Skip to main content
Top
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stanford EJ, Cassidenti A, Moen MD (2012) Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Int Urogynecol J 23:19–28. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1584-z PubMedCrossRef Stanford EJ, Cassidenti A, Moen MD (2012) Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Int Urogynecol J 23:19–28. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-011-1584-z PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Rane A, Frazer M, Lim Y (2012) Comment on Stanford et al.: traditional native tissue vs mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Int Urogynecol J 23:1317. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1871-3 PubMedCrossRef Dietz HP, Rane A, Frazer M, Lim Y (2012) Comment on Stanford et al.: traditional native tissue vs mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Int Urogynecol J 23:1317. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-012-1871-3 PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stanford E, Moen M, Cassidenti A (2012) Traditional native tissue vs mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Reply. Int Urogynecol J 23:1319–1320. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1872-2 CrossRef Stanford E, Moen M, Cassidenti A (2012) Traditional native tissue vs mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Reply. Int Urogynecol J 23:1319–1320. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-012-1872-2 CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed
5.
go back to reference Chmielewski L, Walters MD, Weber AM, Barber MD (2011) Reanalysis of a randomized trial of 3 techniques of anterior colporrhaphy using clinically relevant definitions of success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:69.e1–69.e8CrossRef Chmielewski L, Walters MD, Weber AM, Barber MD (2011) Reanalysis of a randomized trial of 3 techniques of anterior colporrhaphy using clinically relevant definitions of success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:69.e1–69.e8CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA (2001) Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1299–1304PubMedCrossRef Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA (2001) Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1299–1304PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, Wang W, Schaffer J (2005) Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:795–806PubMedCrossRef Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, Wang W, Schaffer J (2005) Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:795–806PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Miller D, Lucente V, Babin E, Beach P, Jones P, Robinson D (2011) Prospective clinical assessment of the transvaginal mesh technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-5-year results. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 17:139–143PubMedCrossRef Miller D, Lucente V, Babin E, Beach P, Jones P, Robinson D (2011) Prospective clinical assessment of the transvaginal mesh technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-5-year results. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 17:139–143PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cosson M, Rosenthal C, Debodinance P, Berrocal J, Clavé H, Gauld J, Jacquetin B (2010) TVM group: Trans-vaginal mesh technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: 5 years prospective follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 21(Suppl 1):S84–S85 Cosson M, Rosenthal C, Debodinance P, Berrocal J, Clavé H, Gauld J, Jacquetin B (2010) TVM group: Trans-vaginal mesh technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: 5 years prospective follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 21(Suppl 1):S84–S85
10.
go back to reference Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364:1826–1836PubMedCrossRef Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364:1826–1836PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME (2011) Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 117:242–250PubMedCrossRef Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME (2011) Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 117:242–250PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ek M, Altman D, Gunnarsson J, Falconer C, Tegerstedt G (2012) Clinical efficacy of a trocar-guided mesh kit for repairing lateral defects. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.007/s00192-012-1833-9 Ek M, Altman D, Gunnarsson J, Falconer C, Tegerstedt G (2012) Clinical efficacy of a trocar-guided mesh kit for repairing lateral defects. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.​007/​s00192-012-1833-9
14.
go back to reference Dietz HP (2012) What’s wrong with the debate on mesh surgery? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52:313–315PubMedCrossRef Dietz HP (2012) What’s wrong with the debate on mesh surgery? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52:313–315PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Walters AL, Dacey KT, Zemlyak AY, Lincourt AE, Heniford BT (2012) Medical malpractice and hernia repair: an analysis of case law. J Surg Res [Epub ahead of print] Walters AL, Dacey KT, Zemlyak AY, Lincourt AE, Heniford BT (2012) Medical malpractice and hernia repair: an analysis of case law. J Surg Res [Epub ahead of print]
Metadata
Title
Traditional native tissue vs mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Comment
Author
B. Jacquetin
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1974-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2013 Go to the issue