Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Oral Health
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

The use of autogenous tooth bone graft is an efficient method of alveolar ridge preservation – meta-analysis and systematic review

Authors: Eleonora Solyom, Eszter Szalai, Márk László Czumbel, Bence Szabo, Szilárd Váncsa, Krisztina Mikulas, Zsombor Radoczy-Drajko, Gabor Varga, Péter Hegyi, Balint Molnar, Reka Fazekas

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ridge resorption following tooth extraction may be reduced by alveolar ridge preservation (ARP). Previous randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews have suggested that autogenous tooth bone graft (ATB) can be an effective alternative material for ARP. However, the results are heterogeneous. Therefore, our research aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ATB in ARP.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE and Scopus for studies published from inception to 31 November 2021. We searched searched for randomized, non-randomized controlled trials and case series reporting on ATB use for ARP. The primary outcome was the ridge width difference pre- and post-surgery, measured in millimetres (mm) measured on CBCT (cone beam computed tomography). The secondary outcomes were the histological results. We followed the PRISMA2020 recommendations for reporting our systematic review and meta-analysis.

Results

The analysis included eight studies for the primary and six for the secondary outcomes. The meta-analysis revealed a positive ridge preservation effect with a pooled mean difference ridge width change of -0.72 mm. The pooled mean residual graft proportion was 11.61%, and the newly formed bone proportion was 40.23%. The pooled mean of newly formed bone proportion was higher in the group where ATB originated from both the root and crown of the tooth.

Conclusions

ATB is an effective particulate graft material in ARP. Complete demineralization of the ATB tends to decrease the proportion of newly formed bone. ATB can be an attractive option for ARP.

Trial registration

The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021287890).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Van der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(12):1048–58.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Araujo M, Linder E, Lindhe J. Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: an experimental study in dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(1):1–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Pietrokovski J, Sorin S, Hirschfeld Z. The residual ridge in partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;36(2):150–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23(4):313–23.PubMed
6.
Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Weinlaender M, Vasilic N, Aleksic Z, Kenney EB. Effectiveness of a combination of platelet-rich plasma, bovine porous bone mineral and guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of mandibular grade II molar furcations in humans. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(8):746–51.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Caplanis N, Lozada JL, Kan JY. Extraction defect assessment, classification, and management. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005;33(11):853–63.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Elian N, Cho SC, Froum S, Smith RB, Tarnow DP. A simplified socket classification and repair technique. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2007;19(2):99–104. quiz 106.PubMed
9.
Adams RJ. Is there clinical evidence to support alveolar ridge preservation over extraction alone? A review of recent literature and case reports of late graft failure. Br Dent J. 2022;233(6):469–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NHM, Payne AGT, Duncan W, Faggion CM, Esposito M. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;2015(5):CD010176.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, Scheetz JP. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol. 2003;74(7):990–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
MacBeth N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Donos N, Mardas N. Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2017;28(8):982–1004.CrossRef
13.
Nampo T, Watahiki J, Enomoto A, Taguchi T, Ono M, Nakano H, Yamamoto G, Irie T, Tachikawa T, Maki K. A new method for alveolar bone repair using extracted teeth for the graft material. J Periodontol. 2010;81(9):1264–72.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Nasr HF, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Yukna RA. Bone and bone substitutes. Periodontol. 2000;1999(19):74–86.
15.
Araujo MG, Linder E, Lindhe J. Bio-Oss collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Canellas J, Soares BN, Ritto FG, Vettore MV, Vidigal Júnior GM, Fischer RG, Medeiros PJD. What grafting materials produce greater alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021;49(11):1064–71.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Yeomans JD, Urist MR. Bone induction by decalcified dentine implanted into oral, osseous and muscle tissues. Arch Oral Biol. 1967;12(8):999–1008.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Catanzaro-Guimaraes SA, Catanzaro Guimaraes BP, Garcia RB, Alle N. Osteogenic potential of autogenic demineralized dentin implanted in bony defects in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15(2):160–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Gomes MF, dos Anjos MJ, Nogueira TO, Guimaraes SA. Histologic evaluation of the osteoinductive property of autogenous demineralized dentin matrix on surgical bone defects in rabbit skulls using human amniotic membrane for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(4):563–71.PubMed
20.
Kim YK, Kim SG, Oh JS, Jin SC, Son JS, Kim SY, Lim SY. Analysis of the inorganic component of autogenous tooth bone graft material. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2011;11(8):7442–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, Kim SY. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(4):496–503.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Melek LN, El Said MM. Evaluation of “Autogenous Bioengineered Injectable PRF – Tooth graft” combination (ABIT) in reconstruction of maxillary alveolar ridge defects: CBCT volumetric analysis. Saudi J Dent Res. 2017;8(1):86–96.CrossRef
23.
Kim TW, Seo EW, Song SI. Open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fracture in an 11-month-old infant: a case report. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;39(2):90–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Wood RA, Mealey BL. Histologic comparison of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. J Periodontol. 2012;83(3):329–36.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Kim YK, Pang KM, Yun PY, Leem DH, Um IW. Long-term follow-up of autogenous tooth bone graft blocks with dental implants. Clin Case Rep. 2017;5(2):108–18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lindhe J. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. Surface topography of titanium dental implants. 2003. p. 821–8.
27.
Cenicante J, Botelho J, Machado V, Mendes JJ, Mascarenhas P, Alcoforado G, Santos A. The use of autogenous teeth for alveolar ridge preservation: a literature review. Appl Sci. 2021;11(4):1853.CrossRef
28.
Minetti E, Taschieri S, Corbella S. Autologous deciduous tooth-derived material for alveolar ridge preservation: a clinical and histological case report. Case Rep Dent. 2020;2020:2936878.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Santos A, Botelho J, Machado V, Borrecho G, Proença L, Mendes JJ, Mascarenhas P, Alcoforado G. Autogenous mineralized dentin versus xenograft granules in ridge preservation for delayed implantation in post-extraction sites: a randomized controlled clinical trial with an 18 months follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(8):905–15.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Gual-Vaqués P, Polis-Yanes C, Estrugo-Devesa A, Ayuso-Montero R, Mari-Roig A, López-López J. Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018;23(1):e112–9.PubMed
31.
Tabatabaei FS, Tatari S, Samadi R, Moharamzadeh K. Different methods of dentin processing for application in bone tissue engineering: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(10):2616–27.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Kirmayr M, Quilodrán C, Valente B, Loezar C, Garegnani L, Franco JVA. The GRADE approach, part 1: how to assess the certainty of the evidence. Medwave. 2021;21(2):e8109.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from www.​training.​cochrane.​org/​handbook.
34.
Um I-W, Kim Y-K, Park J-C, Lee J-H. Clinical application of autogenous demineralized dentin matrix loaded with recombinant human bone morphogenetic-2 for socket preservation: A case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(1):4–10.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Joshi CP, Dani NH, Khedkar SU. Alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous tooth graft versus beta-tricalcium phosphate alloplast: a randomized, controlled, prospective, clinical pilot study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016;20(4):429–34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Dwivedi A, Kour M. A neoteric procedure for alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous fresh mineralized tooth graft prepared at chair side. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10(4):535–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Radoczy-Drajko Z, Windisch P, Svidro E, Tajti P, Molnar B, Gerber G. Clinical, radiographical and histological evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation with an autogenous tooth derived particulate graft in EDS class 3–4 defects. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Elfana A, El-Kholy S, Saleh HA, Fawzy El-Sayed K. Alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous whole-tooth versus demineralized dentin grafts: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(5):539–48.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Jung GU, Jeon TH, Kang MH, Um IW, Song IS, Ryu JJ, Jun SH. Volumetric, radiographic, and histologic analyses of demineralized dentin matrix combined with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for ridge preservation: a prospective randomized controlled trial in comparison with xenograft. Appl Sci. 2018;8(8).
40.
Pang KM, Um IW, Kim YK, Woo JM, Kim SM, Lee JH. Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: a prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(7):809–15.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Ali S, Faggion CMJ, Esposito M. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;4(4):Cd010176.PubMed
42.
Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93(10):950–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Qin X, Raj RM, Liao XF, Shi W, Ma B, Gong SQ, Chen WM, Zhou B. Using rigidly fixed autogenous tooth graft to repair bone defect: an animal model. Dent Traumatol. 2014;30(5):380–4.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Mahardawi B, Rochanavibhata S, Jiaranuchart S, Arunjaroensuk S, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A. Autogenous tooth bone graft material prepared chairside and its clinical applications: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;52:132.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Ramanauskaite A, Obreja K, Sader R, Khoury F, Romanos G, Koo KT, Keeve PL, Sculean A, Schwarz F. Surgical treatment of periimplantitis with augmentative techniques. Implant Dent. 2019;28(2):187–209.PubMedCrossRef
46.
De Risi V, Clementini M, Vittorini G, Mannocci A, De Sanctis M. Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(1):50–68.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Koga T, Minamizato T, Kawai Y, Miura K, I T, Nakatani Y, Sumita Y, Asahina I. Bone regeneration using dentin matrix depends on the degree of demineralization and particle size. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147235.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Jeong HR, Hwang JH, Lee JK. Effectiveness of autogenous tooth bone used as a graft material for regeneration of bone in miniature pig. jkaoms. 2011;37(5):375–9.CrossRef
49.
Kim YK, Kim SG, Yun PY, Yeo IS, Jin SC, Oh JS, Kim HJ, Yu SK, Lee SY, Kim JS, et al. Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: a comparison with traditional grafting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117(1):e39-45.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Lee JY, Kim YK, Yi YJ, Choi JH. Clinical evaluation of ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth bone graft material: case series study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;39(4):156–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Minetti E, Palermo A, Ferrante F, Schmitz JH, Lung Ho HK, Dih Hann SN, Giacometti E, Gambardella U, Contessi M, Celko M, et al. Autologous tooth graft after endodontical treated used for socket preservation: a multicenter clinical study. Appl Sci. 2019;9(24):5396.CrossRef
52.
Del Canto-Díaz A, de Elío-Oliveros J, Del Canto-Díaz M, Alobera-Gracia MA, Del Canto-Pingarrón M, Martínez-González JM. Use of autologous tooth-derived graft material in the post-extraction dental socket. Pilot study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24(1):e53-60.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The use of autogenous tooth bone graft is an efficient method of alveolar ridge preservation – meta-analysis and systematic review
Authors
Eleonora Solyom
Eszter Szalai
Márk László Czumbel
Bence Szabo
Szilárd Váncsa
Krisztina Mikulas
Zsombor Radoczy-Drajko
Gabor Varga
Péter Hegyi
Balint Molnar
Reka Fazekas
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02930-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue

Research

Effects of different designs of orthodontic clear aligners on the maxillary central incisors in the tooth extraction cases: a biomechanical study

Research

Measuring tooth size discrepancies using Bolton analysis: a comparative cross-sectional study among major ethnicity in Malaysia

Research

Clinical feasibility evaluation of a digital workflow of prosthetically oriented onlay bone grafting for horizontal alveolar augmentation: a prospective pilot study

Research

Can locally applied risedronate be an effective agent when combined with xenografts? An animal study

Research

Correlation between salivary cytokine profiles and white spot lesions in adolescent patients receiving clear aligner orthodontic treatment

Research

Prevalence of dental caries and relation with nutritional status among school-age children in resource limited setting of southern Ethiopia