Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Tuberculosis | Study protocol

Bridging the knowledge-practice gap in tuberculosis contact management in a high-burden setting: a mixed-methods protocol for a multicenter health system strengthening study

Authors: Trisasi Lestari, Steve Graham, Christel van den Boogard, Rina Triasih, Jeanne Rini Poespoprodjo, Reynold Rizal Ubra, Enny Kenangalem, Yodi Mahendradhata, Nicholas M. Anstey, Ross S. Bailie, Anna P. Ralph

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

People in close contact with tuberculosis should have screening and appropriate management, as an opportunity for active case detection and prevention. However, implementation of tuberculosis contact screening and management is limited in high-burden settings. Behaviour change is needed across three levels of the healthcare system—policymakers, healthcare providers, and patients. To bridge the wide policy-practice gap, this study draws on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, the Behaviour Change Wheel, and the RE-AIM model (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) to respectively understand barriers, implement change, and evaluate process and outcome.

Methods

This methods paper describes a mixed-methods intervention study in Eastern Indonesia. Quantitative data will be collected during baseline, intervention, and sustainability periods and analyzed using time series analysis. The primary outcome is the number of individuals completing tuberculosis preventive therapy by the end of the two-year intervention phase. Of an estimated 10,000 contacts during this period, we anticipate that a minimum of 416 will be found to have active TB or will complete preventive therapy. Qualitative data (semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and observations) will be collected from consenting healthcare providers, patients, and contacts. Activities to promote policy implementation include healthcare provider training, quarterly continuous quality improvement workshops, a social media discussion forum, and promotional materials. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research will be used to identify reasons for limited policy implementation at baseline. The Behaviour Change Wheel will be used to ensure that a suitable range of activities are implemented to facilitate change. The RE-AIM model will be used as the evaluation framework.

Discussion

Use of theoretical frameworks in combination can ensure a comprehensive understanding of, and robust response to, health policy underimplementation. The selected frameworks are highly applicable to this pragmatic intervention study, in a setting where End TB Strategy targets will not be met without substantial behavior change within health systems. Continuous quality improvement cycles will provide a way to engage staff and stakeholders in understanding local data to motivate behavior change. If successful, up to 500 people could be prevented from developing complications of tuberculosis through early case-finding or receiving preventive therapy over a two-year period.

Study registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register 375803.
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO. Global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care and control after 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. WHO. Global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care and control after 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
2.
go back to reference WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
3.
go back to reference WHO. Implementing the End TB Strategy: The essentials. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. WHO. Implementing the End TB Strategy: The essentials. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
5.
go back to reference WHO. Latent tuberculosis infection: updated and consolidated guidelines for programmatic management. Geneva: WHO Press; 2018. WHO. Latent tuberculosis infection: updated and consolidated guidelines for programmatic management. Geneva: WHO Press; 2018.
8.
go back to reference MOH. Technical guidance: Child Tuberculosis Control and Management. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia; 2016. MOH. Technical guidance: Child Tuberculosis Control and Management. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia; 2016.
17.
go back to reference MOH. Sinergisme pusat dan daerah dalam mewujudkan universal health coverage (UHC) melalui percepatan eliminasi tuberkulosis. Jakarta: Ministry of Health; 2018. MOH. Sinergisme pusat dan daerah dalam mewujudkan universal health coverage (UHC) melalui percepatan eliminasi tuberkulosis. Jakarta: Ministry of Health; 2018.
22.
go back to reference Stop TB Partnership. The paradigm shift: 2016-2020. UNOPS, 2015. Stop TB Partnership. The paradigm shift: 2016-2020. UNOPS, 2015.
23.
go back to reference WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
26.
go back to reference Probandari A, Widjanarko B, Mahendradhata Y, Sanjoto H, Cerisha A, Nungky S, et al. The path to impact of operational research on tuberculosis control policies and practices in Indonesia. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:29866. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.29866. Epub 2016/03/02. PubMed PMID: 26928217; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4770863.CrossRefPubMed Probandari A, Widjanarko B, Mahendradhata Y, Sanjoto H, Cerisha A, Nungky S, et al. The path to impact of operational research on tuberculosis control policies and practices in Indonesia. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:29866. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3402/​gha.​v9.​29866. Epub 2016/03/02. PubMed PMID: 26928217; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4770863.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7. Epub 1999/09/04. PubMed PMID: 10474547; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1508772.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7. Epub 1999/09/04. PubMed PMID: 10474547; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1508772.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference BPS. Mimika Regency in Figures 2017. Mimika: BPS-Statistics of Mimika Regency; 2017. BPS. Mimika Regency in Figures 2017. Mimika: BPS-Statistics of Mimika Regency; 2017.
37.
go back to reference Poespoprodjo JR, Fobia W, Kenangalem E, Lampah DA, Warikar N, Seal A, et al. Adverse pregnancy outcomes in an area where multidrug-resistant plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum infections are endemic. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(9):1374–81 PubMed PMID: 18419439.CrossRefPubMed Poespoprodjo JR, Fobia W, Kenangalem E, Lampah DA, Warikar N, Seal A, et al. Adverse pregnancy outcomes in an area where multidrug-resistant plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum infections are endemic. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(9):1374–81 PubMed PMID: 18419439.CrossRefPubMed
38.
41.
go back to reference WHO. Recommendations for investigating contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: WHO Press; 2012. p. 70. WHO. Recommendations for investigating contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: WHO Press; 2012. p. 70.
45.
go back to reference Flick U. Qualitative data analysis Metzler K, editor. Great Britain: The Dorset Press; 2014. Flick U. Qualitative data analysis Metzler K, editor. Great Britain: The Dorset Press; 2014.
47.
go back to reference Stamatakis KA, Vinson CA, Kerner JF. Dissemination and implementation research in community and public health settings. 1st ed. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 2012. Stamatakis KA, Vinson CA, Kerner JF. Dissemination and implementation research in community and public health settings. 1st ed. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 2012.
48.
go back to reference Ralph AP, de Dassel JL, Kirby A, Read C, Mitchell AG, Maguire GP, et al. Improving Delivery of Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in a High-Burden Setting: Outcome of a Stepped-Wedge, Community, Randomized Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(14). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009308. Epub 2018/07/19. PubMed PMID: 30018165; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6064833. Ralph AP, de Dassel JL, Kirby A, Read C, Mitchell AG, Maguire GP, et al. Improving Delivery of Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in a High-Burden Setting: Outcome of a Stepped-Wedge, Community, Randomized Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(14). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1161/​JAHA.​118.​009308. Epub 2018/07/19. PubMed PMID: 30018165; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6064833.
Metadata
Title
Bridging the knowledge-practice gap in tuberculosis contact management in a high-burden setting: a mixed-methods protocol for a multicenter health system strengthening study
Authors
Trisasi Lestari
Steve Graham
Christel van den Boogard
Rina Triasih
Jeanne Rini Poespoprodjo
Reynold Rizal Ubra
Enny Kenangalem
Yodi Mahendradhata
Nicholas M. Anstey
Ross S. Bailie
Anna P. Ralph
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0870-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Implementation Science 1/2019 Go to the issue