Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Article

The patient experience of musculoskeletal imaging tests for investigation of inflammatory arthritis: a mixed-methods study

Authors: Sandra Bourke, William J. Taylor, Anthony J. Doyle, Merryn Gott, Nicola Dalbeth

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to understand the patient experience of musculoskeletal imaging tests for investigation of inflammatory arthritis and factors that contribute to this experience. We conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 33 patients who had a recent peripheral joint musculoskeletal imaging test for investigation of inflammatory arthritis. Data from these interviews were used to generate an 18-item questionnaire which was posted to rheumatology clinic patients within 6 weeks of peripheral joint imaging. Variables associated with the overall experience of the test were analysed using stepwise linear regression. Analysis of the interviews identified six themes: knowledge about the test, awareness of potential harm, the role of imaging in clinical care, discomfort, experience of waiting and ‘seeing is believing’. Completed questionnaires were available from 132 patients. In regression analysis, a strong negative association was observed between the ‘discomfort during the test’ item and the overall experience of the test (standardised beta −0.35, p < 0.001). ‘Staff made the experience better’ (0.26, p < 0.001) and ‘information provided’ (0.28, p < 0.001) were positively associated with the overall experience of the test. For those who viewed their images, ‘looking at the images with my doctor made me feel more involved in my care’ (0.24, p = 0.022) was also associated positively with overall experience. Factors before, during and after a musculoskeletal imaging test contribute to the patient experience. The overall experience is most influenced by patient discomfort and interactions with staff during the test, information provided and viewing images to improve patient involvement in clinical care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Thorp D, Owens RG, Whitehouse G, Dewey ME (1990) Subjective experiences of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol 41:276–278CrossRefPubMed Thorp D, Owens RG, Whitehouse G, Dewey ME (1990) Subjective experiences of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol 41:276–278CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference De Leonardis F, Orzincolo C, Prandini N, Trotta F (2008) The role of conventional radiography and scintigraphy in the third millennium. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 22:961–979CrossRefPubMed De Leonardis F, Orzincolo C, Prandini N, Trotta F (2008) The role of conventional radiography and scintigraphy in the third millennium. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 22:961–979CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Makanjee CR, Bergh AM, Hoffmann WA. Healthcare provider and patient perspectives on diagnostic imaging investigations. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2015; 7 Makanjee CR, Bergh AM, Hoffmann WA. Healthcare provider and patient perspectives on diagnostic imaging investigations. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2015; 7
4.
go back to reference Carlsson S, Carlsson E (2013) The situation and the uncertainty about the coming result scared me but interaction with the radiographers helped me through’: a qualitative study on patients’ experiences of magnetic resonance imaging examinations. J Clin Nurs 22:3225–3234CrossRefPubMed Carlsson S, Carlsson E (2013) The situation and the uncertainty about the coming result scared me but interaction with the radiographers helped me through’: a qualitative study on patients’ experiences of magnetic resonance imaging examinations. J Clin Nurs 22:3225–3234CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Törnqviste E, Månsson Å, Larsson E-M, Hallström I (2006) It’s like being in another world-patients’ lived experience of magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Nurs 15:954–961CrossRef Törnqviste E, Månsson Å, Larsson E-M, Hallström I (2006) It’s like being in another world-patients’ lived experience of magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Nurs 15:954–961CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Munn Z, Jordan Z (2011) The patient experience of high technology medical imaging: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Radiography 17:323–331CrossRef Munn Z, Jordan Z (2011) The patient experience of high technology medical imaging: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Radiography 17:323–331CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nightingale JM, Murphy FJ, Blakeley C (2012) ‘I thought it was just an x-ray’: a qualitative investigation of patient experiences in cardiac SPECT-CT imaging. Nucl Med Commun 33:246–254CrossRefPubMed Nightingale JM, Murphy FJ, Blakeley C (2012) ‘I thought it was just an x-ray’: a qualitative investigation of patient experiences in cardiac SPECT-CT imaging. Nucl Med Commun 33:246–254CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dewey M, Schink T, Dewey C (2007) Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: cohort study in over 50,000 patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1322–1327CrossRefPubMed Dewey M, Schink T, Dewey C (2007) Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: cohort study in over 50,000 patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1322–1327CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Watling CJ, Lingard L (2012) Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70. Med Teach 34:850–861CrossRefPubMed Watling CJ, Lingard L (2012) Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70. Med Teach 34:850–861CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ryan F, Coughlan M, Cronin P (2007) Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research. Br J Nurs 16:738–744CrossRefPubMed Ryan F, Coughlan M, Cronin P (2007) Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research. Br J Nurs 16:738–744CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Si SX, Cullen JB (1998) Response categories and potential cultural bias: effects of an explicit middle point in cross-cultural surveys. The international journal of organizational analysis 6:218–230CrossRef Si SX, Cullen JB (1998) Response categories and potential cultural bias: effects of an explicit middle point in cross-cultural surveys. The international journal of organizational analysis 6:218–230CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Preston CC, Colman AM (2000) Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol 104:1–15CrossRef Preston CC, Colman AM (2000) Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol 104:1–15CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ministry of Health. Ethnicity code tables. 2010 Ministry of Health. Ethnicity code tables. 2010
16.
go back to reference MacKenzie R, Sims C, Owens RG, Dixon AK (1995) Patients’ perceptions of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol 50:137–143CrossRefPubMed MacKenzie R, Sims C, Owens RG, Dixon AK (1995) Patients’ perceptions of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol 50:137–143CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Flagg ER (2015) Survey-based assessment of patients’ understanding of their own imaging examinations. J Am Coll Radiol 12:549–555CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Flagg ER (2015) Survey-based assessment of patients’ understanding of their own imaging examinations. J Am Coll Radiol 12:549–555CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Keefe FJ, Hauck ER, Egert J, Rimer B, Kornguth P (1994) Mammography pain and discomfort: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. Pain 56:247–260CrossRefPubMed Keefe FJ, Hauck ER, Egert J, Rimer B, Kornguth P (1994) Mammography pain and discomfort: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. Pain 56:247–260CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Carlin LE, Smith HE, Henwood F (2014) To see or not to see: a qualitative interview study of patients’ views on their own diagnostic images. BMJ Open 4:e004999CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carlin LE, Smith HE, Henwood F (2014) To see or not to see: a qualitative interview study of patients’ views on their own diagnostic images. BMJ Open 4:e004999CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Devcich DA, Ellis CJ, Waltham N, Broadbent E, Petrie KJ (2014) Seeing what’s happening on the inside: patients’ views of the value of diagnostic cardiac computed tomography angiography. Br J Health Psychol 19:810–822CrossRefPubMed Devcich DA, Ellis CJ, Waltham N, Broadbent E, Petrie KJ (2014) Seeing what’s happening on the inside: patients’ views of the value of diagnostic cardiac computed tomography angiography. Br J Health Psychol 19:810–822CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sahbudin I, Bell J, Kumar K, Raza K, Filer A (2016) Observing real-time images during ultrasound-guided procedures improves patients’ experience. Rheumatology (Oxford) 55:585–586 Sahbudin I, Bell J, Kumar K, Raza K, Filer A (2016) Observing real-time images during ultrasound-guided procedures improves patients’ experience. Rheumatology (Oxford) 55:585–586
22.
go back to reference Joshua F, Bailey C, Marabani M, Romas E, White R, Wong P. Perceptions of Doppler ultrasound for rheumatoid arthritis disease activity assessment and education. Int J Rheum Dis 2017 Joshua F, Bailey C, Marabani M, Romas E, White R, Wong P. Perceptions of Doppler ultrasound for rheumatoid arthritis disease activity assessment and education. Int J Rheum Dis 2017
Metadata
Title
The patient experience of musculoskeletal imaging tests for investigation of inflammatory arthritis: a mixed-methods study
Authors
Sandra Bourke
William J. Taylor
Anthony J. Doyle
Merryn Gott
Nicola Dalbeth
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-017-3760-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Clinical Rheumatology 8/2018 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.