Published in:
01-04-2013 | Original Paper
Transarterial chemoembolization combined with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus TACE and PRFA monotherapy in the treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis
Authors:
Jia-yan Ni, Shan-shan Liu, Lin-feng Xu, Hong-liang Sun, Yao-ting Chen
Published in:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
|
Issue 4/2013
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
This meta-analysis was designed to compare the effectiveness of the combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) with that of TACE and PRFA monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods
Randomized controlled trials were searched using various databases, and six studies were revealed on comparing TACE plus PRFA with TACE and/or PRFA alone for the treatment for HCC. Overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate were analyzed and compared. All statistic analyses were conducted using Review Manager (version 4.2.2.) from the Cochrane collaboration.
Results
Meta-analysis data revealed that TACE plus PRFA had significantly better effectiveness on 1- and 3-year overall survival rate(odds ratio [OR] 1-year = 4.61, 95 % confidence interval [95 % CI] 2.26–9.42, P < 0.0001; OR 3-year = 2.79, 95 % CI 1.69–4.61, P < 0.0001) and 3-year recurrence-free survival rate ([OR] 3-year = 3.00, [95 % CI] 1.75–5.13, P < 0.0001) than that of TACE and/or PRFA alone treatment. There was no significant difference between the combined therapy and monotherapy on 1-year recurrence-free survival rate ([OR] 1-year = 1.55, [95 % CI] 0.91–2.65, P = 0.11).
Conclusions
The data of our study indicate that the combination of TACE and PRFA has better effectiveness than that of TACE and PRFA monotherapy in the treatment for patients with HCC.