Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2009

01-04-2009 | Original Article

Trends in Primary Care Clinician Perceptions of a New Electronic Health Record

Authors: Robert El-Kareh, MD, Tejal K. Gandhi, MD, MPH, Eric G. Poon, MD, MPH, Lisa P. Newmark, Jonathan Ungar, Stuart Lipsitz, ScD, Thomas D. Sequist, MD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Clinician perceptions of a newly implemented electronic health record play an important role in its success or failure.

Objective

To measure changes in primary care clinician attitudes toward an electronic health record during the first year following implementation.

Design

Longitudinal survey.

Participants

86 primary care clinicians surveyed between December 2006 and January 2008.

Measurements

Perceived impact on overall quality of care, patient safety, communication, and efficiency at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following implementation.

Results

Response rates for months 1, 3, 6, and 12 were 92%, 95%, 90%, and 82%, respectively. The proportion of clinicians agreeing that the EHR improved the overall quality of care (63% to 86%; p < 0.001), reduced medication-related errors (72% to 81%; p = 0.03), improved follow-up of test results (62% to 87%; p < 0.001), and improved communication among clinicians (72% to 93%; p < 0.001) increased from month 1 to month 12. During the same time period, a decreasing proportion of clinicians agreed that the EHR reduced the quality of patient interactions (49% to 33%; p = 0.001), resulted in longer patient visits (68% to 51%; p = 0.001), and increased time spent on medical documentation (78% to 68%; p = 0.006). Significant improvements in perceptions related to test result follow-up were first detected at 6 months, while those related to overall quality, efficiency, and communication were first identified at 12 months.

Conclusions

Primary care clinicians report increasingly positive perceptions of a new electronic health record within 1 year of implementation across a spectrum of domains of care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–645.PubMedCrossRef McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–645.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Poon EG, Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, Murff HJ, Karson AS, Bates DW. "I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2223–2228.PubMedCrossRef Poon EG, Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, Murff HJ, Karson AS, Bates DW. "I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2223–2228.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:121–8.PubMed Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:121–8.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1556–64.PubMedCrossRef Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1556–64.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:635–41.PubMedCrossRef Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:635–41.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Safran DG. Defining the future of primary care: what can we learn from patients? Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:248–55.PubMed Safran DG. Defining the future of primary care: what can we learn from patients? Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:248–55.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bates DW. Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1180–9.CrossRef Bates DW. Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1180–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:742–52.PubMed Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:742–52.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1103–17.CrossRef Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1103–17.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schoen C, Osborn R, Huynh PT, Doty M, Peugh J, Zapert K. On the front lines of care: primary care doctors’ office systems, experiences, and views in seven countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25:w555–71.CrossRef Schoen C, Osborn R, Huynh PT, Doty M, Peugh J, Zapert K. On the front lines of care: primary care doctors’ office systems, experiences, and views in seven countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25:w555–71.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gans D, Kralewski J, Hammons T, Dowd B. Medical groups’ adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1323–33.CrossRef Gans D, Kralewski J, Hammons T, Dowd B. Medical groups’ adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1323–33.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Menachemi N. Barriers to ambulatory EHR: who are ‘imminent adopters’ and how do they differ from other physicians? Inform Prim Care. 2006;14:101–8.PubMed Menachemi N. Barriers to ambulatory EHR: who are ‘imminent adopters’ and how do they differ from other physicians? Inform Prim Care. 2006;14:101–8.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Correlates of Electronic Health Record Adoption in Office Practices: A Statewide Survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006. Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Correlates of Electronic Health Record Adoption in Office Practices: A Statewide Survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006.
15.
go back to reference Baron RJ, Fabens EL, Schiffman M, Wolf E. Electronic health records: just around the corner? Or over the cliff? Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:222–6.PubMed Baron RJ, Fabens EL, Schiffman M, Wolf E. Electronic health records: just around the corner? Or over the cliff? Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:222–6.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:116–26.CrossRef Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:116–26.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Poon EG, Blumenthal D, Jaggi T, Honour MM, Bates DW, Kaushal R. Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in US hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:184–90.CrossRef Poon EG, Blumenthal D, Jaggi T, Honour MM, Bates DW, Kaushal R. Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in US hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:184–90.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Scott JT, Rundall TG, Vogt TM, Hsu J. Kaiser Permanente’s experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study. Bmj. 2005;331:1313–6.PubMedCrossRef Scott JT, Rundall TG, Vogt TM, Hsu J. Kaiser Permanente’s experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study. Bmj. 2005;331:1313–6.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Van Der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:235–43.PubMedCrossRef Van Der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:235–43.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Connolly C. Cedars-Sinai Doctors Cling to Pen and Paper. Washington Post. March 21, 2005: A01. Connolly C. Cedars-Sinai Doctors Cling to Pen and Paper. Washington Post. March 21, 2005: A01.
21.
go back to reference Sequist TD, Cullen T, Hays H, Taualii MM, Simon SR, Bates DW. Implementation and Use of an Electronic Health Record Within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007. Sequist TD, Cullen T, Hays H, Taualii MM, Simon SR, Bates DW. Implementation and Use of an Electronic Health Record Within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007.
22.
go back to reference Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:507–12.PubMedCrossRef Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:507–12.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280:1311–6.PubMedCrossRef Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280:1311–6.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2741–7.PubMedCrossRef Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2741–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Weiner M, Biondich P. The influence of information technology on patient-physician relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(Suppl 1):S35–9.PubMedCrossRef Weiner M, Biondich P. The influence of information technology on patient-physician relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(Suppl 1):S35–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ventres W, Kooienga S, Vuckovic N, Marlin R, Nygren P, Stewart V. Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:124–31.PubMedCrossRef Ventres W, Kooienga S, Vuckovic N, Marlin R, Nygren P, Stewart V. Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:124–31.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:505–16.PubMedCrossRef Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:505–16.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference van der Loo RP, van Gennip EM, Bakker AR, Hasman A, Rutten EF. Effects measured in the evaluation of automated information systems. Medinfo. 1995;8(Pt 2):1081–5.PubMed van der Loo RP, van Gennip EM, Bakker AR, Hasman A, Rutten EF. Effects measured in the evaluation of automated information systems. Medinfo. 1995;8(Pt 2):1081–5.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z. Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals. Biometrics. 2002;58:1–12.PubMedCrossRef Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z. Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals. Biometrics. 2002;58:1–12.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bates DW, Boyle DL, Rittenberg E, et al. What proportion of common diagnostic tests appear redundant? Am J Med. 1998;104:361–8.PubMedCrossRef Bates DW, Boyle DL, Rittenberg E, et al. What proportion of common diagnostic tests appear redundant? Am J Med. 1998;104:361–8.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Farber J, Siu A, Bloom P. How much time do physicians spend providing care outside of office visits? Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:693–8.PubMed Farber J, Siu A, Bloom P. How much time do physicians spend providing care outside of office visits? Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:693–8.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Assessing physician attitudes regarding use of an outpatient EMR: a longitudinal, multi-practice study. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:194–8. Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Assessing physician attitudes regarding use of an outpatient EMR: a longitudinal, multi-practice study. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:194–8.
33.
go back to reference Gamm LD, Barsukiewicz CK, Dansky KH, Vasey JJ, Bisordi JE, Thompson PC. Pre- and post-control model research on end-users’ satisfaction with an electronic medical record: preliminary results. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:225–9. Gamm LD, Barsukiewicz CK, Dansky KH, Vasey JJ, Bisordi JE, Thompson PC. Pre- and post-control model research on end-users’ satisfaction with an electronic medical record: preliminary results. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:225–9.
34.
go back to reference Joos D, Chen Q, Jirjis J, Johnson KB. An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:394–8. Joos D, Chen Q, Jirjis J, Johnson KB. An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:394–8.
35.
go back to reference O’Connell RT, Cho C, Shah N, Brown K, Shiffman RN. Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:43–9.PubMedCrossRef O’Connell RT, Cho C, Shah N, Brown K, Shiffman RN. Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:43–9.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kaelber D, Greco P, Cebul RD. Evaluation of a commercial electronic medical record (EMR) by primary care physicians 5 years after implementation. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:1002. Kaelber D, Greco P, Cebul RD. Evaluation of a commercial electronic medical record (EMR) by primary care physicians 5 years after implementation. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:1002.
37.
go back to reference Whitten P, Buis L, Mackert M. Factors impacting providers’ perceptions regarding a midwestern university-based EMR. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:391–7.PubMedCrossRef Whitten P, Buis L, Mackert M. Factors impacting providers’ perceptions regarding a midwestern university-based EMR. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:391–7.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Krall MA. Acceptance and performance by clinicians using an ambulatory electronic medical record in an HMO. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:708–11. Krall MA. Acceptance and performance by clinicians using an ambulatory electronic medical record in an HMO. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:708–11.
39.
go back to reference Chin HL, McClure P. Evaluating a comprehensive outpatient clinical information system: a case study and model for system evaluation. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:717–21. Chin HL, McClure P. Evaluating a comprehensive outpatient clinical information system: a case study and model for system evaluation. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:717–21.
40.
go back to reference Kemper AR, Uren RL, Clark SJ. Adoption of electronic health records in primary care pediatric practices. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e20–4.PubMedCrossRef Kemper AR, Uren RL, Clark SJ. Adoption of electronic health records in primary care pediatric practices. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e20–4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trends in Primary Care Clinician Perceptions of a New Electronic Health Record
Authors
Robert El-Kareh, MD
Tejal K. Gandhi, MD, MPH
Eric G. Poon, MD, MPH
Lisa P. Newmark
Jonathan Ungar
Stuart Lipsitz, ScD
Thomas D. Sequist, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-0906-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2009 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.