Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Head & Face Medicine 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

The validity of three neo-classical facial canons in young adults originating from the Arabian Peninsula

Author: Maisa O Al-Sebaei

Published in: Head & Face Medicine | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Understanding facial harmony and proportions is essential for facial reconstructive procedures and orthognathic surgery planning. In the literature, the neoclassical facial canons have been revisited in populations including North American whites and African Americans. The purpose of this study was to establish a baseline for selected facial anthropometric measurements and test the validity of 3 neoclassical facial canons in a cohort of young Saudi adults originating from the Arabian Peninsula.

Methods

The study group consisted of 168 healthy, esthetically pleasing Saudi Arabian dental students originating from the Arabian Peninsula (93 males and 75 females, age 20–24 years). Using a caliper, three neoclassical facial canons were measured; the vertical thirds of the face, the orbital canon (intercanthal distance = eye fissure length), and the orbito-nasal canon (intercanthal distance = nasal width) and analyzed using Student’s t-test, general linear modeling, and pairwise comparison of means.

Results

The upper, middle, and lower thirds were not equal in measurement to each other (p < 0.0001). Sex dimorphism was observed in the lower facial third and nasal width measurements, with both larger in men (both p < 0.0001). The majority of subjects had longer upper and lower thirds than middle thirds, with 91.4% of males and 88% of females demonstrating a larger lower third than middle third. The most frequent variation in the orbital canon was a wider intercanthal distance than eye fissure length (55.9% of males and 74.7% of females). The most frequent variation in the orbito-nasal canon was a wider nasal width than intercanthal distance (92% of males and 56% of females).

Conclusions

Although these individuals are esthetically pleasing, they do not exhibit equal facial thirds or conform to orbital or orbito-nasal canons. The three neoclassical canons studied could not be validated in young adults originating from the Arabian Peninsula. Thus, the esthetic goals in reconstructive and orthognathic surgery should respect this ethnic variation.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Vegter F, Hage JJ. Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1090–6.CrossRefPubMed Vegter F, Hage JJ. Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1090–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Prokopakis EP, Vlastos IM, Picavet VA, Nolst Trenite G, Thomas R, Cingi C, et al. The golden ratio in facial symmetry. Rhinology. 2013;51:18–21.PubMed Prokopakis EP, Vlastos IM, Picavet VA, Nolst Trenite G, Thomas R, Cingi C, et al. The golden ratio in facial symmetry. Rhinology. 2013;51:18–21.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Seghers M, Longacre J, Destefano G. The golden proportion and beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1964;34:382–6.CrossRef Seghers M, Longacre J, Destefano G. The golden proportion and beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1964;34:382–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mizumoto Y, Deguchi Sr T, Fong KW. Assessment of facial golden proportions among young Japanese women. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:168–74.CrossRefPubMed Mizumoto Y, Deguchi Sr T, Fong KW. Assessment of facial golden proportions among young Japanese women. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:168–74.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pini NP, de-Marchi LM, Gribel BF, Ubaldini AL, Pascotto RC. Analysis of the golden proportion and width/height ratios of maxillary anterior dentition in patients with lateral incisor agenesis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24:402–14.CrossRefPubMed Pini NP, de-Marchi LM, Gribel BF, Ubaldini AL, Pascotto RC. Analysis of the golden proportion and width/height ratios of maxillary anterior dentition in patients with lateral incisor agenesis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24:402–14.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sunilkumar LN, Jadhav KS, Nazirkar G, Singh S, Nagmode PS, Ali FM. Assessment of Facial Golden Proportions among North Maharashtri-an Population. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5:48–54.PubMedPubMedCentral Sunilkumar LN, Jadhav KS, Nazirkar G, Singh S, Nagmode PS, Ali FM. Assessment of Facial Golden Proportions among North Maharashtri-an Population. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5:48–54.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Zlataric DK, Kristek E, Celebic A. Analysis of width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition: correlation between dental proportions and facial measurements. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:313–5.PubMed Zlataric DK, Kristek E, Celebic A. Analysis of width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition: correlation between dental proportions and facial measurements. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:313–5.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75:328–38.CrossRefPubMed Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75:328–38.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2000;24:179–84.CrossRef Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2000;24:179–84.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ricketts RM. Divine proportion in facial esthetics. Clin Plast Surg. 1982;9:401–22.PubMed Ricketts RM. Divine proportion in facial esthetics. Clin Plast Surg. 1982;9:401–22.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Farkas LG, Hajnis K, Posnick JC. Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30:1–12.CrossRefPubMed Farkas LG, Hajnis K, Posnick JC. Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30:1–12.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Farkas LG, James JS. Anthropometry of the face in lateral facial dysplasia: the unilateral form. Cleft Palate J. 1977;14:193–9.PubMed Farkas LG, James JS. Anthropometry of the face in lateral facial dysplasia: the unilateral form. Cleft Palate J. 1977;14:193–9.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR. Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:692–8.CrossRefPubMed Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR. Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:692–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR, Alt KW, Bagic I, Baltadjiev G, et al. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16:615–46.CrossRefPubMed Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR, Alt KW, Bagic I, Baltadjiev G, et al. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16:615–46.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2007.
18.
go back to reference Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: 1. Concepts Canons Dent Update. 2008;35:102–4.PubMed Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: 1. Concepts Canons Dent Update. 2008;35:102–4.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1994. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1994.
20.
go back to reference Wang D, Qian G, Zhang M, Farkas LG. Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1997;21:265–9.CrossRef Wang D, Qian G, Zhang M, Farkas LG. Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1997;21:265–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Borman H, Ozgur F, Gursu G. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults. Ann Plas Surg. 1999;42:280–8.CrossRef Borman H, Ozgur F, Gursu G. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults. Ann Plas Surg. 1999;42:280–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Al-Qattan MM, Alsaeed AA, Al-Madani OK, Al-Amri NA, Al-Dahian NA. Anthropometry of the Saudi Arabian nose. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:821–4.CrossRefPubMed Al-Qattan MM, Alsaeed AA, Al-Madani OK, Al-Amri NA, Al-Dahian NA. Anthropometry of the Saudi Arabian nose. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:821–4.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Dharap AS A, Fadel R, Osman M, Chakravarty M, Abdul Latif N, Abu-Hijlrh M. Facial anthropometry in Arab population. Bahrain Medical Bulletin. 2013;35:69–77.CrossRef Dharap AS A, Fadel R, Osman M, Chakravarty M, Abdul Latif N, Abu-Hijlrh M. Facial anthropometry in Arab population. Bahrain Medical Bulletin. 2013;35:69–77.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The validity of three neo-classical facial canons in young adults originating from the Arabian Peninsula
Author
Maisa O Al-Sebaei
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Head & Face Medicine / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1746-160X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0064-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Head & Face Medicine 1/2015 Go to the issue