Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Original Article

The use of a head-mounted display in oral implantology: a feasibility study

Authors: Balázs Vigh, Steffen Müller, Oliver Ristow, Herbert Deppe, Stuart Holdstock, Jürgen den Hollander, Nassir Navab, Timm Steiner, Bettina Hohlweg-Majert

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the accuracy of a navigation system for oral implantology using either a head-mounted display (HMD) or a monitor as a device for visualization.

Methods

Drilling experiments in plastic mandibles were performed by seven investigators supported by a navigation system using an HMD. A set of drilling experiments was carried out using a traditional monitor setup as standard of reference. Prior to the experiments, CT scans of the mandibles were performed. Positions of the boreholes were determined with the planning software Mimics\(^{\circledR }\). In order to find the correct positions of the boreholes, individuals had to match two pairs of crosshairs. By an infrared tracking device, the navigation system was able to spot the artificial jaw and the angular piece of the drill allowing for the navigation. After the experiments, a second CT scan was acquired: (i) to identify the beginning and the end of the boreholes, (ii) to compare the positions of the planned implant and the boreholes and (iii) to calculate the deviations.

Results

Overall deviation of the starting point of the borehole was \(1.24 \pm 0.84\,\mathrm{mm}\) for the HMD and \(1.12 \pm 0.68\,\mathrm{mm}\) for the monitor, \(2.68 \pm 1.65\,\mathrm{mm}\) of the end point of the borehole for the HMD and \(2.46 \pm 1.34\,\mathrm{mm}\) for the monitor. The mean deviation of the axis was \(4.68^{\circ }\pm 3.7^{\circ }\) for the HMD and \(4.53^{\circ }\pm 4.17^{\circ }\) for the monitor.

Conclusions

As overall accuracies do not differ significantly, the two methods seem to be equal. Personal skills seem to be crucial as the results show remarkable differences among the test persons. The results of our study demonstrate that the use of an HMD has no major drawbacks compared to the monitor setting. The striking advantage is that the surgeon is no longer obliged to turn his head away from the operation site during navigation, as all data relevant for the procedure are superimposed on the image of the real world in his field of view.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kral F, Puschban EJ, Riechelmann H, Pedross F, Freysinger W (2011) Optical and electromagnetic tracking for navigated surgery of the sinuses and frontal skull base. Rhinology 49(3):364–368. doi:10.4193/Rhin PubMed Kral F, Puschban EJ, Riechelmann H, Pedross F, Freysinger W (2011) Optical and electromagnetic tracking for navigated surgery of the sinuses and frontal skull base. Rhinology 49(3):364–368. doi:10.​4193/​Rhin PubMed
2.
go back to reference Tsuda K, Ishikawa E, Zaboronok A, Nakai K, Yamamoto T, Sakamoto N, Uemae Y, Tsurubuchi T, Akutsu H, Ihara S, Ayuzawa S, Takano S, Matsumura A (2011) Navigation-guided endoscopic biopsy for intraparenchymal brain tumor. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 51(10):694–700CrossRef Tsuda K, Ishikawa E, Zaboronok A, Nakai K, Yamamoto T, Sakamoto N, Uemae Y, Tsurubuchi T, Akutsu H, Ihara S, Ayuzawa S, Takano S, Matsumura A (2011) Navigation-guided endoscopic biopsy for intraparenchymal brain tumor. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 51(10):694–700CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wenger T, Nowatschin S, Wittmann W, Hurka F, Strauss G, Lueth TC (2011) Design and accuracy evaluation of a new navigated drill system for computer assisted ENT-surgery. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:1233–1236. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090290 PubMed Wenger T, Nowatschin S, Wittmann W, Hurka F, Strauss G, Lueth TC (2011) Design and accuracy evaluation of a new navigated drill system for computer assisted ENT-surgery. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:1233–1236. doi:10.​1109/​IEMBS.​2011.​6090290 PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ewers R, Schicho K, Truppe M, Seemann R, Reichwein A, Figl M, Wagner A (2004) Computer-aided navigation in dental implantology: 7 years of clinical experience. J Oral Maxil Surg 62(3):329–334CrossRef Ewers R, Schicho K, Truppe M, Seemann R, Reichwein A, Figl M, Wagner A (2004) Computer-aided navigation in dental implantology: 7 years of clinical experience. J Oral Maxil Surg 62(3):329–334CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Siessegger M, Schneider BT, Mischkowski RA, Lazar F, Krug B, Klesper B, Zoller JE (2001) Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites. J Cranio Maxill Surg 29(5):276–281. doi:10.1054/jcms.2001.0242 Siessegger M, Schneider BT, Mischkowski RA, Lazar F, Krug B, Klesper B, Zoller JE (2001) Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites. J Cranio Maxill Surg 29(5):276–281. doi:10.​1054/​jcms.​2001.​0242
12.
go back to reference Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Figl M, Patruta S, Wagner A, Watzinger F, Yerit K, Schicho K, Hanel R, Kainberger F, Imhof H, Bergmann H, Ewers R (2002) Computer-enhanced stereoscopic vision in a head-mounted display for oral implant surgery. Clin Oral Implan Res 13(6):610–616CrossRef Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Figl M, Patruta S, Wagner A, Watzinger F, Yerit K, Schicho K, Hanel R, Kainberger F, Imhof H, Bergmann H, Ewers R (2002) Computer-enhanced stereoscopic vision in a head-mounted display for oral implant surgery. Clin Oral Implan Res 13(6):610–616CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Blackwell M, Morgan F, DiGioia AM 3rd (1998) Augmented reality and its future in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:111–122PubMedCrossRef Blackwell M, Morgan F, DiGioia AM 3rd (1998) Augmented reality and its future in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:111–122PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Day PN, Ferguson G, O‘Brian Holt P, Hogg S, Gibson D (2005) Wearable augmented virtual reality for enhancing information delivery in high precision defence assembly: an engineering case study. Virt Real 8:177–184CrossRef Day PN, Ferguson G, O‘Brian Holt P, Hogg S, Gibson D (2005) Wearable augmented virtual reality for enhancing information delivery in high precision defence assembly: an engineering case study. Virt Real 8:177–184CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Santos BSDP, Pimentel A, Baggerman JW, Ferreira C, Silva S, Madeira J (2009) Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study. Multimed Tools Appl 41:161–181. doi:10.1007/s11042-008-0223-2 CrossRef Santos BSDP, Pimentel A, Baggerman JW, Ferreira C, Silva S, Madeira J (2009) Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study. Multimed Tools Appl 41:161–181. doi:10.​1007/​s11042-008-0223-2 CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Prendergast CJ, Ryder BA, Abodeely A, Muratore CS, Crawford GP, Luks FI (2009) Surgical performance with head-mounted displays in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 19(Suppl 1):S237–240. doi:10.1089/lap.2008.0142 CrossRef Prendergast CJ, Ryder BA, Abodeely A, Muratore CS, Crawford GP, Luks FI (2009) Surgical performance with head-mounted displays in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 19(Suppl 1):S237–240. doi:10.​1089/​lap.​2008.​0142 CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Draper MH, Viire ES, Furness TA, Gawron VJ (2001) Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors 43(1):129–146PubMedCrossRef Draper MH, Viire ES, Furness TA, Gawron VJ (2001) Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors 43(1):129–146PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Moss JD, Muth ER (2011) Characteristics of head-mounted displays and their effects on simulator sickness. Human Factors 53(3):308–319PubMedCrossRef Moss JD, Muth ER (2011) Characteristics of head-mounted displays and their effects on simulator sickness. Human Factors 53(3):308–319PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The use of a head-mounted display in oral implantology: a feasibility study
Authors
Balázs Vigh
Steffen Müller
Oliver Ristow
Herbert Deppe
Stuart Holdstock
Jürgen den Hollander
Nassir Navab
Timm Steiner
Bettina Hohlweg-Majert
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0912-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 1/2014 Go to the issue