Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2017

01-10-2017

Transduodenal–transpapillary endopancreatic surgery with a rigid resectoscope: experiments on ex vivo, in vivo animal models and human cadavers

Authors: Philip C. Müller, Daniel C. Steinemann, Felix Nickel, Lukas Chinczewski, Beat P. Müller-Stich, Georg R. Linke, Kaspar Z’graggen

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgery for chronic pancreatitis is afflicted with high morbidity. A novel transduodenal–transpapillary endopancreatic resection (EPR) may provide a less invasive alternative approach.

Materials and Methods

After laparoscopic duodenotomy the papilla was dilated and accessed with a rigid resectoscope. A resection of pancreatic head tissue was performed from inside the organ. First, the feasibility and resection volume were assessed in bovine pancreas. Bleeding and intraoperative complications were evaluated in an acute in vivo pig model. Finally, the total laparoscopic approach was tested in human cadavers.

Results

EPR was feasible in 6/6 bovine and 5/6 porcine pancreases; in one case the papilla could not be located. The resected surface accounted for 30 (23–39)% of the total pancreatic surface and the resection volume was 14.2 (9–25) cm3. In vivo blood loss was minimal [10 (5–20) ml]. The operating time for EPR was 84 (75–110) min in all cadavers.

Conclusion

The EPR technique is feasible and provides a resection comparable with duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR). Given the reduced surgical trauma, EPR may emerge as a minimally invasive alternative to DPPHR.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jimenez RE, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Chang Y, Warshaw AL (2000) Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 231(3):293–300CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jimenez RE, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Chang Y, Warshaw AL (2000) Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 231(3):293–300CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Nio Y, Rauws EAJ, Boermeester MA, Busch OR et al (2007) Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 356(7):676–684CrossRefPubMed Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Nio Y, Rauws EAJ, Boermeester MA, Busch OR et al (2007) Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 356(7):676–684CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Díte P, Ruzicka M, Zboril V, Novotný I (2003) A prospective, randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 35(7):553–558CrossRefPubMed Díte P, Ruzicka M, Zboril V, Novotný I (2003) A prospective, randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 35(7):553–558CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Müller-Stich BP, Senft JD, Lasitschka F, Shevchenko M, Billeter AT, Bruckner T et al (2014) Polypropylene, polyester or polytetrafluoroethylene-is there an ideal material for mesh augmentation at the esophageal hiatus? Results from an experimental study in a porcine model. Hernia 18(6):873–881CrossRefPubMed Müller-Stich BP, Senft JD, Lasitschka F, Shevchenko M, Billeter AT, Bruckner T et al (2014) Polypropylene, polyester or polytetrafluoroethylene-is there an ideal material for mesh augmentation at the esophageal hiatus? Results from an experimental study in a porcine model. Hernia 18(6):873–881CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tan C-L, Zhang H, Li K-Z (2015) Single center experience in selecting the laparoscopic Frey procedure for chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 21(44):12644–12652CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tan C-L, Zhang H, Li K-Z (2015) Single center experience in selecting the laparoscopic Frey procedure for chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 21(44):12644–12652CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Banz VM, Müller PC, Tinguely P, Inderbitzin D, Ribes D, Peterhans M et al (2016) Intraoperative image-guided navigation system: development and applicability in 65 patients undergoing liver surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(4):495–502CrossRefPubMed Banz VM, Müller PC, Tinguely P, Inderbitzin D, Ribes D, Peterhans M et al (2016) Intraoperative image-guided navigation system: development and applicability in 65 patients undergoing liver surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(4):495–502CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nickel F, Kenngott HG, Neuhaus J, Sommer CM, Gehrig T, Kolb A et al (2013) Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 27(10):3663–3670CrossRefPubMed Nickel F, Kenngott HG, Neuhaus J, Sommer CM, Gehrig T, Kolb A et al (2013) Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 27(10):3663–3670CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kondo H, Naitoh I, Ohara H, Nakazawa T, Hayashi K, Okumura F et al (2014) Efficacy of pancreatic stenting prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic stones. Dig Liver Dis 46(7):639–644CrossRefPubMed Kondo H, Naitoh I, Ohara H, Nakazawa T, Hayashi K, Okumura F et al (2014) Efficacy of pancreatic stenting prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic stones. Dig Liver Dis 46(7):639–644CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dumonceau J-M, Andriulli A, Elmunzer BJ, Mariani A, Meister T, Deviere J et al (2014) Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline—updated June 2014. Endoscopy 46(9):799–815CrossRefPubMed Dumonceau J-M, Andriulli A, Elmunzer BJ, Mariani A, Meister T, Deviere J et al (2014) Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline—updated June 2014. Endoscopy 46(9):799–815CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schmitt F, Maignan A, Ploteau S, Hamel A, Lagier S, Blin Y et al (2010) New anatomical data on the drainage patterns of the uncinate process of the pancreas. Surg Radiol Anat 32(8):777–781CrossRefPubMed Schmitt F, Maignan A, Ploteau S, Hamel A, Lagier S, Blin Y et al (2010) New anatomical data on the drainage patterns of the uncinate process of the pancreas. Surg Radiol Anat 32(8):777–781CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rogers CS, Stoltz DA, Meyerholz DK, Ostedgaard LS, Rokhlina T, Taft PJ et al (2008) Disruption of the CFTR gene produces a model of cystic fibrosis in newborn pigs. Science 321(5897):1837–1841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rogers CS, Stoltz DA, Meyerholz DK, Ostedgaard LS, Rokhlina T, Taft PJ et al (2008) Disruption of the CFTR gene produces a model of cystic fibrosis in newborn pigs. Science 321(5897):1837–1841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Uc A, Giriyappa R, Meyerholz DK, Griffin M, Ostedgaard LS, Tang XX et al (2012) Pancreatic and biliary secretion are both altered in cystic fibrosis pigs. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 303(8):G961–G968CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Uc A, Giriyappa R, Meyerholz DK, Griffin M, Ostedgaard LS, Tang XX et al (2012) Pancreatic and biliary secretion are both altered in cystic fibrosis pigs. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 303(8):G961–G968CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Beger HG, Schoenberg MH, Link KH, Safi F, Berger D (1997) Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection—a standard method in chronic pancreatitis. Chir Z Alle Geb Oper Medizen 68(9):874–880CrossRef Beger HG, Schoenberg MH, Link KH, Safi F, Berger D (1997) Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection—a standard method in chronic pancreatitis. Chir Z Alle Geb Oper Medizen 68(9):874–880CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Frey CF, Amikura K (1994) Local resection of the head of the pancreas combined with longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy in the management of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 220(4):492-504-507CrossRef Frey CF, Amikura K (1994) Local resection of the head of the pancreas combined with longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy in the management of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 220(4):492-504-507CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Keus E, van Laarhoven CJHM, Eddes EH, Masclee AAM, Schipper MEI, Gooszen HG (2003) Size of the pancreatic head as a prognostic factor for the outcome of Beger’s procedure for painful chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 90(3):320–324CrossRefPubMed Keus E, van Laarhoven CJHM, Eddes EH, Masclee AAM, Schipper MEI, Gooszen HG (2003) Size of the pancreatic head as a prognostic factor for the outcome of Beger’s procedure for painful chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 90(3):320–324CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Song KB, Kim SC, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee DJ, Lee JW et al (2015) Enucleation for benign or low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas: single-center experience with 65 consecutive patients. Surgery 158(5):1203–1210CrossRefPubMed Song KB, Kim SC, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee DJ, Lee JW et al (2015) Enucleation for benign or low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas: single-center experience with 65 consecutive patients. Surgery 158(5):1203–1210CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zhang R-C, Zhou Y-C, Mou Y-P, Huang C-J, Jin W-W, Yan J-F et al (2016) Laparoscopic versus open enucleation for pancreatic neoplasms: clinical outcomes and pancreatic function analysis. Surg Endosc 30(7):2657–2665CrossRefPubMed Zhang R-C, Zhou Y-C, Mou Y-P, Huang C-J, Jin W-W, Yan J-F et al (2016) Laparoscopic versus open enucleation for pancreatic neoplasms: clinical outcomes and pancreatic function analysis. Surg Endosc 30(7):2657–2665CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Transduodenal–transpapillary endopancreatic surgery with a rigid resectoscope: experiments on ex vivo, in vivo animal models and human cadavers
Authors
Philip C. Müller
Daniel C. Steinemann
Felix Nickel
Lukas Chinczewski
Beat P. Müller-Stich
Georg R. Linke
Kaspar Z’graggen
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5465-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2017 Go to the issue