self-Care ? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18(4):262-270.CrossRef Safford MM, Russell L, Suh D, Roman S, Pogach L. How Much Time Do Patients with Diabetes Spend on Self-Care ? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18(4):262-270.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017. Atlanta, GA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services; 2017. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017. Atlanta, GA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services; 2017.
5.
go back to reference Spanakis EK, Golden SH. Race/Ethnic Difference in Diabetes and Diabetic Complications. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(6). 10.1007/s11892-013-0421-9 Spanakis EK, Golden SH. Race/Ethnic Difference in Diabetes and Diabetic Complications. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(6). 10.1007/s11892-013-0421-9
6.
go back to reference Young BA, Maynard C, Boyko EJ. Racial Differences in Diabetic Nephropathy, Cardiovascular Disease, and Mortality in a National Population of Veterans. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(8):2392-2399.CrossRef Young BA, Maynard C, Boyko EJ. Racial Differences in Diabetic Nephropathy, Cardiovascular Disease, and Mortality in a National Population of Veterans. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(8):2392-2399.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Robbins JM, Vaccarino V, Zhang H, Kasl S V. Socioeconomic status and type 2 diabetes in African American and non-Hispanic white women and men: evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(1):76-83.CrossRef Robbins JM, Vaccarino V, Zhang H, Kasl S V. Socioeconomic status and type 2 diabetes in African American and non-Hispanic white women and men: evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(1):76-83.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Perrin NE, Davies MJ, Robertson N, Snoek FJ, Khunti K. The prevalence of diabetes-specific emotional distress in people with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2017;34(11). 10.1111/dme.13448 Perrin NE, Davies MJ, Robertson N, Snoek FJ, Khunti K. The prevalence of diabetes-specific emotional distress in people with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2017;34(11). 10.1111/dme.13448
15.
go back to reference Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, et al. Assessing Psychosocial Distress in Diabetes: Development of the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(3):626-631.CrossRef Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, et al. Assessing Psychosocial Distress in Diabetes: Development of the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(3):626-631.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference What is Peer Support? Peers for Progress. http://peersforprogress.org/learn-about-peer-support/what-is-peer-support/. Accessed June 27, 2019. What is Peer Support? Peers for Progress. http://​peersforprogress​.​org/​learn-about-peer-support/​what-is-peer-support/​.​ Accessed June 27, 2019.
32.
go back to reference Norman D. User-Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. In: The Psychology of Everyday Things. ; 1988. Norman D. User-Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. In: The Psychology of Everyday Things. ; 1988.
47.
go back to reference Hackett RA, Steptoe A. Psychosocial Factors in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18(10). 10.1007/s11886-016-0771-4 Hackett RA, Steptoe A. Psychosocial Factors in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18(10). 10.1007/s11886-016-0771-4
Metadata
Title
Mobile-Enhanced Peer Support for African Americans with Type 2 Diabetes: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
Caroline Presley, MD, MPH
April Agne, MPH
Tanya Shelton, RN, MSN, CDE
Robert Oster, PhD
Andrea Cherrington, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Type 2 Diabetes
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06011-w

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2020 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.