Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Triage | Research

Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors

Authors: B. Porro, S. J. Tamminga, A. G.E.M. de Boer, A. Petit, Y. Roquelaure, M. A. Greidanus

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Managers are considered to be main stakeholders in the return to work (RTW) of cancer survivors. However, the perspectives of cancer survivors and managers differ on what managerial actions should be taken during the RTW of cancer survivors. This difference might put effective collaboration and successful RTW at risk. Therefore, this study aims to reach consensus among managers and cancer survivors on the managerial actions to be taken during the four different RTW phases of cancer survivors (i.e., Disclosure, Treatment, RTW plan, Actual RTW).

Methods

The Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts (TRIAGE) was implemented with managers and cancer survivors (hereafter referred to as “experts”). An initial list of 24 actions was derived from a previous study. Firstly, for each action, fifteen experts were asked to indicate individually how important this action is per RTW phase (Likert scale from 1 – “Not important at all” to 6 – “Very important”). Consensus was reached when ≥ 80% (i.e., ≥ twelve experts) of the experts rated that action ≥5. Secondly, for each phase of the RTW process, the 15 actions with the highest percentage were discussed with eight experts during the collective consultation, except for the actions that already reached consensus. After discussion, the experts voted whether each action was important (“yes” / “no”) and consensus required ≥ 87.5% (i.e., ≥ seven experts) of the experts to consider an action as important.

Results

Twenty-five managerial actions were finally retained for at least one of the RTW phases, e.g., Disclosure: “respect privacy” and “radiate a positive attitude”, Treatment: “show appreciation” and “allow sufficient sick leave”, RTW Plan: “tailor” and “communicate”, and Actual RTW: “support practically” and “balance interest”.

Conclusion

Cancer survivors and managers reached consensus on the importance of 25 managerial actions, distributed into each phase of the RTW process. These actions should be considered an interplay of managerial actions by different stakeholders on the part of the employer (e.g., direct supervisor, HR-manager), and should be a responsibility that is shared by these stakeholders. The collective implementation of these actions within the company will help cancer survivors feel fully supported.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference de Boer A, Frings-Dresen M, Feuerstein M. Improving Return to Work in Cancer Survivors. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of Return to Work: From Research to Practice. Boston: Springer US; 2016. pp. 481–503.CrossRef de Boer A, Frings-Dresen M, Feuerstein M. Improving Return to Work in Cancer Survivors. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of Return to Work: From Research to Practice. Boston: Springer US; 2016. pp. 481–503.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wells M, Williams B, Firnigl D, et al. Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies: Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on return to work after cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22:1208–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3148.CrossRefPubMed Wells M, Williams B, Firnigl D, et al. Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies: Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on return to work after cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22:1208–19. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pon.​3148.CrossRefPubMed
13.
24.
go back to reference INCa. Déclaration politique et liste des actions contre le cancer, recommandées par un panel de parties prenantes européennes. Paris: Institut National du Cancer; 2022. INCa. Déclaration politique et liste des actions contre le cancer, recommandées par un panel de parties prenantes européennes. Paris: Institut National du Cancer; 2022.
26.
go back to reference Albert D, Pépin. TRIAGE – une technique structurée sollicitant l’opinion d’experts en vue d’atteindre un consensus: un exemple d’utilisation dans une recherche visant l’adaptation d’un questionnaire autoadministré pour une clientèle en incapacité prolongé au travail. In: Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la santé. Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2014. p. 722. Albert D, Pépin. TRIAGE – une technique structurée sollicitant l’opinion d’experts en vue d’atteindre un consensus: un exemple d’utilisation dans une recherche visant l’adaptation d’un questionnaire autoadministré pour une clientèle en incapacité prolongé au travail. In: Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la santé. Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2014. p. 722.
30.
go back to reference Pomey M-P, Flora L, Karazivan P, et al. The Montreal model: the challenges of a partnership relationship between patients and healthcare professionals. Sante Publique (Bucur). 2015;1:41–50. Pomey M-P, Flora L, Karazivan P, et al. The Montreal model: the challenges of a partnership relationship between patients and healthcare professionals. Sante Publique (Bucur). 2015;1:41–50.
34.
go back to reference Nilsson MI, Petersson L-M, Wennman-Larsen A, et al. Adjustment and social support at work early after breast cancer surgery and its associations with sickness absence: Work adjustment and social support after breast cancer surgery. Psychooncology. 2013;22:2755–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3341.CrossRefPubMed Nilsson MI, Petersson L-M, Wennman-Larsen A, et al. Adjustment and social support at work early after breast cancer surgery and its associations with sickness absence: Work adjustment and social support after breast cancer surgery. Psychooncology. 2013;22:2755–62. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pon.​3341.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Fassier J-B. Work Disability Prevention in France: Organizational and Political Challenges. In: The Science and Politics of Work Disability Prevention. Routledge; 2018. Fassier J-B. Work Disability Prevention in France: Organizational and Political Challenges. In: The Science and Politics of Work Disability Prevention. Routledge; 2018.
40.
go back to reference de Rijk A de. Work Disability Prevention in the Netherlands: A Key Role for Employers. In: The Science and Politics of Work Disability Prevention. Routledge; 2018. de Rijk A de. Work Disability Prevention in the Netherlands: A Key Role for Employers. In: The Science and Politics of Work Disability Prevention. Routledge; 2018.
46.
go back to reference Wilson S, Hicks B, Stevens H. Scoping the development of work and cancer support for SMEs. UK: Institute for Employment Studies; 2012. Wilson S, Hicks B, Stevens H. Scoping the development of work and cancer support for SMEs. UK: Institute for Employment Studies; 2012.
Metadata
Title
Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors
Authors
B. Porro
S. J. Tamminga
A. G.E.M. de Boer
A. Petit
Y. Roquelaure
M. A. Greidanus
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Triage
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14271-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Public Health 1/2022 Go to the issue