Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2017

01-11-2017 | Epidemiology

Trends in adjuvant therapies after breast-conserving surgery for hormone receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the National Cancer Database, 2004–2013

Authors: Yasuaki Sagara, Rachel A. Freedman, Stephanie M. Wong, Fatih Aydogan, Anvy Nguyen, William T. Barry, Mehra Golshan

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) with or without endocrine therapy (ET) is a standard treatment option for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We sought to investigate national patterns in the use of adjuvant therapy after BCS for hormone receptor (HR)-positive DCIS over time.

Patients and methods

Using data from the National Cancer Data Base, we identified patients diagnosed with DCIS and treated with BCS between 2004 and 2013. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of adjuvant therapy use controlling for clinicopathologic demographic and facility-level characteristics.

Results

We identified 66,079 patients who underwent BCS for DCIS. Overall, 21% received no adjuvant treatment, 71% received RT, 48% received ET, and 38% received the combination therapy. In adjusted analyses among the patients with HR-positive DCIS (n = 50,147), the administration of RT decreased (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.770.97), while the use of ET increased (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.41.6) in 2013 compared to 2004. Young patients, elderly patients, positive margin status, and Medicare insurance were associated with lower use of both RT and ET. We observed both clinicopathologic and geographic variation in the use of adjuvant therapies. In the lowest risk subgroup, the use of RT decreased from 57% in 2004 to 48% in 2013 (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.450.89).

Conclusion

Our study suggests a shift in patterns of care for DCIS that is impacted by both clinicopathologic and demographic factors, with the use of RT decreasing and the use of ET increasing in HR-positive DCIS patients. Current trials are designed to address the possible over-treatment of low-risk DCIS.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Virnig BA, Shamliyan T, Tuttle TM et al (2009) Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 185:1–549 Virnig BA, Shamliyan T, Tuttle TM et al (2009) Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 185:1–549
5.
go back to reference Sagara Y, Freedman RA, Vaz-Luis I et al (2016) Patient prognostic score and associations with survival improvement offered by radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based longitudinal cohort study. J Clin Oncol 34(11):1190–1196. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.65.1869 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sagara Y, Freedman RA, Vaz-Luis I et al (2016) Patient prognostic score and associations with survival improvement offered by radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based longitudinal cohort study. J Clin Oncol 34(11):1190–1196. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2015.​65.​1869 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Correa C, McGale P, Taylor C et al (2010) Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010(41):162–177CrossRefPubMed Correa C, McGale P, Taylor C et al (2010) Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010(41):162–177CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lo AC, Truong PT, Wai ES et al (2015) Population-based analysis of the impact and generalizability of the NSABP-B24 study on endocrine therapy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Oncol 26(9):1898–1903. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv251 CrossRefPubMed Lo AC, Truong PT, Wai ES et al (2015) Population-based analysis of the impact and generalizability of the NSABP-B24 study on endocrine therapy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Oncol 26(9):1898–1903. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdv251 CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology—Breast Cancer version 2. 2017. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. http://www.nccn.com. Accessed 24 May 2017 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology—Breast Cancer version 2. 2017. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. http://​www.​nccn.​com. Accessed 24 May 2017
15.
go back to reference Silverstein MJ (2003) The University of Southern California/Van Nuys prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg 186(4):337–343CrossRefPubMed Silverstein MJ (2003) The University of Southern California/Van Nuys prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg 186(4):337–343CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Virnig BA, Durham SB et al (2004) Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(6):443–448CrossRefPubMed Baxter NN, Virnig BA, Durham SB et al (2004) Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(6):443–448CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
24.
26.
go back to reference Wong JS, Chen YH, Gadd MA et al (2014) Eight-year update of a prospective study of wide excision alone for small low- or intermediate-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(2):343–350. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2813-6 CrossRefPubMed Wong JS, Chen YH, Gadd MA et al (2014) Eight-year update of a prospective study of wide excision alone for small low- or intermediate-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(2):343–350. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-013-2813-6 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Trends in adjuvant therapies after breast-conserving surgery for hormone receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the National Cancer Database, 2004–2013
Authors
Yasuaki Sagara
Rachel A. Freedman
Stephanie M. Wong
Fatih Aydogan
Anvy Nguyen
William T. Barry
Mehra Golshan
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4436-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine