Top

Published in:

01-11-2016

KiVa Anti-Bullying Program in Italy: Evidence of Effectiveness in a Randomized Control Trial

Authors: Annalaura Nocentini, Ersilia Menesini

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 8/2016

Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the KiVa anti-bullying program in Italy through a randomized control trial of students in grades 4 and 6. The sample involved 2042 students (51 % female; grade 4, mean age = 8.85; ds = 0.43; grade 6, mean age = 10.93; ds = 0.50); 13 comprehensive schools were randomly assigned into intervention (KiVa) or control (usual school provision) conditions. Different outcomes (bullying, victimization, pro-bullying attitudes, pro-victim attitudes, empathy toward victims), analyses (longitudinal mixed model with multiple-item scales; longitudinal prevalence of bullies and victims using Olweus’ single question), and estimates of effectiveness (Cohen’s d; odds ratios) were considered in order to compare the Italian results with those from other countries. Multilevel models showed that KiVa reduced bullying and victimization and increased pro-victim attitudes and empathy toward the victim in grade 4, with effect sizes from 0.24 to 0.40. In grade 6, KiVa reduced bullying, victimization, and pro-bullying attitudes; the effects were smaller as compared to grade 4, yet significant (d ≥ 0.20). Finally, using Olweus dichotomous definition of bullies and victims, results showed that the odds of being a victim were 1.93 times higher for a control student than for a KiVa student in grade 4. Overall, the findings provide evidence of the effectiveness of the program in Italy; the discussion will focus on factors that influenced successfully the transportability of the KiVa program in Italy.

In Italian primary schools, there is 1 computer for every 16 students (the European mean is 1 for every 7 students) and 1 for every 12 students in the secondary schools (European mean is 1 for every 5). Internet is available in 1 computer for every 333 students in primary school and 1 for every 125 in secondary school (European means are, respectively, 1 for every 20 students and 1 for every 15 students; European Schoolnet 2013)

The percentage of reduction is calculated as [((% at T2 − % at T1)/|% at T1|) × 100]

Baldry, A. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2007). Effectiveness of programs to prevent school bullying. Victims & Offenders, 2, 183–204.CrossRef

Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., & Holleran Steiker, L. K. (2010). Issues and challenges in the design of culturally adapted evidence-based interventions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 213–239.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2009, 6.

Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E. M., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, C. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale up research in prevention science: Next generation. Prevention Science, 16, 893–926.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Herkama S. & Salmivalli C. (2013). The challenges of cross- national dissemination of the KiVa Anti-bullying program from the developers’ point of view. EARA (European Association for Research on Adolescence) Newsletter May 2013

Hutchins, J., & Clarkson, S. (2015). Introducing and piloting the KiVa bullying prevention programme in the UK. Educational and Child Psychology, 32, 49–61.

Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Effectiveness of the KiVa anti-bullying program: Grades 1-3 and 7-9. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 535–551.CrossRef

Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011a). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa anti-bullying program: Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82, 311–330.CrossRefPubMed

Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2011b). Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa anti-bullying program for comprehensive schools. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 796–805.CrossRefPubMed

Lochmann, J. E., Boxmeyer, C., Powell, C., Qu, L., Wells, K., & Windle, M. (2009). Dissemination of the Coping Power program: Importance of intensity of counselor training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 397–409.CrossRef

Menesini, E., Codecasa, E., Benelli, B., & Cowie, H. (2003). Enhancing children’s responsibility to take action against bullying. Evaluation of a befriending intervention in Italian middle schools. Aggressive Behavior., 29, 1–14.CrossRef

Menesini E., Nocentini A. (2015). Il bullismo a scuola. Come prevenirlo, come intervenire. Psicologia e scuola, n.40, Firenze: Giunti Scuola.

Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Level and change of bullying behavior during high school: a multilevel growth curve analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 495–505.CrossRefPubMed

Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In D. Pepler & K. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–448). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center). Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.

Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2016). Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the Noncadiamointrappola! program in two independent trials. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 194–206.CrossRefPubMed

Pöyhönen, V., Kärnä, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2008). Symposium conducted at the 20th Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development. Germany: Würzburg. Classroom—level moderators of the empathy—defending link.

Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes towards the victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615–627.CrossRefPubMed

Ross, S. W., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Bully prevention in positive behavior support. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 747–759.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Saarento, S., Boulton, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Reducing bullying and victimization: Student- and classroom-level mechanisms of change. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 61–76.CrossRefPubMed

Salmivalli, C., Garandeau, C., & Veenstra, R. (2012). KiVa anti-bullying program: Implications for school adjustment. In G. Ladd & A. Ryan (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010). Development, evaluation, and diffusion of a national anti-bullying program, KiVa. In B. Doll, W. Pfohl, & J. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of youth prevention science (pp. 238–252). New York: Routledge.

Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.CrossRef

Smith, P. K. (2010). Bullying in primary and secondary schools: Psychological and organizational comparisons. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: an international perspective (pp. 137–150). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Sundell, K., Ferrer-Wreder, L., & Fraser, M. W. (2014). Going global: a model for evaluating empirically supported family-based interventions in new contexts. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 37, 203–230.CrossRefPubMed

West, B. T. (2009). Analyzing longitudinal data with the linear mixed models procedure in SPSS. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 32, 207–228.CrossRef

Williford, A., Boulton, A., Noland, B., Kärnä, A., Little, T. Salmivalli. C. (2012). Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on adolescents’ depression, anxiety, and perception of peers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 289–300.

Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56.CrossRef

Veenstra, R. (2014). Groepsprocessen bij jongeren: Over pesten en ander probleemgedrag. Kind en Adolescent, 35, 86–99. verkorte weergave van oratie gehouden op 15 Oktober 2013.CrossRef

Title: KiVa Anti-Bullying Program in Italy: Evidence of Effectiveness in a Randomized Control Trial
Authors: Annalaura Nocentini
Ersilia Menesini
Publication date: 01-11-2016
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Prevention Science / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0690-z

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

KiVa Anti-Bullying Program in Italy: Evidence of Effectiveness in a Randomized Control Trial

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Peer Influence on Academic Performance: A Social Network Analysis of Social-Emotional Intervention Effects

What Constitutes High-Quality Implementation of SEL Programs? A Latent Class Analysis of Second Step® Implementation

Adolescent Gambling-Oriented Attitudes Mediate the Relationship Between Perceived Parental Knowledge and Adolescent Gambling: Implications for Prevention

Identifying and Predicting Distinct Patterns of Implementation in a School-Wide Behavior Support Framework

Correlates of Prenatal Parenting Expectations in new Mothers: Is Better Self-Efficacy a Potential Target for Preventing Postnatal Adjustment Difficulties?

Teen Dating Violence, Sexual Harassment, and Bullying Among Middle School Students: Examining Mediation and Moderated Mediation by Gender