Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2012

01-09-2012 | Letter to the Editor

Comment on Stanford et al.: Traditional native tissue vs mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature

Authors: Hans Peter Dietz, A. Rane, M. Frazer, Y. Lim

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 9/2012

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stanford EJ, Cassidenti A, Moen MD (2012) Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):19–28PubMedCrossRef Stanford EJ, Cassidenti A, Moen MD (2012) Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):19–28PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dietz HP, Chantarasorn V, Shek KL (2010) Levator avulsion is a risk factor for cystocele recurrence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:76–80PubMedCrossRef Dietz HP, Chantarasorn V, Shek KL (2010) Levator avulsion is a risk factor for cystocele recurrence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:76–80PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wong V, Shek K, Goh J et al (2011) Should mesh be used for cystocele repair? Long-term outcomes of a case-control series. Int Urogynecol J 22:S91CrossRef Wong V, Shek K, Goh J et al (2011) Should mesh be used for cystocele repair? Long-term outcomes of a case-control series. Int Urogynecol J 22:S91CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comment on Stanford et al.: Traditional native tissue vs mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature
Authors
Hans Peter Dietz
A. Rane
M. Frazer
Y. Lim
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1871-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2012

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2012 Go to the issue