Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 3/2018

Open Access 01-06-2018 | Original Research

Treatment Intensification in Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Study of 2-OAD Regimens, GLP-1 RAs, or Basal Insulin

Authors: Lawrence Blonde, Denis Raccah, Elisheva Lew, Juliana Meyers, Elena Nikonova, Mayank Ajmera, Keith L. Davis, Monica Bertolini, Bruno Guerci

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Treatment guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to glycemia management in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but this may result in uncontrolled glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between steps. This retrospective analysis compared clinical and economic outcomes among patients with uncontrolled T2D initiating two oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), or basal insulin in a real-world setting.

Methods

Adults with T2D on OAD monotherapy were identified in the MarketScan claims database (2007–2014). Those initiating two OADs (simultaneously or sequentially), GLP-1 RAs, or basal insulin were selected (date of initiation was termed the ‘index date’); patients were required to have HbA1c > 7.0% in the 6 months pre-index date. HbA1c was compared from 6 months pre- to 1-year post-index. Annual all-cause healthcare utilization and costs were reported over the 1-year follow-up period.

Results

Data for 6054 patients were analyzed (2-OAD, n = 4442; GLP-1 RA, n = 361; basal insulin, n = 1251). Baseline HbA1c was high in all cohorts, but highest in the basal-insulin cohort. Treatment initiation resulted in reductions in HbA1c in all cohorts, which was generally maintained throughout the follow-up period. Average HbA1c reductions from the 6 months pre- to 1 year post-index date were −1.2% for GLP-1 RA, −1.6% for OADs, and −1.8% for basal insulin. HbA1c < 7.0% at 1 year occurred in 32.6%, 47.5%, and 41.1% of patients, respectively. Annual healthcare costs (mean [SD]) were lowest for OAD (US$10,074 [$22,276]) followed by GLP-1 RA (US$14,052 [$23,829]) and basal insulin (US$18,813 [$37,332]).

Conclusion

Despite robust HbA1c lowering following treatment initiation, many patients did not achieve HbA1c < 7.0%. Basal insulin, generally prescribed for patients with high baseline HbA1c, was associated with a large reduction in HbA1c and with higher costs. Therapy intensification at an appropriate time could lead to clinical and economic benefits and should be investigated further.

Funding

Sanofi U.S., Inc.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2017. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl. 1):S1–135. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2017. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl. 1):S1–135.
2.
go back to reference Garber AJ, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm—2018 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2018;24(1):91–120.CrossRef Garber AJ, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm—2018 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2018;24(1):91–120.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm—2017 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2017;23:207–38.CrossRef Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm—2017 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2017;23:207–38.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brown JB, Nichols GA. Slow response to loss of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Manag Care. 2003;9:213–7.PubMed Brown JB, Nichols GA. Slow response to loss of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Manag Care. 2003;9:213–7.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Khunti K, Wolden ML, Thorsted BL, Andersen M, Davies MJ. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3411–7.CrossRef Khunti K, Wolden ML, Thorsted BL, Andersen M, Davies MJ. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3411–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, Rust KF, Cowie CC. The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988–2010. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2271–9.CrossRef Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, Rust KF, Cowie CC. The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988–2010. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2271–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Khunti K. Addressing barriers to initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2010;4(Suppl. 1):S11–8.CrossRef Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Khunti K. Addressing barriers to initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2010;4(Suppl. 1):S11–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lin J, Zhou S, Wei W, Pan C, Lingohr-Smith M, Levin P. Does clinical inertia vary by personalized A1C goal? A study of predictors and prevalence of clinical inertia in a U.S. managed-care setting. Endocr Pract. 2016;22:151–61.CrossRef Lin J, Zhou S, Wei W, Pan C, Lingohr-Smith M, Levin P. Does clinical inertia vary by personalized A1C goal? A study of predictors and prevalence of clinical inertia in a U.S. managed-care setting. Endocr Pract. 2016;22:151–61.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Reach G. Patient non-adherence and healthcare-provider inertia are clinical myopia. Diabetes Metab J. 2008;34(4 pt 1):382–5.CrossRef Reach G. Patient non-adherence and healthcare-provider inertia are clinical myopia. Diabetes Metab J. 2008;34(4 pt 1):382–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Reach G, Pechtner V, Gentilella R, Corcos A, Ceriello A. Clinical inertia and its impact on treatment intensification in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. 2017 (Epub ahead of print). Reach G, Pechtner V, Gentilella R, Corcos A, Ceriello A. Clinical inertia and its impact on treatment intensification in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. 2017 (Epub ahead of print).
11.
go back to reference Phillips L, Branch W, Cook C, et al. Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(9):825–34.CrossRef Phillips L, Branch W, Cook C, et al. Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(9):825–34.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grant RW, Cagliero E, Dubey AK, et al. Clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes metabolic risk factors. Diabet Med. 2004;21:150–5.CrossRef Grant RW, Cagliero E, Dubey AK, et al. Clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes metabolic risk factors. Diabet Med. 2004;21:150–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nichols GA, Koo YH, Shah SN. Delay of insulin addition to oral combination therapy despite inadequate glycemic control: delay of insulin therapy. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:453–8.CrossRef Nichols GA, Koo YH, Shah SN. Delay of insulin addition to oral combination therapy despite inadequate glycemic control: delay of insulin therapy. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:453–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Roussel R, Gourdy P, Gautier JF, et al. Low rate of intensification in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled with basal insulin: the INTERDIA study. Diabetes Manag. 2016;6:119–27. Roussel R, Gourdy P, Gautier JF, et al. Low rate of intensification in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled with basal insulin: the INTERDIA study. Diabetes Manag. 2016;6:119–27.
15.
go back to reference Wagner EH, Sandhu N, Newton KM, McCulloch DK, Ramsey SD, Grothaus LC. Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization. JAMA. 2001;285:182–9.CrossRef Wagner EH, Sandhu N, Newton KM, McCulloch DK, Ramsey SD, Grothaus LC. Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization. JAMA. 2001;285:182–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Levin PA, Zhou S, Gill J, Wei W. Health outcomes associated with initiation of basal insulin after 1, 2, or ≥ 3 oral antidiabetes drug(s) among managed care patients with type 2 diabetes. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:1172–81.PubMed Levin PA, Zhou S, Gill J, Wei W. Health outcomes associated with initiation of basal insulin after 1, 2, or ≥ 3 oral antidiabetes drug(s) among managed care patients with type 2 diabetes. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:1172–81.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Smolen HJ, Murphy DR, Gahn JC, Yu X, Curtis BH. The evaluation of clinical and cost outcomes associated with earlier initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014;20:968–84.PubMed Smolen HJ, Murphy DR, Gahn JC, Yu X, Curtis BH. The evaluation of clinical and cost outcomes associated with earlier initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014;20:968–84.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Bonafede M, Chandran A, DiMario S, Saltiel-Berzin R, Saliu D. Medication usage, treatment intensification, and medical cost in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective database study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016;4:e000189.CrossRef Bonafede M, Chandran A, DiMario S, Saltiel-Berzin R, Saliu D. Medication usage, treatment intensification, and medical cost in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective database study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016;4:e000189.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mauricio D, Meneghini L, Seufert J, et al. Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia burden in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating basal insulin in Europe and the USA. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:1155–64.CrossRef Mauricio D, Meneghini L, Seufert J, et al. Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia burden in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating basal insulin in Europe and the USA. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:1155–64.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fu AZ, Sheehan JJ. Treatment intensification for patients with type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18:892–8.CrossRef Fu AZ, Sheehan JJ. Treatment intensification for patients with type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18:892–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ajmera M, Raval A, Zhou S, et al. A real-world observational study of time to treatment intensification among elderly patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:1184–93.PubMedPubMedCentral Ajmera M, Raval A, Zhou S, et al. A real-world observational study of time to treatment intensification among elderly patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:1184–93.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Thayer S, Wei W, Buysman E, et al. The INITIATOR study: pilot data on real-world clinical and economic outcomes in US patients with type 2 diabetes initiating injectable therapy. Adv Ther. 2013;30:1128–40.CrossRef Thayer S, Wei W, Buysman E, et al. The INITIATOR study: pilot data on real-world clinical and economic outcomes in US patients with type 2 diabetes initiating injectable therapy. Adv Ther. 2013;30:1128–40.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Levin P, Lin J, Wei W, et al. Initiating injectable therapy in US managed care patients with diabetes. Am J Pharm Benefits. 2014;6:e93–102. Levin P, Lin J, Wei W, et al. Initiating injectable therapy in US managed care patients with diabetes. Am J Pharm Benefits. 2014;6:e93–102.
26.
go back to reference Davis SN, Wei W, Garg S. Clinical impact of initiating insulin glargine therapy with disposable pen versus vial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a managed care setting. Endocr Pract. 2011;17:845–52.CrossRef Davis SN, Wei W, Garg S. Clinical impact of initiating insulin glargine therapy with disposable pen versus vial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a managed care setting. Endocr Pract. 2011;17:845–52.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dalal MR, Xie L, Baser O, DiGenio A. Adding rapid-acting insulin or GLP-1 receptor agonist to basal insulin: outcomes in a community setting. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:68–76.CrossRef Dalal MR, Xie L, Baser O, DiGenio A. Adding rapid-acting insulin or GLP-1 receptor agonist to basal insulin: outcomes in a community setting. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:68–76.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bieszk N, Reynolds SL, Wei W, Davis C, Kamble P, Uribe C. “Act on threes” paradigm for treatment intensification of type 2 diabetes in managed care: results of a randomized controlled study with an educational intervention targeting improved glycemic control. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016;22:1028–38.PubMed Bieszk N, Reynolds SL, Wei W, Davis C, Kamble P, Uribe C. “Act on threes” paradigm for treatment intensification of type 2 diabetes in managed care: results of a randomized controlled study with an educational intervention targeting improved glycemic control. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016;22:1028–38.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Ayyagari R, Wei W, Cheng D, Pan C, Signorovitch J, Wu EQ. Effect of adherence and insulin delivery system on clinical and economic outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin treatment. Value Health. 2015;18:198–205.CrossRef Ayyagari R, Wei W, Cheng D, Pan C, Signorovitch J, Wu EQ. Effect of adherence and insulin delivery system on clinical and economic outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin treatment. Value Health. 2015;18:198–205.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Riley GF. Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data. Med Care. 2009;47(7 Suppl. 1):S51–5.CrossRef Riley GF. Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data. Med Care. 2009;47(7 Suppl. 1):S51–5.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Carls GS, Tuttle E, Tan RD, Huynh J, Yee J, Edelman SV, Polonsky WH. Understanding the gap between efficacy in randomized controlled trials and effectiveness in real-world use of GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(11):1469–78.CrossRef Carls GS, Tuttle E, Tan RD, Huynh J, Yee J, Edelman SV, Polonsky WH. Understanding the gap between efficacy in randomized controlled trials and effectiveness in real-world use of GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(11):1469–78.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Roussel R, Charbonnel B, Behar M, Gourmelen J, Emery C, Detournay B. Persistence with Insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes in France: an insurance claims study. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7:537–49.CrossRef Roussel R, Charbonnel B, Behar M, Gourmelen J, Emery C, Detournay B. Persistence with Insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes in France: an insurance claims study. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7:537–49.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Treatment Intensification in Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Study of 2-OAD Regimens, GLP-1 RAs, or Basal Insulin
Authors
Lawrence Blonde
Denis Raccah
Elisheva Lew
Juliana Meyers
Elena Nikonova
Mayank Ajmera
Keith L. Davis
Monica Bertolini
Bruno Guerci
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0429-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Diabetes Therapy 3/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.