Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2022

01-12-2022 | Study protocol

The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools

Authors: Suzy Clarkson, Lucy Bowes, Elinor Coulman, Matthew R. Broome, Rebecca Cannings-John, Joanna M. Charles, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Tamsin Ford, Richard P. Hastings, Rachel Hayes, Paul Patterson, Jeremy Segrott, Julia Townson, Richard Watkins, Julia Badger, Judy Hutchings, the Stand Together Team

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reducing bullying is a public health priority. KiVa, a school-based anti-bullying programme, is effective in reducing bullying in Finland and requires rigorous testing in other countries, including the UK. This trial aims to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa in reducing child reported bullying in UK schools compared to usual practice. The trial is currently on-going. Recruitment commenced in October 2019, however due to COVID-19 pandemic and resulting school closures was re-started in October 2020.

Methods

Design: Two-arm pragmatic multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with an embedded process and cost-effectiveness evaluation.
Participants: 116 primary schools from four areas; North Wales, West Midlands, South East and South West England. Outcomes will be assessed at student level (ages 7–11 years; n = approximately 13,000 students).
Intervention: KiVa is a whole school programme with universal actions that places a strong emphasis on changing bystander behaviour alongside indicated actions that provide consistent strategies for dealing with incidents of bullying. KiVa will be implemented over one academic year.
Comparator: Usual practice.
Primary outcome: Student-level bullying-victimisation assessed through self-report using the extensively used and validated Olweus Bully/Victim questionnaire at baseline and 12-month follow-up.
Secondary outcomes: student-level bullying-perpetration; student mental health and emotional well-being; student level of, and roles in, bullying; school related well-being; school attendance and academic attainment; and teachers’ self-efficacy in dealing with bullying, mental well-being, and burnout.
Sample size: 116 schools (58 per arm) with an assumed ICC of 0.02 will provide 90% power to identify a relative reduction of 22% with a 5% significance level.
Randomisation: recruited schools will be randomised on 1:1 basis stratified by Key-Stage 2 size and free school meal status.
Process evaluation: assess implementation fidelity, identify influences on KiVa implementation, and examine intervention mechanisms.
Economic evaluation: Self-reported victimisation, Child Health Utility 9D, Client Service Receipt Inventory, frequency of services used, and intervention costs. The health economic analysis will be conducted from a schools and societal perspective.

Discussion

This two-arm pragmatic multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial will evaluate the KiVa anti-bullying intervention to generate evidence of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and scalability of the programme in the UK. Our integrated process evaluation will assess implementation fidelity, identify influences on KiVa implementation across England and Wales and examine intervention mechanisms. The integrated health economic analysis will be conducted from a schools and societal perspective. Our trial will also provide evidence regarding the programme impact on inequalities by testing whether KiVa is effective across the socio-economic gradient.

Trial registration

Trials ISRCTN 12300853 Date assigned 11/02/2020.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ford T, O M, M. W. Children and Young People’s mental health. London: TSO; 2014. Ford T, O M, M. W. Children and Young People’s mental health. London: TSO; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Olweus D. Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1994;35(7):1171–90.PubMedCrossRef Olweus D. Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1994;35(7):1171–90.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bowes L, Joinson C, Wolke D, Lewis G. Peer victimisation during adolescence and its impact on depression in early adulthood: prospective cohort study in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 2015;350:h2469.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bowes L, Joinson C, Wolke D, Lewis G. Peer victimisation during adolescence and its impact on depression in early adulthood: prospective cohort study in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 2015;350:h2469.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fisher HL, Moffitt TE, Houts RM, Belsky DW, Arseneault L, Caspi A. Bullying victimisation and risk of self harm in early adolescence: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e2683.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fisher HL, Moffitt TE, Houts RM, Belsky DW, Arseneault L, Caspi A. Bullying victimisation and risk of self harm in early adolescence: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e2683.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brimblecombe N, Evans-Lacko S, Knapp M, King D, Takizawa R, Maughan B, et al. Long term economic impact associated with childhood bullying victimisation. Soc Sci Med. 2018;208:134–41.PubMedCrossRef Brimblecombe N, Evans-Lacko S, Knapp M, King D, Takizawa R, Maughan B, et al. Long term economic impact associated with childhood bullying victimisation. Soc Sci Med. 2018;208:134–41.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Takizawa R, Maughan B, Arseneault L. Adult health outcomes of childhood bullying victimization: evidence from a five-decade longitudinal British birth cohort. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(7):777–84.PubMedCrossRef Takizawa R, Maughan B, Arseneault L. Adult health outcomes of childhood bullying victimization: evidence from a five-decade longitudinal British birth cohort. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(7):777–84.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brown V, Clery E, Ferguson C. Estimating the prevalence of young people absent from school due to bullying. Nat Centre Soc Res. 2011;1:1–61. Brown V, Clery E, Ferguson C. Estimating the prevalence of young people absent from school due to bullying. Nat Centre Soc Res. 2011;1:1–61.
8.
go back to reference Kearney CA. School absenteeism and school refusal behavior in youth: a contemporary review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(3):451–71.PubMedCrossRef Kearney CA. School absenteeism and school refusal behavior in youth: a contemporary review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(3):451–71.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ttofi MM, Farrington DP, Lösel F. School bullying as a predictor of violence later in life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies. Aggress Violent Behav. 2012;17(5):405–18.CrossRef Ttofi MM, Farrington DP, Lösel F. School bullying as a predictor of violence later in life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies. Aggress Violent Behav. 2012;17(5):405–18.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ttofi MM, Farrington DP, Lösel F, Crago RV, Theodorakis N. School bullying and drug use later in life: a meta-analytic investigation. Sch Psychol Q. 2016;31(1):8.PubMedCrossRef Ttofi MM, Farrington DP, Lösel F, Crago RV, Theodorakis N. School bullying and drug use later in life: a meta-analytic investigation. Sch Psychol Q. 2016;31(1):8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Karna A, Voeten M, Little TD, Poskiparta E, Kaljonen A, Salmivalli C. A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4-6. Child Dev. 2011;82(1):311–30.PubMedCrossRef Karna A, Voeten M, Little TD, Poskiparta E, Kaljonen A, Salmivalli C. A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4-6. Child Dev. 2011;82(1):311–30.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Salmivalli C, , , Kärnä A, Poskiparta E. Counteracting bullying in Finland: the KiVa program and its effect on different forms of being bullied. Int J Behav Dev 2011;35(5):405–411.CrossRef Salmivalli C, , , Kärnä A, Poskiparta E. Counteracting bullying in Finland: the KiVa program and its effect on different forms of being bullied. Int J Behav Dev 2011;35(5):405–411.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Williford A, Boulton A, Noland B, Little TD, Karna A, Salmivalli C. Effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on adolescents' depression, anxiety, and perception of peers. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012;40(2):289–300.PubMedCrossRef Williford A, Boulton A, Noland B, Little TD, Karna A, Salmivalli C. Effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on adolescents' depression, anxiety, and perception of peers. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012;40(2):289–300.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kärnä A, Voeten M, Little TD, Poskiparta E, Alanen E, Salmivalli C. Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for grades 1–9. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79(6):796–805.PubMedCrossRef Kärnä A, Voeten M, Little TD, Poskiparta E, Alanen E, Salmivalli C. Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for grades 1–9. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79(6):796–805.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Persson M, Wennberg L, Beckman L, Salmivalli C, Svensson M. The cost-effectiveness of the kiva antibullying program: results from a decision-analytic model. Prev Sci. 2018;19(6):728–37.PubMedCrossRef Persson M, Wennberg L, Beckman L, Salmivalli C, Svensson M. The cost-effectiveness of the kiva antibullying program: results from a decision-analytic model. Prev Sci. 2018;19(6):728–37.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nocentini A, Menesini E. KiVa anti-bullying program in Italy: evidence of effectiveness in a randomized control trial. Prev Sci. 2016;17(8):1012–23.PubMedCrossRef Nocentini A, Menesini E. KiVa anti-bullying program in Italy: evidence of effectiveness in a randomized control trial. Prev Sci. 2016;17(8):1012–23.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Huitsing G, Lodder GMA, Browne WJ, Oldenburg B, Van der Ploeg R, Veenstra R. A large-scale replication of the effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying program: a randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands. Prev Sci. 2020;21(5):627–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Huitsing G, Lodder GMA, Browne WJ, Oldenburg B, Van der Ploeg R, Veenstra R. A large-scale replication of the effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying program: a randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands. Prev Sci. 2020;21(5):627–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Axford N, Bjornstad G, Clarkson S, Ukoumunne OC, Wrigley Z, Matthews J, et al. The effectiveness of the KiVa bullying prevention program in Wales, UK: results from a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Prev Sci. 2020;21:615–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Axford N, Bjornstad G, Clarkson S, Ukoumunne OC, Wrigley Z, Matthews J, et al. The effectiveness of the KiVa bullying prevention program in Wales, UK: results from a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Prev Sci. 2020;21:615–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Clarkson S, Charles JM, Saville CW, Bjornstad GJ, Hutchings J. Introducing KiVa school-based antibullying programme to the UK: A preliminary examination of effectiveness and programme cost. School Psychol Int. 2019;40(4):347–65.CrossRef Clarkson S, Charles JM, Saville CW, Bjornstad GJ, Hutchings J. Introducing KiVa school-based antibullying programme to the UK: A preliminary examination of effectiveness and programme cost. School Psychol Int. 2019;40(4):347–65.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Education Df. Schools, pupils and their characteristics: January 2018. In: Statistics N, editor 2018. Education Df. Schools, pupils and their characteristics: January 2018. In: Statistics N, editor 2018.
22.
go back to reference Salmivalli C, Lagerspetz K, Bjorkqvist K, Osterman K. Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggress Behav. 1996;22:1–15.CrossRef Salmivalli C, Lagerspetz K, Bjorkqvist K, Osterman K. Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggress Behav. 1996;22:1–15.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gaffney H, Farrington DP, Ttofi MM. Examining the effectiveness of school-bullying intervention programs globally: a Meta-analysis. Int J Bull Prev. 2019;1:14–31.CrossRef Gaffney H, Farrington DP, Ttofi MM. Examining the effectiveness of school-bullying intervention programs globally: a Meta-analysis. Int J Bull Prev. 2019;1:14–31.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Smith JD, Schneider BH, Smith PK, Ananiadou K. The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: a synthesis of evaluation research. Sch Psychol Rev. 2004;33(4):547.CrossRef Smith JD, Schneider BH, Smith PK, Ananiadou K. The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: a synthesis of evaluation research. Sch Psychol Rev. 2004;33(4):547.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Olweus D. The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire; 1996. Olweus D. The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire; 1996.
26.
go back to reference Solberg ME, Olweus D. Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Aggress Behav. 2003;29(3):239–68.CrossRef Solberg ME, Olweus D. Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Aggress Behav. 2003;29(3):239–68.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Allen K, Marlow R, Edwards V, Parker C, Rodgers L, Ukoumunne OC, et al. ‘How I feel about my school’: the construction and validation of a measure of wellbeing at school for primary school children. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018;23(1):25–41.PubMedCrossRef Allen K, Marlow R, Edwards V, Parker C, Rodgers L, Ukoumunne OC, et al. ‘How I feel about my school’: the construction and validation of a measure of wellbeing at school for primary school children. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018;23(1):25–41.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Salmivalli C, Voeten M. Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviors associated with bullying in schools. Int J Behav Dev. 2004;28:246–58.CrossRef Salmivalli C, Voeten M. Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviors associated with bullying in schools. Int J Behav Dev. 2004;28:246–58.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(11):1337–45.PubMedCrossRef Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(11):1337–45.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hastings RPB, T. Behavioural knowledge, causal beliefs and self-efficacy as predictors of special educators’ emotional reactions to challenging behavious. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2002;46:144–50.PubMedCrossRef Hastings RPB, T. Behavioural knowledge, causal beliefs and self-efficacy as predictors of special educators’ emotional reactions to challenging behavious. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2002;46:144–50.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP, Schaufeli WB, Schwab RL. Maslach burnout inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1986. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP, Schaufeli WB, Schwab RL. Maslach burnout inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1986.
33.
go back to reference Ratcliffe J, Stevens K, Flynn T, Brazier J, M. S. An assessment of the construct validity of the CHU9D in the Australian adolescent general population. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):717–25.PubMedCrossRef Ratcliffe J, Stevens K, Flynn T, Brazier J, M. S. An assessment of the construct validity of the CHU9D in the Australian adolescent general population. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):717–25.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Stevens KJ. The child health utility 9D (CHU9D)—a new paediatric preference-based measure of health-related quality of life. Pro Newslett. 2010;43:11–2. Stevens KJ. The child health utility 9D (CHU9D)—a new paediatric preference-based measure of health-related quality of life. Pro Newslett. 2010;43:11–2.
35.
go back to reference Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, al GSe. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358.j3453. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, al GSe. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358.j3453.
36.
go back to reference Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350.h1258. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350.h1258.
38.
go back to reference Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Dunn G, Maracy M, Tomenson B. Estimating treatment effects from randomized clinical trials with non-compliance and loss to follow-up: the role of instrumental variable methods. Stat Methods Med Res. 2005;14:369–96.PubMedCrossRef Dunn G, Maracy M, Tomenson B. Estimating treatment effects from randomized clinical trials with non-compliance and loss to follow-up: the role of instrumental variable methods. Stat Methods Med Res. 2005;14:369–96.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011;38(1):44–53.CrossRef Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011;38(1):44–53.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SS, Polsky D. Economic evaluation in clinical trials. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SS, Polsky D. Economic evaluation in clinical trials. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
43.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care Programmes. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 2015. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care Programmes. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 2015.
44.
go back to reference Tudor Edwards R, McIntosh E. Applied health economics for public health practice and research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.CrossRef Tudor Edwards R, McIntosh E. Applied health economics for public health practice and research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference NICE. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 3rd ed; 2012. NICE. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 3rd ed; 2012.
46.
go back to reference Gomes M, Ng ESW, Grieve RD, Nixon R, Carpenter J, Thompson SG. Developing appropriate methods for cost-effectiveness analysis of cluster randomized trials. Med Decis Making. 2012;32:350–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gomes M, Ng ESW, Grieve RD, Nixon R, Carpenter J, Thompson SG. Developing appropriate methods for cost-effectiveness analysis of cluster randomized trials. Med Decis Making. 2012;32:350–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Thorn JC, Davies CF, Brookes ST, Noble SM, Dritsaki M, Gray E, et al. Content of health economics analysis plans (HEAPs) for trial-based economic evaluations: expert Delphi consensus survey. Value Health. 2021;24(4):539–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Thorn JC, Davies CF, Brookes ST, Noble SM, Dritsaki M, Gray E, et al. Content of health economics analysis plans (HEAPs) for trial-based economic evaluations: expert Delphi consensus survey. Value Health. 2021;24(4):539–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools
Authors
Suzy Clarkson
Lucy Bowes
Elinor Coulman
Matthew R. Broome
Rebecca Cannings-John
Joanna M. Charles
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Tamsin Ford
Richard P. Hastings
Rachel Hayes
Paul Patterson
Jeremy Segrott
Julia Townson
Richard Watkins
Julia Badger
Judy Hutchings
the Stand Together Team
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12642-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Public Health 1/2022 Go to the issue