Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2015

01-01-2015 | Preclinical study

The prognostic relevance of the mitotic activity index in axillary lymph node-negative breast cancer

Authors: Jan J. Jobsen, Job van der Palen, Mariël Brinkhuis, Johan W. R. Nortier, Henk Struikmans

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to look at the mitotic activity index (MAI) as a prognostic factor in a prospective population-based cohort of lymph node-negative invasive breast cancer patients. Analyses were based on 2,048 breast-conserving therapies in 1,971 patients, node-negative, and without any form of adjuvant systemic therapy with long-term follow-up. The 15-year distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) for women ≤55 years was 88.3 % for low MAI values (≤12) versus 73.4 % for high MAI values (>12); (HR 2.8; 95 % CI 1.8–4.4; p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses for DMFS showed significance for MAI. For MAI and Bloom–Richardson grading, by performing a likelihood ratio test, we showed the statistical significance for both. For women >55-years, the MAI was not an independent significant factor. We also confirmed the above findings for disease-specific survival. When multi-gene assays are not available, the MAI remains a robust prognostic marker in women younger than 55 years of age with early node-negative breast cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fitzgibbons PL, Page KL, Weaver D et al (2000) Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:966–975PubMed Fitzgibbons PL, Page KL, Weaver D et al (2000) Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:966–975PubMed
2.
go back to reference Baak JPA, van Diest PJ, Voorhorst FJ et al (2005) Prospective multicenter validation of the independent prognostic value of the mitotic activity index in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients younger than 55 years. J Clin Oncol 23:5993–6001PubMedCrossRef Baak JPA, van Diest PJ, Voorhorst FJ et al (2005) Prospective multicenter validation of the independent prognostic value of the mitotic activity index in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients younger than 55 years. J Clin Oncol 23:5993–6001PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lende TH, Janssen EAM, Gudlaugsson E et al (2011) In patients younger than age 55 years with lymph node-negative breast cancer, proliferation by mitotic activity is prognostically superior to adjuvant. J Clin Oncol 29:852–858PubMedCrossRef Lende TH, Janssen EAM, Gudlaugsson E et al (2011) In patients younger than age 55 years with lymph node-negative breast cancer, proliferation by mitotic activity is prognostically superior to adjuvant. J Clin Oncol 29:852–858PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Skaland I, van Diest PJ, Janssen EAM et al (2008) Prognostic differences of World Health Organization-assessed mitotic activity index and mitotic impression by quick scanning in invasive ductal breast cancer patients younger than 55 years. Hum Pathol 39:584–590PubMedCrossRef Skaland I, van Diest PJ, Janssen EAM et al (2008) Prognostic differences of World Health Organization-assessed mitotic activity index and mitotic impression by quick scanning in invasive ductal breast cancer patients younger than 55 years. Hum Pathol 39:584–590PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Louwman WJ, van Beek MWPM, Schapers RFM et al (2006) Long-term survival of T1 and T2 lymph node-negative breast cancer patients according to mitotic activity index: a population-based study. Int J Cancer 118:2310–2314PubMedCrossRef Louwman WJ, van Beek MWPM, Schapers RFM et al (2006) Long-term survival of T1 and T2 lymph node-negative breast cancer patients according to mitotic activity index: a population-based study. Int J Cancer 118:2310–2314PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Medri L, Volpi A, Nanni O et al (2003) Prognostic relevance of mitotic activity in patients with node-negative breast cancer. Mod Pathol 16:1067–1075PubMedCrossRef Medri L, Volpi A, Nanni O et al (2003) Prognostic relevance of mitotic activity in patients with node-negative breast cancer. Mod Pathol 16:1067–1075PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Michels JJ, Marnay J, Delozier T et al (2004) Proliferative activity in primary breast carcinomas is a salient prognostic factor. Cancer 100:455–464PubMedCrossRef Michels JJ, Marnay J, Delozier T et al (2004) Proliferative activity in primary breast carcinomas is a salient prognostic factor. Cancer 100:455–464PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gudlaugsson E, Skaland I, Janssen EAM et al (2010) Prospective multicenter comparison of proliferation and other prognostic factors in lymph node negative lobular invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121:35–40PubMedCrossRef Gudlaugsson E, Skaland I, Janssen EAM et al (2010) Prospective multicenter comparison of proliferation and other prognostic factors in lymph node negative lobular invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121:35–40PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baak JPA, Gudlaugsson E, Skaland I et al (2009) Proliferation is the strongest prognosticator in node-negative breast cancer: significance, error sources, alternatives and comparison with molecular prognostic markers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:241–254PubMedCrossRef Baak JPA, Gudlaugsson E, Skaland I et al (2009) Proliferation is the strongest prognosticator in node-negative breast cancer: significance, error sources, alternatives and comparison with molecular prognostic markers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:241–254PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Baak JP, van Diest PJ, Janssen EA et al (2008) Proliferation accurately identifies the high-risk patients among small, low-grade, lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers. Ann Oncol 19:649–654PubMedCrossRef Baak JP, van Diest PJ, Janssen EA et al (2008) Proliferation accurately identifies the high-risk patients among small, low-grade, lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers. Ann Oncol 19:649–654PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Baak JP, van Diest PJ, Voorhorst FJ et al (2007) The prognostic value of proliferation in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients is age dependent. Eur J Cancer 43:527–535PubMedCrossRef Baak JP, van Diest PJ, Voorhorst FJ et al (2007) The prognostic value of proliferation in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients is age dependent. Eur J Cancer 43:527–535PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Baak JP, Colpaert CG, van Diest PJ et al (2005) Multivariate prognostic evaluation of the mitotic activity index and fibrotic focus in node-negative invasive breast cancers. Eur J Cancer 41:2093–2101PubMedCrossRef Baak JP, Colpaert CG, van Diest PJ et al (2005) Multivariate prognostic evaluation of the mitotic activity index and fibrotic focus in node-negative invasive breast cancers. Eur J Cancer 41:2093–2101PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Genestie C, Zafrani B, Asselain B et al (1998) Comparison of the prognostic value of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson and Nottingham histological grades in a series of 825 cases of breast cancer: major importance of the mitotic count as a component of both grading systems. Anticancer Res 18:571–576PubMed Genestie C, Zafrani B, Asselain B et al (1998) Comparison of the prognostic value of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson and Nottingham histological grades in a series of 825 cases of breast cancer: major importance of the mitotic count as a component of both grading systems. Anticancer Res 18:571–576PubMed
14.
go back to reference Le Doussal V, Tubiana-Hulin M, Friedman S et al (1989) Prognostic value of histological grade nuclear components of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson. An improved score modification based on a multivariate analysis of 1262 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. Cancer 64:1914–1921PubMedCrossRef Le Doussal V, Tubiana-Hulin M, Friedman S et al (1989) Prognostic value of histological grade nuclear components of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson. An improved score modification based on a multivariate analysis of 1262 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. Cancer 64:1914–1921PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS et al (2013) Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 24:2206–2223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS et al (2013) Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 24:2206–2223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Carlson JJ, Roth JA (2013) The impact on the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141:13–22PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Carlson JJ, Roth JA (2013) The impact on the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141:13–22PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors for breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410PubMedCrossRef Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors for breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fiets WE, Bellot FE, Struikmans H et al (2005) Prognostic value of mitotic count in axillary node negative breast cancer patients with predominantly well-differentiated tumours. EJSO 31:128–133PubMedCrossRef Fiets WE, Bellot FE, Struikmans H et al (2005) Prognostic value of mitotic count in axillary node negative breast cancer patients with predominantly well-differentiated tumours. EJSO 31:128–133PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Volpi A, Bacci F, Pardiso A et al (2004) Prognostic relevance of histological grade and its components in node-negative breast cancer patients. Mod Pathol 17:1038–1044PubMedCrossRef Volpi A, Bacci F, Pardiso A et al (2004) Prognostic relevance of histological grade and its components in node-negative breast cancer patients. Mod Pathol 17:1038–1044PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Mirza AN, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G et al (2002) Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer. A review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years. Ann Surg 235:10–26PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mirza AN, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G et al (2002) Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer. A review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years. Ann Surg 235:10–26PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The prognostic relevance of the mitotic activity index in axillary lymph node-negative breast cancer
Authors
Jan J. Jobsen
Job van der Palen
Mariël Brinkhuis
Johan W. R. Nortier
Henk Struikmans
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3244-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine