Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

12-03-2024 | Tibia Fracture | Original Article

Outcomes and their predictors in suprapatellar nailing for tibia fractures. Multivariable analysis of 293 consecutive cases

Authors: Jordi Teixidor-Serra, José Vicente Andrés-Peiró, Yaiza García-Sanchez, Jordi Selga-Marsa, María Cristina Garcia-Martínez, Carla Carbonell-Rosell, Enrique García-Albó, Jordi Tomás-Hernández

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures is one of the most common procedures in orthopedic surgery. It can be technically demanding in proximal or distal fractures, which may be facilitated using semi-extended approaches. The aim of this study is to identify outcomes and their predictors using a semi-extended suprapatellar approach for tibial fracture nailing.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort of 293 patients who underwent intramedullary nail fixation of a tibial fracture through a suprapatellar approach, considering a postoperative follow-up of 1 year. Data on patient’s baseline characteristics, injuries, treatments, and outcomes regarding alignment, fracture union, and complications were recorded. For multivariable analysis, hierarchical binary (logistic) regression analysis was performed.

Results

The mean patient age was 47.7 years (SD 18.9), with 42A1 the most frequent fracture pattern (n = 98, 33.5%). Correct or anatomical alignment (≤ 5º in both planes) was achieved in 272 (92.8%) of the patients. On multivariate analysis, surgical delay ≥ 7 days (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.3–8.1) and age over 50 years (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.2–8.3) were found as predictors of fracture malalignment. Fracture healing was achieved in 97.6%, and reoperation rate was 6.14%. Overall complication’s predictors were proximal fracture (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.1–7.2), temporary external fixation (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.2–4.9), and fracture malalignment (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.1–7.9).

Conclusion

The suprapatellar approach is a safe and useful technique for treating tibial fractures, leading to no less than correct reduction in almost all patients and achieving a high fracture healing rate, at very low rates of complications. Pre- and postoperative predictors identified must be taken into account to improve outcomes while treating these fractures.
Literature
1.
Wennergren D, Bergdahl C, Ekelund J, Juto H, Sundfeldt M, Möller M. Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register. Injury. 2018;49:2068–74.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
Tejwani N, Polonet D, Wolinsky PR. Controversies in the intramedullary nailing of proximal and distal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:665–73.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Cinats DJ, Perey B, Moola F, Boyer D, Lemke HM, Stone T, et al. Plate-assisted intramedullary nailing of proximal third tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34:321–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Wysocki RW, Kapotas JS, Virkus WW. Intramedullary nailing of proximal and distal one-third tibial shaft fractures with intraoperative two-pin external fixation. J Trauma. 2009;66:1135–9.PubMed
6.
Sanders RW, DiPasquale TG, Jordan CJ, Arrington JA, Sagi HC. Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:245–55.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Brink O. Suprapatellar nailing of tibial fractures: surgical hints. Curr Orthop Pract. 2016;27:107–12.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Litrenta J, Tornetta P, Mehta S, Jones C, OʼToole RV, Bhandari M, et al. Determination of radiographic healing: an assessment of consistency using RUST and modified RUST in metadiaphyseal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:516–20.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Whelan DB, Bhandari M, Stephen D, Kreder H, McKee MD, Zdero R, et al. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma. 2010;68:629–32.PubMed
12.
13.
Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Chan H, Blachut PA. Long-term follow-up of tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:525–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Maredza M, Petrou S, Dritsaki M, Achten J, Griffin J, Lamb SE, et al. A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of intramedullary nail fixation and locking plate fixation in the treatment of adult patients with an extra-articular fracture of the distal tibia: economic evaluation based on the FixDT trial. Bone Jt J. 2018;100:624–33.CrossRef
15.
Stinner DJ, Mir H. Techniques for intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45:33–45.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Vallier HA. Current evidence: plate versus intramedullary nail for fixation of distal tibia fractures in 2016. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(Suppl 4):S2-6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Behlmer RJ, Whiting PS, Kliethermes SA, Wendt L, Simske NM, Sato EH, et al. Reduction techniques for intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a comparative study. OTA Int Open Access J Orthop Trauma. 2021;4: e095.CrossRef
18.
Natoli RM, Sardesai NR, Richard RD, Sorkin AT, Gaski GE, Virkus WW. Intramedullary nailing of lower-extremity periarticular fractures. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2019;9(e35):1–2.
19.
Wang C, Chen E, Ye C, Pan Z. Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2018;51:133–9.CrossRef
20.
Franke J, Hohendorff B, Alt V, Thormann U, Schnettler R. Suprapatellar nailing of tibial fractures-indications and technique. Injury. 2016;47:495–501.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Metcalf KB, Du JY, Lapite IO, Wetzel RJ, Sontich JK, Dachenhaus ER, et al. Comparison of infrapatellar and suprapatellar approaches for intramedullary nail fixation of tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2021;35:e45-50.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Jones M, Parry M, Whitehouse M, Mitchell S. Radiologic outcome and patient-reported function after intramedullary nailing: a comparison of the retropatellar and infrapatellar approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:256–62.CrossRefPubMed
23.
De Giacomo AF, Tornetta P. Alignment after intramedullary nailing of distal tibia fractures without fibula fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:561–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Avilucea FR, Triantafillou K, Whiting PS, Perez EA, Mir HR. Suprapatellar intramedullary nail technique lowers rate of malalignment of distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:557–60.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Kulkarni MS, Tummala M, Aroor MN, Vijayan S, Rao SK. Suprapatellar nailing in proximal third tibial fractures - clinicoradiological outcome. Injury. 2020;51:1879–86.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Vidyadhara S, Sharath KR. Prospective study of the clinico-radiological outcome of interlocked nailing in proximal third tibial shaft fractures. Injury. 2006;37:536–42.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Auston DA, Meiss J, Serrano R, Sellers T, Carlson G, Hoggard T, et al. Percutaneous or open reduction of closed tibial shaft fractures during intramedullary nailing does not increase wound complications, infection or nonunion rates. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31:215–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Nork SE, Barei DP, Schildhauer TA, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, et al. Intramedullary nailing of proximal quarter tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:523–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Sanders DW, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta P, et al. Prognostic factors for predicting outcomes after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1786–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
31.
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Tong D, Adili A, Shaughnessy SG. Reamed versus nonreamed intramedullary nailing of lower extremity long bone fractures: a systematic overview and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:2–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Duan X, Al-Qwbani M, Zeng Y, Zhang W, Xiang Z. Intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD008241.PubMed
33.
Bhandari M, Tornetta P, Sprague S, Najibi S, Petrisor B, Griffith L, et al. Predictors of reoperation following operative management of fractures of the tibial shaft. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:353–61.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Milner SA, Davis TRC, Muir KR, Greenwood DC, Doherty M. Long-term outcome after tibial shaft fracture: is malunion important? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:971–80.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Mitchell PM, Weisenthal BM, Collinge CA. No incidence of postoperative knee sepsis with suprapatellar nailing of open tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31:85–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Marecek GS, Nicholson LT, Broghammer FH, Talerico M, Tougas C, Donegan DJ, et al. Risk of knee sepsis after treatment of open tibia fractures: a multicenter comparison of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32:88–92.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Courtney PM, Boniello A, Donegan D, Ahn J, Mehta S. Functional knee outcomes in infrapatellar and suprapatellar tibial nailing: does approach matter? Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ. 2015;44:E513-516.PubMed
38.
Toivanen JAK, Väistö O, Kannus P, Latvala K, Honkonen SE, Järvinen MJ. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:580–5.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Isaac M, OʼToole RV, Udogwu U, Connelly D, Baker M, Lebrun CT, et al. Incidence of knee pain beyond 1 year: suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach for intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:438–42.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Metadata
Title
Outcomes and their predictors in suprapatellar nailing for tibia fractures. Multivariable analysis of 293 consecutive cases
Authors
Jordi Teixidor-Serra
José Vicente Andrés-Peiró
Yaiza García-Sanchez
Jordi Selga-Marsa
María Cristina Garcia-Martínez
Carla Carbonell-Rosell
Enrique García-Albó
Jordi Tomás-Hernández
Publication date
12-03-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02476-0