Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Orthopaedics
Published in: International Orthopaedics 6/2009

01-12-2009 | Original Paper

Clinical and radiographic assessment of cementless acetabular revision with morsellised allografts

Authors: Chuang Sun, Yong-Yun Lian, Yu-Hua Jin, Cheng-Bin Zhao, Shi-Qi Pan, Xue-Feng Liu

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of cementless acetabular revision with deep frozen morsellised allografts. Sixty-one patients (65 hips) underwent acetabular revision using cementless components and deep frozen morsellised allografts. Fifty-seven hips (53 patients) were reviewed at a mean of 105.1 months (range 72–180 months) after revision. The study group included 29 males and 24 females with a mean age of 46.4 years. One cup underwent further revision for aseptic loosening and two were defined as radiographic failures. The mean time for allograft incorporation was 12.5 months (range 6–24 months) after index surgery. The mean Harris hip score of the patients improved from 61.1 points preoperatively to 91.6 points postoperatively. Linear and cavitary osteolysis was observed in two and 12 hips, respectively. The acetabular revision using cementless components with deep frozen morsellized allografts provides favourable clinical and radiographic results, although the initial disease and age may adversely affect the outcomes.
Literature
1.
Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM et al (1985) Results of revision of mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982: a two to five year followup. J Bone Joint Surg AM 67:1074–1085PubMed
2.
Marti RK, Schuller HM, Besselaar PP et al (1990) Results of revision of hip arthroplasty with cement: a five to fourteen-year followup study. J Bone Joint Surg AM 72:346–354PubMed
3.
Hungerford DS, Jones LC (1988) The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:12–24PubMed
4.
Etienne G, Bezwada HP, Hungerford DS et al (2004) The incorporation of morselized bone grafts in cementless acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:241–246CrossRefPubMed
5.
Lie SA, Havelin LI, Furnes ON et al (2004) Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:504–509PubMed
6.
Dearborn JT, Harris WH (2000) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 15:8–15CrossRefPubMed
7.
Shinar AA, Harris WH (1997) Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:159–168PubMed
8.
Dearborn JT, Harris WH (2000) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 15:8–15CrossRefPubMed
9.
D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS et al (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 243:126–137PubMed
10.
Fan CY, Chen WM, Lee OK et al (2008) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups: an experience in Asia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Aug 128(8):809–813CrossRef
11.
Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B (1990) Effect of femoral head size on wear of polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:518–528PubMed
12.
Wilson MG, Nikpoor N, Alibadi P et al (1989) The fate of acetabular allografts after bipolar revision arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1469–1479PubMed
13.
Conn RA, Paterson LFA, Stauffer RN et al (1985) Management of acetabular deficiency: long-term results of bone grafting the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Trans 9:451–452
14.
Moskal JT, Higgins ME, Shen J (2008) Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(3):691–695CrossRefPubMed
15.
Civinini R, Capone A, Carulli C et al (2008) Acetabular revisions using a cementless oblong cup: five to ten year results. Int Orthop 32(2):189–193CrossRefPubMed
16.
Arts JJ, Verdonschot N, Buma P et al (2006) Larger bone graft size and washing of bone grafts prior to impaction enhance the initial stability of cemented cups: experiments using a synthetic acetabular model. Acta Orthop 77:227–233CrossRefPubMed
17.
Palm L, Jacobsson SA, Kvist J et al (2007) Acetabular revision with extensive allograft impaction and uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated implants. Results after 9 (7–11) years follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22(8):1083–1091CrossRefPubMed
18.
Oakley J, Kuiper JH (2006) Factors affecting the cohesion of impaction bone graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:828–831CrossRefPubMed
19.
Dunlop DG, Brewster NT, Madabhushi SP et al (2003) Techniques to improve the shear strength of impacted bone graft: the effect of particle size and washing of the graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:639–646PubMed
20.
Ullmark G (2000) Bigger size and defatting of bone chips will increase cup stability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:445–447CrossRefPubMed
21.
Van der Donk S, Weernink T, Buma P et al (2003) Rinsing morselized allografts improves bone and tissue ingrowth. Clin Orthop Relat Res 408:302–310CrossRefPubMed
22.
Sorensen J, Ullmark G, Langstrom B et al (2003) Rapid bone and blood flow formation in impacted morselized allografts: positron emission tomography (PET) studies on allografts in 5 femoral component revisions of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 74:633–643CrossRefPubMed
23.
Ullmark G, Obrant KJ (2002) Histology of impacted bone-graft incorporation. J Arthroplasty 17:150–157CrossRefPubMed
24.
Paulsen A, Pedersen AB, Johnsen SP et al (2007) Effect of hydroxyapatite coating on risk of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty in younger patients: findings from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop Oct 78(5):622–628CrossRef
25.
Zhu YH, Chiu KY, Tang WM (2001) Polyethylene wear and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sur 9:91–99
Metadata
Title
Clinical and radiographic assessment of cementless acetabular revision with morsellised allografts
Authors
Chuang Sun
Yong-Yun Lian
Yu-Hua Jin
Cheng-Bin Zhao
Shi-Qi Pan
Xue-Feng Liu
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0722-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

International Orthopaedics 6/2009 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Is MIPO in humeral shaft fractures really safe? Postoperative ultrasonographic evaluation

Original Paper

Leg lengthening by distraction osteogenesis using the Ilizarov apparatus: a novel concept of tibia callus subsidence and its influencing factors

Original Paper

Triple pelvic osteotomy as treatment for osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip

Original Paper

Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up?

Original Paper

Rotational acetabular osteotomy for advanced osteoarthritis of the hip joint with acetabular dysplasia

Original Paper

Mid-term results using a cementless hip prosthesis in young Chinese patients: a five- to seven-year follow-up study