Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Protocol

The mechanical properties of the spinal cord: a protocol for a systematic review of previous testing procedures and results

Authors: Megan Stanners, Marguerite O’Riordan, Laura Hartley, Eirini Theodosiou, Jean-Baptiste Souppez, Adrian Gardner

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Spinal cord compression is a pathology seen in routine clinical practice. However, there remain a number of unanswered questions around both the understanding of the pathogenesis and the best method of treatment of the condition. This is partly due to the issues of the real-life testing of the physical properties of the spinal cord, either through the use of cadaveric human specimens or through animal testing, both of which have methodological, as well as ethical, issues.

Design and methods

This paper details a protocol for a systematic review of the literature on the mechanical properties of the spinal cord. We will conduct a literature search of a number of electronic databases, along with the grey literature, as a single-stage search. All literature will be screened for appropriate studies which will then be reviewed fully to extract relevant information on the methodology and mechanics of the reported testing along with the results. Two reviewers will separately screen and extract the data, with a comparison of results to ensure concordance. Conflicts will be resolved through discussion and independent arbitration as required. The methodological quality of the studies will be assessed within the ARRIVE guidelines using the CAMARADES framework and SYRCLE risk of bias tool. A narrative synthesis will be created with the appropriate tables to describe the demographics and findings of the included studies.

Discussion

The systematic review described here will form the basis of an understanding of the current literature around the physical properties of the spinal cord. This will allow future work to develop a physical model of the spinal cord, which is translatable to patients for analysis and testing in a controlled and repeatable fashion. Such a model would be the basis for further clinical research to improve outcomes from this condition.

Trial registration

Prospero registration number: CRD42022361933.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adigun O, Reddy V, Varacallo M. Anatomy, Back, Spinal Cord. [Updated 2022 Jul 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Accessed 15 Jan 2023. Adigun O, Reddy V, Varacallo M. Anatomy, Back, Spinal Cord. [Updated 2022 Jul 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Accessed 15 Jan 2023.
2.
go back to reference Jain A, Riew K, Rhee J, Cervical Myelopathy.In: Bridwell K, DeWald R, eitors. Bridwell and DeWald. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. 4th Edition. Wolters Kluwer 2020. p.243–254. Jain A, Riew K, Rhee J, Cervical Myelopathy.In: Bridwell K, DeWald R, eitors. Bridwell and DeWald. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. 4th Edition. Wolters Kluwer 2020. p.243–254.
3.
go back to reference Scheer J, Tang J, Smith J, Acosta F Jr, Protopsaltis T, Blondel B, et al. Cervical Spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implication: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19:141–59.CrossRefPubMed Scheer J, Tang J, Smith J, Acosta F Jr, Protopsaltis T, Blondel B, et al. Cervical Spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implication: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19:141–59.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ghogawala Z, Martin B, Benzel E, Dziura J, Magge S, Abbed K, et al. Comparative effectiveness of ventral versus dorsal surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:622–30.CrossRefPubMed Ghogawala Z, Martin B, Benzel E, Dziura J, Magge S, Abbed K, et al. Comparative effectiveness of ventral versus dorsal surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:622–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lawrence B, Jacobs W, Norvell D, Hermsmeyer J, Chapman J, Brodke D. Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine. 2013;38:S173–82.CrossRefPubMed Lawrence B, Jacobs W, Norvell D, Hermsmeyer J, Chapman J, Brodke D. Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine. 2013;38:S173–82.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Montano N, Riccardi L, Olivi A. Comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:530-536.e2.CrossRefPubMed Montano N, Riccardi L, Olivi A. Comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:530-536.e2.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hung T-K, Chang G-L, Chang J-L, Albin MS. Stress-strain relationship and neurological sequelae of uniaxial elongation of the spinal cord of cats. Surg Neurol. 1981;15,:471–476. Hung T-K, Chang G-L, Chang J-L, Albin MS. Stress-strain relationship and neurological sequelae of uniaxial elongation of the spinal cord of cats. Surg Neurol. 1981;15,:471–476.
9.
go back to reference Ichihara K, Taguchi T, Shimada Y, Sakuramoto I, Kawano S, Kawai S. Gray matter of the bovine cervical spinal cord is mechanically more rigid and fragile than the white matter. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18:361–7.CrossRefPubMed Ichihara K, Taguchi T, Shimada Y, Sakuramoto I, Kawano S, Kawai S. Gray matter of the bovine cervical spinal cord is mechanically more rigid and fragile than the white matter. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18:361–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fiford R, Bilston LE. The mechanical properties of rat spinal cord in vitro. J Biomech. 2005;38:1509–15.CrossRefPubMed Fiford R, Bilston LE. The mechanical properties of rat spinal cord in vitro. J Biomech. 2005;38:1509–15.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Maikos J, Elias R, Shreiber D. Mechanical properties of dura mater from the rat brain and spinal cord. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:38–51.CrossRefPubMed Maikos J, Elias R, Shreiber D. Mechanical properties of dura mater from the rat brain and spinal cord. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:38–51.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Clarke E, Cheng S, Bilston L. The mechanical properties of neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro, and comparisons with adult. J Biomech. 2009;42:1397–402.CrossRefPubMed Clarke E, Cheng S, Bilston L. The mechanical properties of neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro, and comparisons with adult. J Biomech. 2009;42:1397–402.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Luna C, Detrick L, Shah S, Cohen A, Aranda-Espinoza H. Mechanical properties of the lamprey spinal cord: uniaxial loading and physiological strain. J Biomech. 2013;46:2194–200.CrossRefPubMed Luna C, Detrick L, Shah S, Cohen A, Aranda-Espinoza H. Mechanical properties of the lamprey spinal cord: uniaxial loading and physiological strain. J Biomech. 2013;46:2194–200.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Rethlefsen M, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala A, Moher D, Page M, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;26:39.CrossRef Rethlefsen M, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala A, Moher D, Page M, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;26:39.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Percie du Sert N, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, et al. Reporting animal research: explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:e3000411 Percie du Sert N, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, et al. Reporting animal research: explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:e3000411
17.
go back to reference Macleod M, O’Collins T, Howells D, Donnan G. Pooling of animal experimental data reveals influence of study design and publication bias. Stroke. 2004;35:1203–8.CrossRefPubMed Macleod M, O’Collins T, Howells D, Donnan G. Pooling of animal experimental data reveals influence of study design and publication bias. Stroke. 2004;35:1203–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hooijmans C, Rovers M, de Vries R, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam M. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methods. 2014;14:43.CrossRef Hooijmans C, Rovers M, de Vries R, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam M. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methods. 2014;14:43.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Campbell M, McKensie J, Sowden A, Katikireddi S, Brennan S, Ellis S, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368: l6890.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell M, McKensie J, Sowden A, Katikireddi S, Brennan S, Ellis S, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368: l6890.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Harrow-Mortelliti M, Reddy V, Jimsheleishvili G. Physiology, Spinal Cord. [Updated 2022 Jan 29]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Accessed 15 Jan 2023. Harrow-Mortelliti M, Reddy V, Jimsheleishvili G. Physiology, Spinal Cord. [Updated 2022 Jan 29]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Accessed 15 Jan 2023.
26.
go back to reference Tu, Castillo. Das, Diwan. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Insights into its pathobiology and molecular mechanisms. J Chin Med. 2021;10:1214. Tu, Castillo. Das, Diwan. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Insights into its pathobiology and molecular mechanisms. J Chin Med. 2021;10:1214.
27.
go back to reference Anjum A, Yazid M, Daud M, Idris J, Ng A, Naicker A, et al. Spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, multi molecular interactions and underlying recovery mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anjum A, Yazid M, Daud M, Idris J, Ng A, Naicker A, et al. Spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, multi molecular interactions and underlying recovery mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The mechanical properties of the spinal cord: a protocol for a systematic review of previous testing procedures and results
Authors
Megan Stanners
Marguerite O’Riordan
Laura Hartley
Eirini Theodosiou
Jean-Baptiste Souppez
Adrian Gardner
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02417-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Systematic Reviews 1/2024 Go to the issue