Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Original Paper

The use of fibre-based demineralised bone matrix in major acetabular reconstruction: surgical technique and preliminary results

Authors: Moussa Hamadouche, Mathieu Karoubi, Valérie Dumaine, Jean Pierre Courpied

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Acetabular osteolysis associated with socket loosening is one of the main long-term complications of total hip arthroplasty. In case of major bone loss, where <50% host bone coverage can be obtained with a porous-coated cementless cup, it is generally agreed that a metal ring or cage in association with a cemented component and allograft bone should be used. In order to promote allograft bone consolidation and incorporation, we have associated demineralised bone matrix (DBM, Grafton® A Flex) to the construct ion. Here we describe the technical details of major acetabular reconstruction using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with allograft bone and DBM. This device has a hook that must be placed under the teardrop of the acetabulum and a plate for iliac fixation. The main advantages of this device are help in restoring the normal centre of hip rotation, guiding the reconstruction and partially unloading the graft. The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device has provided a 92% survival rate free of loosening at 13-year follow-up in a consecutive series of 60 type III and IV deficiencies. Our preliminary results using DBM indicate faster allograft consolidation and remodelling.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Comba F, Buttaro M, Pusso R, Piccaluga F (2009) Acetabular revision surgery with impacted bone allografts and cemented cups in patients younger than 55 years. Int Orthop 33:611–616CrossRefPubMed Comba F, Buttaro M, Pusso R, Piccaluga F (2009) Acetabular revision surgery with impacted bone allografts and cemented cups in patients younger than 55 years. Int Orthop 33:611–616CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sun C, Lian YY, Jin YH, Zhao CB, Pan SQ, Liu XF (2009) Clinical and radiographic assessment of cementless acetabular revision with morsellised allografts. Int Orthop 33:1525–1530CrossRefPubMed Sun C, Lian YY, Jin YH, Zhao CB, Pan SQ, Liu XF (2009) Clinical and radiographic assessment of cementless acetabular revision with morsellised allografts. Int Orthop 33:1525–1530CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Vargas B, Caton J (2009) Acetabular revision with freeze-dried irradiated and chemically treated allograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up of 17 cases. Int Orthop 33:35–39CrossRefPubMed Vargas B, Caton J (2009) Acetabular revision with freeze-dried irradiated and chemically treated allograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up of 17 cases. Int Orthop 33:35–39CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44CrossRefPubMed Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, Bargar WL, Bierbaum BF, Boettcher WG, Steinberg ME, Stulberg SD, Wedge JH (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 243:126–137PubMed D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, Bargar WL, Bierbaum BF, Boettcher WG, Steinberg ME, Stulberg SD, Wedge JH (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 243:126–137PubMed
6.
go back to reference Cabanela ME (1998) Reconstruction rings and bone graft in total hip revision surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 29:255–262CrossRefPubMed Cabanela ME (1998) Reconstruction rings and bone graft in total hip revision surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 29:255–262CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kerboull M (1985) Revision surgery for aseptic loosening of total hip replacement. In: Postel M, Kerboull M, Evrard J, Courpied JP (eds) Acetabular reconstruction, Total hip replacement. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 85–90 Kerboull M (1985) Revision surgery for aseptic loosening of total hip replacement. In: Postel M, Kerboull M, Evrard J, Courpied JP (eds) Acetabular reconstruction, Total hip replacement. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 85–90
8.
go back to reference Koch P, Tannast M, Fujita H, Siebenrock K, Ganz R (2008) Minimum ten year results of total hip arthroplasty with the acetabular reinforcement ring in avascular osteonecrosis. Int Orthop 32:173–179CrossRefPubMed Koch P, Tannast M, Fujita H, Siebenrock K, Ganz R (2008) Minimum ten year results of total hip arthroplasty with the acetabular reinforcement ring in avascular osteonecrosis. Int Orthop 32:173–179CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Berry DJ, Muller ME (1992) Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:711–715PubMed Berry DJ, Muller ME (1992) Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:711–715PubMed
10.
go back to reference Baba T, Shitoto K (2010) Revision of total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull and KT plates. Int Orthop 34:341–347CrossRefPubMed Baba T, Shitoto K (2010) Revision of total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull and KT plates. Int Orthop 34:341–347CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kawai T, Tanaka C, Ikenaga M, Kanoe H, Okudaira S (2010) Total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis. J Arthroplasty 25:432–436CrossRefPubMed Kawai T, Tanaka C, Ikenaga M, Kanoe H, Okudaira S (2010) Total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis. J Arthroplasty 25:432–436CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Onishi E, Nakamura T (2007) Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:26–31PubMed Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Onishi E, Nakamura T (2007) Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:26–31PubMed
13.
go back to reference Okano K, Miyata N, Enomoto H, Osaki M, Shindo H (2010) Revision with impacted bone allografts and the Kerboull cross plate for massive bone defect of the acetabulum. J Arthroplasty 25:594–599CrossRefPubMed Okano K, Miyata N, Enomoto H, Osaki M, Shindo H (2010) Revision with impacted bone allografts and the Kerboull cross plate for massive bone defect of the acetabulum. J Arthroplasty 25:594–599CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tanaka C, Shikata J, Ikenaga M, Takahashi M (2003) Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and hydroxyapatite granules: a 3- to 8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 18:719–725CrossRefPubMed Tanaka C, Shikata J, Ikenaga M, Takahashi M (2003) Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and hydroxyapatite granules: a 3- to 8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 18:719–725CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lunn J, Kearns SS, Quinlan W, Murray P, Byrne O (2005) J Impaction allografting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device. 35 hips followed for 3-7 years. Acta Orthopedica 76:298–302 Lunn J, Kearns SS, Quinlan W, Murray P, Byrne O (2005) J Impaction allografting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device. 35 hips followed for 3-7 years. Acta Orthopedica 76:298–302
16.
go back to reference Urist M, Silverman BF, Buring K, Dubuc FL, Rosenberg JM (1967) The bone induction principle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 53:243–283CrossRefPubMed Urist M, Silverman BF, Buring K, Dubuc FL, Rosenberg JM (1967) The bone induction principle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 53:243–283CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cammisa FP, Lowery G, Garfin SR, Geisler FH, Klara PM, McGuire RA, Sassard WR, Stubbs H, Block JE (2004) Two-year fusion rate equivalency between Grafton DBM gel and autograft in posterolateral spine fusion: a prospective controlled trial employing a side-by-side comparison in the same patient. Spine 29:660–666CrossRefPubMed Cammisa FP, Lowery G, Garfin SR, Geisler FH, Klara PM, McGuire RA, Sassard WR, Stubbs H, Block JE (2004) Two-year fusion rate equivalency between Grafton DBM gel and autograft in posterolateral spine fusion: a prospective controlled trial employing a side-by-side comparison in the same patient. Spine 29:660–666CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Khan SN, Fraser JF, Sandhu HS, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Lane JM (2005) Use of osteopromotive growth factors, demineralized bone matrix, and ceramics to enhance spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:129–137PubMed Khan SN, Fraser JF, Sandhu HS, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Lane JM (2005) Use of osteopromotive growth factors, demineralized bone matrix, and ceramics to enhance spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:129–137PubMed
19.
go back to reference Louis-Ugbo J, Murakami H, Kim HS, Minamide A, Boden SD (2004) Evidence of osteoinduction by Grafton demineralized bone matrix in nonhuman primate spinal fusion. Spine 29:360–366CrossRefPubMed Louis-Ugbo J, Murakami H, Kim HS, Minamide A, Boden SD (2004) Evidence of osteoinduction by Grafton demineralized bone matrix in nonhuman primate spinal fusion. Spine 29:360–366CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Martin GJ, Boden SD, Titus L, Scarborough NL (1999) New formulations of demineralized bone matrix as a more effective graft alternative in experimental posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. Spine 24:637–645CrossRefPubMed Martin GJ, Boden SD, Titus L, Scarborough NL (1999) New formulations of demineralized bone matrix as a more effective graft alternative in experimental posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. Spine 24:637–645CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Peterson B, Whang PG, Iglesias R, Wang JC, Lieberman JR (2004) Osteoinductivity of commercially available demineralized bone matrix. Preparations in a spine fusion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2243–2250PubMed Peterson B, Whang PG, Iglesias R, Wang JC, Lieberman JR (2004) Osteoinductivity of commercially available demineralized bone matrix. Preparations in a spine fusion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2243–2250PubMed
22.
go back to reference Hierholzer C, Sama D, Toro JB, Peterson M, Helfet DL (2006) Plate fixation of ununited humeral shaft fractures: effect of type of bone graft on healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1442–1447CrossRefPubMed Hierholzer C, Sama D, Toro JB, Peterson M, Helfet DL (2006) Plate fixation of ununited humeral shaft fractures: effect of type of bone graft on healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1442–1447CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Delp SL, Wixson RL, Komattu AV, Kocmond JH (1996) How superior placement of the joint center in hip arthroplasty affects the abductor muscles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 328:137–146CrossRefPubMed Delp SL, Wixson RL, Komattu AV, Kocmond JH (1996) How superior placement of the joint center in hip arthroplasty affects the abductor muscles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 328:137–146CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crowninshield RD (1979) Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:639–652PubMed Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crowninshield RD (1979) Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:639–652PubMed
25.
go back to reference Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, O’Gorman TW (1988) Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:79–87PubMed Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, O’Gorman TW (1988) Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:79–87PubMed
26.
go back to reference Doehring TC, Rubash HE, Shelley FJ, Schwendeman LJ, Donaldson TK, Navalgund YA (1996) Effect of superior and superolateral relocations of the hip center on hip joint forces. An experimental and analytical analysis. J Arthroplasty 11:693–703CrossRefPubMed Doehring TC, Rubash HE, Shelley FJ, Schwendeman LJ, Donaldson TK, Navalgund YA (1996) Effect of superior and superolateral relocations of the hip center on hip joint forces. An experimental and analytical analysis. J Arthroplasty 11:693–703CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ (1998) Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 13:530–534CrossRefPubMed Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ (1998) Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 13:530–534CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Schmalzried TP, Guttmann D, Grecula M, Amstutz HC (1994) The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:677–688PubMed Schmalzried TP, Guttmann D, Grecula M, Amstutz HC (1994) The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:677–688PubMed
29.
go back to reference Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Won YY, Longjohn D, Wan Z (2001) Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty 16:961–969CrossRefPubMed Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Won YY, Longjohn D, Wan Z (2001) Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty 16:961–969CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboul L (2000) The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 378:155–168CrossRefPubMed Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboul L (2000) The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 378:155–168CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The use of fibre-based demineralised bone matrix in major acetabular reconstruction: surgical technique and preliminary results
Authors
Moussa Hamadouche
Mathieu Karoubi
Valérie Dumaine
Jean Pierre Courpied
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1145-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

International Orthopaedics 2/2011 Go to the issue