Skip to main content
Top

25-04-2024 | Tibia Fracture | Original Article

Circular frame versus reamed intramedullary tibial nail in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures

Authors: Aatif Mahmood, Krishnakumar Subbaraman, Moheeb Gadullah, David Hawkes, Deepa Bose, Paul Fenton

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures are challenging to treat and controversy exists on whether to treat them with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or a circular frame (CF). This study aims to compare outcomes for intramedullary nail and circular frame in the treatment of open tibial diaphyseal fractures.

Methodology

Retrospective study at a major trauma center of all patients admitted with a grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture between January 2016 and January 2022. The primary outcome measures were major complications: non-union, malunion, refracture, DBI and amputation. Secondary outcome measures were time to union and reoperation rates.

Results

Fifty-five patients were included in the study, 32 patients in CF group and 23 patients in IMN group. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics of patients in both groups. Major complications were recorded in 13 limbs (54%) in IMN group and in 18 limbs (56%) in CF group which were not statistically significant (p = 0.797). Deep bone infection rates were noted in 4 (12.5%) in the CF group, compared to 1 (4%) in IMN group; however, the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.240). Amputation rates as a result of infected non-unions were seen in 1 limb (4%) in IMN group and 2 limbs (6%) in CF group (p = 0.99). Median time to union was significantly shorter in IMN group at 30 weeks compared to 30 weeks for CF group (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

IMN should be the treatment of choice in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture, but CF should be considered for delayed treatment and in patients with bone loss.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Trafton PG (1988) Closed unstable fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 230:58–67CrossRef Trafton PG (1988) Closed unstable fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 230:58–67CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M, McNally MA, Moriarty TF, McFadyen I, Scarborough M, Athanasou NA, Ochsner PE, Kuehl R, Raschke M, Borens O, Xie Z, Velkes S, Hungerer S, Kates SL, Zalavras C, Giannoudis PV, Richards RG, Verhofstad MHJ (2018) Fracture-related infection: a consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury 49(3):505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.040CrossRefPubMed Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M, McNally MA, Moriarty TF, McFadyen I, Scarborough M, Athanasou NA, Ochsner PE, Kuehl R, Raschke M, Borens O, Xie Z, Velkes S, Hungerer S, Kates SL, Zalavras C, Giannoudis PV, Richards RG, Verhofstad MHJ (2018) Fracture-related infection: a consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury 49(3):505–510. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​injury.​2017.​08.​040CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:81–104CrossRef Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:81–104CrossRef
19.
23.
go back to reference Holbrook JL, Swiontkowski MF, Sanders R (1989) Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft: Ender nailing versus external fixation. a randomized prospective comparison. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(8):1231–1238CrossRefPubMed Holbrook JL, Swiontkowski MF, Sanders R (1989) Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft: Ender nailing versus external fixation. a randomized prospective comparison. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(8):1231–1238CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tornetta P 3rd, Bergman M, Watnik N, Berkowitz G, Steuer J (1994) Treatment of grade-IIIb open tibial fractures. a prospective randomised comparison of external fixation and non-reamed locked nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(1):13–19CrossRefPubMed Tornetta P 3rd, Bergman M, Watnik N, Berkowitz G, Steuer J (1994) Treatment of grade-IIIb open tibial fractures. a prospective randomised comparison of external fixation and non-reamed locked nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(1):13–19CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chua W, Murphy D, Siow W, Kagda F, Thambiah J (2012) Epidemiological analysis of outcomes in 323 open tibial diaphyseal fractures: a nine-year experience. Singapore Med J 53(6):385–389PubMed Chua W, Murphy D, Siow W, Kagda F, Thambiah J (2012) Epidemiological analysis of outcomes in 323 open tibial diaphyseal fractures: a nine-year experience. Singapore Med J 53(6):385–389PubMed
Metadata
Title
Circular frame versus reamed intramedullary tibial nail in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures
Authors
Aatif Mahmood
Krishnakumar Subbaraman
Moheeb Gadullah
David Hawkes
Deepa Bose
Paul Fenton
Publication date
25-04-2024
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03946-2