Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2013

01-10-2013

Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model

Authors: Felix Nickel, Hannes G. Kenngott, Jochen Neuhaus, Christof M. Sommer, Tobias Gehrig, Armin Kolb, Matthias Gondan, Boris A. Radeleff, Anja Schaible, Hans-Peter Meinzer, Carsten N. Gutt, Beat-Peter Müller-Stich

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Navigation systems potentially facilitate minimally invasive esophagectomy and improve patient outcome by improving intraoperative orientation, position estimation of instruments, and identification of lymph nodes and resection margins. The authors’ self-developed navigation system is highly accurate in static environments. This study aimed to test the overall accuracy of the navigation system in a realistic operating room scenario and to identify the different sources of error altering accuracy.

Methods

To simulate a realistic environment, a porcine model (n = 5) was used with endoscopic clips in the esophagus as navigation targets. Computed tomography imaging was followed by image segmentation and target definition with the medical imaging interaction toolkit software. Optical tracking was used for registration and localization of animals and navigation instruments. Intraoperatively, the instrument was displayed relative to segmented organs in real time. The target registration error (TRE) of the navigation system was defined as the distance between the target and the navigation instrument tip. The TRE was measured on skin targets with the animal in the 0° supine and 25° anti-Trendelenburg position and on the esophagus during laparoscopic transhiatal preparation.

Results

On skin targets, the TRE was significantly higher in the 25° position, at 14.6 ± 2.7 mm, compared with the 0° position, at 3.2 ± 1.3 mm. The TRE on the esophagus was 11.2 ± 2.4 mm. The main source of error was soft tissue deformation caused by intraoperative positioning, pneumoperitoneum, surgical manipulation, and tissue dissection.

Conclusion

The navigation system obtained acceptable accuracy with a minimally invasive transhiatal approach to the esophagus in a realistic experimental model. Thus the system has the potential to improve intraoperative orientation, identification of lymph nodes and adequate resection margins, and visualization of risk structures. Compensation methods for soft tissue deformation may lead to an even more accurate navigation system in the future.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Perry KA et al (2009) Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma. Arch Surg 144:679–684PubMedCrossRef Perry KA et al (2009) Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma. Arch Surg 144:679–684PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Verhage RJ et al (2009) Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 64:135–146PubMed Verhage RJ et al (2009) Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 64:135–146PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bottger T et al (2007) Minimally invasive transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1695–1700PubMedCrossRef Bottger T et al (2007) Minimally invasive transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1695–1700PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Smithers BM (2010) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: an overview. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:91–99PubMedCrossRef Smithers BM (2010) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: an overview. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:91–99PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nagpal K et al (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24(7):1621–1629PubMedCrossRef Nagpal K et al (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24(7):1621–1629PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eisold S et al (2008) Experimental study of cardiorespiratory and stress factors in esophageal surgery using robot-assisted thoracoscopic or open thoracic approach. Arch Surg 143:156–163PubMedCrossRef Eisold S et al (2008) Experimental study of cardiorespiratory and stress factors in esophageal surgery using robot-assisted thoracoscopic or open thoracic approach. Arch Surg 143:156–163PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Oida T et al (2011) Laparoscopic transhiatal approach for cardiac cancer with lower esophageal invasion for patients with compromised respiratory function. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1847–1850PubMed Oida T et al (2011) Laparoscopic transhiatal approach for cardiac cancer with lower esophageal invasion for patients with compromised respiratory function. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1847–1850PubMed
8.
go back to reference Gutt CN et al (2006) Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:428–434PubMedCrossRef Gutt CN et al (2006) Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:428–434PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bizekis C et al (2006) Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 82:402–406 discussion 406–407PubMedCrossRef Bizekis C et al (2006) Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 82:402–406 discussion 406–407PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carr SR, Luketich JD (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: an update on the options available. Minerva Chir 63:481–495PubMed Carr SR, Luketich JD (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: an update on the options available. Minerva Chir 63:481–495PubMed
11.
go back to reference Pennathur A, Awais O, Luketich JD (2010) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for Barrett’s with high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Gastrointest Surg 14:948–950PubMedCrossRef Pennathur A, Awais O, Luketich JD (2010) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for Barrett’s with high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Gastrointest Surg 14:948–950PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Barbour AP et al (2007) Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome. Ann Surg 246:1–8PubMedCrossRef Barbour AP et al (2007) Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome. Ann Surg 246:1–8PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Kenngott HG et al (2008) Development of a navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1858–1865PubMedCrossRef Kenngott HG et al (2008) Development of a navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1858–1865PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Baumhauer M et al (2008) Navigation in endoscopic soft tissue surgery: perspectives and limitations. J Endourol 22:751–766PubMedCrossRef Baumhauer M et al (2008) Navigation in endoscopic soft tissue surgery: perspectives and limitations. J Endourol 22:751–766PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Beumer HW, Puscas L (2009) Computer modeling and navigation in maxillofacial surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17:270–273PubMedCrossRef Beumer HW, Puscas L (2009) Computer modeling and navigation in maxillofacial surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17:270–273PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Biasca N, Wirth S, Bungartz M (2009) Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA). Knee 16:22–29PubMedCrossRef Biasca N, Wirth S, Bungartz M (2009) Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA). Knee 16:22–29PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Simpfendorfer T et al (2011) Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 25(12):1841–1845PubMedCrossRef Simpfendorfer T et al (2011) Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 25(12):1841–1845PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lango T et al (2008) Navigation in laparoscopy: prototype research platform for improved image-guided surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17:17–33PubMedCrossRef Lango T et al (2008) Navigation in laparoscopy: prototype research platform for improved image-guided surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17:17–33PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Marvik R et al (2005) Image-guided laparoscopic surgery: review and current status. Minerva Chir 60:305–325PubMed Marvik R et al (2005) Image-guided laparoscopic surgery: review and current status. Minerva Chir 60:305–325PubMed
21.
22.
go back to reference Maleike D et al (2009) Interactive segmentation framework of the medical imaging interaction toolkit. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 96:72–83PubMedCrossRef Maleike D et al (2009) Interactive segmentation framework of the medical imaging interaction toolkit. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 96:72–83PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Stein D et al (2010) The extensible open-source rigid and affine image registration module of the medical imaging interaction toolkit (MITK). Comput Methods Programs Biomed 100:79–86PubMedCrossRef Stein D et al (2010) The extensible open-source rigid and affine image registration module of the medical imaging interaction toolkit (MITK). Comput Methods Programs Biomed 100:79–86PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CR Jr (1998) Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17:694–702PubMedCrossRef Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CR Jr (1998) Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17:694–702PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick JM, West JB (2001) The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:917–927PubMedCrossRef Fitzpatrick JM, West JB (2001) The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:917–927PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dieleman EM et al (2007) Four-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of esophageal mobility during normal respiration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67:775–780PubMedCrossRef Dieleman EM et al (2007) Four-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of esophageal mobility during normal respiration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67:775–780PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hashimoto T et al (2005) Real-time monitoring of a digestive tract marker to reduce adverse effects of moving organs at risk (OAR) in radiotherapy for thoracic and abdominal tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:1559–1564PubMedCrossRef Hashimoto T et al (2005) Real-time monitoring of a digestive tract marker to reduce adverse effects of moving organs at risk (OAR) in radiotherapy for thoracic and abdominal tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:1559–1564PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Glossop ND (2009) Advantages of optical compared with electromagnetic tracking. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 1):23–28PubMedCrossRef Glossop ND (2009) Advantages of optical compared with electromagnetic tracking. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 1):23–28PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kenngott HG et al (2013) Magnetic tracking in the operation room using the da Vinci telemanipulator is feasible. J Robot Surg 7:59–64PubMedCrossRef Kenngott HG et al (2013) Magnetic tracking in the operation room using the da Vinci telemanipulator is feasible. J Robot Surg 7:59–64PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Li Q, Castell JA, Castell DO (1994) Manometric determination of esophageal length. Am J Gastroenterol 89:722–725PubMed Li Q, Castell JA, Castell DO (1994) Manometric determination of esophageal length. Am J Gastroenterol 89:722–725PubMed
32.
go back to reference Wang ZY (1991) The length of the esophagus measured by SND-1 esophagus detector: report of 197 cases. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 29:566–590PubMed Wang ZY (1991) The length of the esophagus measured by SND-1 esophagus detector: report of 197 cases. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 29:566–590PubMed
33.
go back to reference Wei XH (1989) Measurement of the length of the adult esophagus using a fiberogastroscope: 104 cases. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 27(407–408):444–445 Wei XH (1989) Measurement of the length of the adult esophagus using a fiberogastroscope: 104 cases. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 27(407–408):444–445
Metadata
Title
Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model
Authors
Felix Nickel
Hannes G. Kenngott
Jochen Neuhaus
Christof M. Sommer
Tobias Gehrig
Armin Kolb
Matthias Gondan
Boris A. Radeleff
Anja Schaible
Hans-Peter Meinzer
Carsten N. Gutt
Beat-Peter Müller-Stich
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2941-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2013 Go to the issue