Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Article

The superiority of point of care ultrasound in localizing central venous line tip position over time

Authors: Nahla Zaghloul, Laura Watkins, Jennie Choi-Rosen, Shahana Perveen, Dalibor Kurepa

Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The primary objective was to study agreement between X-rays and point of care ultrasound (POC-US) in determining central venous line (CVL) tip position. The secondary objective was to examine malposition rates over time using POC-US. Fifty-six neonates were enrolled who had a CVL placed. Initial X-rays and POC-US were obtained. POC-US was performed daily thereafter for the total of 6 days. US video clips were acquired in four standard echocardiographic views: subcostal, four-chamber, and short- and long-axis parasternal views. Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC1) for agreement measured inter-rater reliability of X-rays and POC-US (correct position/malposition). A generalized linear mixed model for binary clustered data estimated malposition rate over time. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 and Agree Stat. The study included 108 “pairs” of X-rays and POC-US images. Agreement coefficient (AC1), with respect to correct position/malposition of CVL tip, was high AC1 = 0.872 (UVC-AC1 = 0.814, PICC-AC1 = 0.94). Among birth weight (BW) < 1000 g, 1000–1499 g, and BW > 1500 g, AC1 values were 0.922, 0.774, and 0.873, respectively. CVL tip malposition rate decreased over time.
Conclusions: Agreement between POC-US and X-rays for CVL tip position was high, with the highest in BW < 1000 g. The data suggest that POC-US can be used for initial confirmation and follow up of CVL tip position.
What is Known
• X-ray is currently the gold standard for localizing central venous line (CVL) tip position.
• Malposition of CVL tip can lead to life-threatening complications.
What is New
• POC-US is superior to X-ray as it can follow CVL tip position over time, detecting malpositioned lines, adjusting them in a timely manner thus preventing complications.
• Standardizing CVL placement, X-ray acquisition, POC-US acquisition with four views with video clips and ultrasound operator training increases accuracy and thus agreement between X-ray and POC-US.
• UVC tip is more likely to be malpositoned than PICC tip. Malposition of UVC tip using POC-US decreased over time due to shrinking of the umbilical cord in the first 48 of life.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ades A, Sable C, Cummings S, Cross R, Markle B, Martin G (2003) Echocardiographic evaluation of umbilical venous catheter placement. J Perinatol 23:24–28CrossRefPubMed Ades A, Sable C, Cummings S, Cross R, Markle B, Martin G (2003) Echocardiographic evaluation of umbilical venous catheter placement. J Perinatol 23:24–28CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Collier PE, Goodman GB (1995) Cardiac tamponade caused by central venous catheter perforation of the heart: a preventable complication. J Am Coll Surg 181:459–463PubMed Collier PE, Goodman GB (1995) Cardiac tamponade caused by central venous catheter perforation of the heart: a preventable complication. J Am Coll Surg 181:459–463PubMed
5.
go back to reference Connolly B, Amaral J, Walsh S, Temple M, Chait P, Stephens D (2006) Influence of arm movement on central tip location of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Pediatr Radiol 36(8):845–850CrossRefPubMed Connolly B, Amaral J, Walsh S, Temple M, Chait P, Stephens D (2006) Influence of arm movement on central tip location of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Pediatr Radiol 36(8):845–850CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dunn PM (1966) Localization of the umbilical catheter by post-mortem measurement. Arch Dis Child 4:69–75CrossRef Dunn PM (1966) Localization of the umbilical catheter by post-mortem measurement. Arch Dis Child 4:69–75CrossRef
7.
go back to reference George L, Waldman JD, Cohen ML, Segall ML, Kirkpatrick SE, Turner SW, Pappelbaum SJ (1982) Umbilical vascular catheters: localization by two-dimensional echocardio/aortography. Pediatr Cardiol 2:237–243CrossRefPubMed George L, Waldman JD, Cohen ML, Segall ML, Kirkpatrick SE, Turner SW, Pappelbaum SJ (1982) Umbilical vascular catheters: localization by two-dimensional echocardio/aortography. Pediatr Cardiol 2:237–243CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Green C, Yohannan MD (1998) Umbilical arterial and venous catheters: placement, use, and complications. Neonatal Netw 17(6):23–28PubMed Green C, Yohannan MD (1998) Umbilical arterial and venous catheters: placement, use, and complications. Neonatal Netw 17(6):23–28PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C (2003) Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 16:327–361 Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C (2003) Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 16:327–361
11.
go back to reference Hsu JH, Wang CK, Chu KS, Cheng KI, Chuang HY, Jaw TS, Wu JR (2006) Comparison of radiographic landmarks and the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction in the positioning of long-term central venous catheters. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50:731–735CrossRefPubMed Hsu JH, Wang CK, Chu KS, Cheng KI, Chuang HY, Jaw TS, Wu JR (2006) Comparison of radiographic landmarks and the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction in the positioning of long-term central venous catheters. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50:731–735CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Maury E, Guglielminotti J, Alzieu M, Guidet B, Offenstadt G (2001) Ultrasonic examination: an alternative to chest radiography after central venous catheter insertion? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:403–405CrossRefPubMed Maury E, Guglielminotti J, Alzieu M, Guidet B, Offenstadt G (2001) Ultrasonic examination: an alternative to chest radiography after central venous catheter insertion? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:403–405CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nadroo AM, Glass RB, Lin J, Green RS, Holzman IR (2002) Changes in upper extremity position cause migration of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. Pediatrics 110(1 Pt 1):131–136CrossRefPubMed Nadroo AM, Glass RB, Lin J, Green RS, Holzman IR (2002) Changes in upper extremity position cause migration of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. Pediatrics 110(1 Pt 1):131–136CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ohki Y, Tabata M, Kuwashima M, Takeuchi H, Nako Y, Morikawa A (2000) Ultrasonographic detection of very thin percutaneous central venous catheter in neonates. Acta Paediatr 89:1381–1384CrossRefPubMed Ohki Y, Tabata M, Kuwashima M, Takeuchi H, Nako Y, Morikawa A (2000) Ultrasonographic detection of very thin percutaneous central venous catheter in neonates. Acta Paediatr 89:1381–1384CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Racadio JM, Doellman DA, Johnson ND, Bean JA, Jacobs BR (2001) Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheters: complication rates related to catheter tip location. Pediatrics 107(2):E28CrossRefPubMed Racadio JM, Doellman DA, Johnson ND, Bean JA, Jacobs BR (2001) Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheters: complication rates related to catheter tip location. Pediatrics 107(2):E28CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Shukla H, Ferrara A (1986) Rapid estimation of insertional length of umbilical catheters in newborns. Am J Dis Child 140:786–788PubMed Shukla H, Ferrara A (1986) Rapid estimation of insertional length of umbilical catheters in newborns. Am J Dis Child 140:786–788PubMed
Metadata
Title
The superiority of point of care ultrasound in localizing central venous line tip position over time
Authors
Nahla Zaghloul
Laura Watkins
Jennie Choi-Rosen
Shahana Perveen
Dalibor Kurepa
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-6199
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3269-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

European Journal of Pediatrics 2/2019 Go to the issue