Published in:
Open Access
01-05-2011 | Original article
Tissue damage with different surgical techniques in a porcine model of liver resection: implications for living-donor liver transplantation?
Authors:
Armin Dietmar Goralczyk, Aiman Obed, Angelika große Beilage, Burckhardt Sattler, Laszlo Füzesi, Thomas Lorf
Published in:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
|
Issue 3/2011
Login to get access
Abstract
Background/purpose
For living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) it is of paramount importance to preserve as much viable liver tissue as possible to avoid postoperative complications in the donor and recipient. The depth of tissue damage caused by common surgical techniques for liver resection has not been studied so far.
Methods
Here we compared the depth of tissue damage and the immunohistochemical expression of heat shock protein (HSP) 70, a marker for tissue damage, in a porcine model of liver resection, to assess the effect of different surgical techniques, i.e., blunt dissection (BD), and dissection with an ultrasound aspirator (UA), an ultrasound scalpel (US), or a water-jet (WJ).
Results
Analysis with linear mixed effects models (LME) showed significantly less tissue damage with BD and UA than with US and WJ (joint p value <0.001). Damage also increased within 6 h after surgery (p value = 0.004). Semiquantitative evaluation of HSP 70 showed increased expression after resection with US compared to all other resection methods (p value <0.001), indicating increased tissue damage with this method.
Conclusion
We suggest that in cases of liver resection for LDLT surgeons should reevaluate using US and WJ because of possible excessive tissue damage compared to BD and UA. Overall we advocate the use of BD as it requires no special equipment and, hence, has considerably higher cost-effectiveness without compromising tissue preservation and clinical outcome and is readily available even in low-tech environments.