Top

Published in:

01-05-2011 | Clinical Article

The impact of subdural air collection on intraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potentials: fact or myth?

Authors: Marcus André Acioly, Florian H. Ebner, Till K. Hauser, Marina Liebsch, Carlos Henrique Carvalho, Alireza Gharabaghi, Marcos Tatagiba

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 5/2011

Abstract

Background

Surgery in the semi-sitting position is susceptible to changes in motor (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), which are not related to neurological impairment. These changes have been suggested to be caused by the insulating effect of subdural air collection. This study sought to investigate the correlation of MEP and SEP final-to-baseline amplitude ratios to postoperative volumetry of frontoparietal subdural air collection.

Methods

Median nerve SEP and hand MEP findings of 47 patients operated on in the semi-sitting position were compared with 7 patients operated on in the supine position. Computed tomography was routinely performed on the 1st postoperative day in all patients, and subdural air volumetry was calculated. Final-to-baseline MEP and SEP amplitude ratios were calculated and correlated to subdural air volumetry.

Findings

SEP changed in 12 patients, and MEP changed in 7 patients. Postoperative subdural air collections were significantly different between the groups (semi-sitting group, mean 31.2 cm³; supine group, mean 2 cm³; p = 0.000). For the SEP ratios, a moderate negative correlation with subdural volumetry was found in the semi-sitting group (p = 0.044). Conversely, there was no correlation in the subset of patients with SEP attenuation (p = 0.846). As concerns the MEP ratios, no correlation was demonstrated in any group (semi-sitting, p = 0.967; supine, p = 0.193).

Conclusions

Although SEP amplitude reductions were associated with large subdural air collections, this was not observed in the subset of patients with SEP attenuation and for the MEP monitoring, suggesting other pathophysiological mechanisms, such as brain shift, for the artificial amplitude reduction.

Acioly MA, Liebsch M, Carvalho CH, Gharabaghi A, Tatagiba M (2010) Transcranial electrocortical stimulation to monitor the facial nerve motor function during cerebellopontine angle surgery. Neurosurgery 66:ONS354–ONS362CrossRef

Black PM (2000) Quantification of, visualization of, and compensation for brain shift using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 47:1079CrossRef

Dorward NL, Alberti O, Velani B, Gerritsen FA, Harkness WF, Kitchen ND, Thomas DG (1998) Postimaging brain distortion: magnitude, correlates, and impact on neuronavigation. J Neurosurg 88:656–662PubMedCrossRef

Gröschel K, Hauser TK, Luft A, Patronas N, Dichgans J, Litvan I, Schulz JB (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetry differentiates progressive supranuclear palsy from corticobasal degeneration. Neuroimage 21:714–724PubMedCrossRef

Hauser TK, Luft A, Skalej M, Nägele T, Kircher TT, Leube DT, Schulz JB (2006) Visualization and quantification of disease progression in multiple system atrophy. Mov Disord 21:1674–1681PubMedCrossRef

Hill DL, Maurer CR Jr, Maciunas RJ, Barwise JA, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY (1998) Measurement of intraoperative brain surface deformation under a craniotomy. Neurosurgery 43:514–528PubMedCrossRef

Kombos T, Suess O, Pietilä T, Brock M (2000) Subdural air limits the elicitation of compound muscle action potentials by high-frequency transcranial electrical stimulation. Br J Neurosurg 14:240–243PubMedCrossRef

Levy WJ Jr (1987) Clinical experience with motor and cerebellar evoked potential monitoring. Neurosurgery 20:169–182PubMed

Lunsford LD, Maroon JC, Sheptak PE, Albin MS (1979) Subdural tension pneumocephalus. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 50:525–527PubMedCrossRef

10.

Lyon R, Feiner J, Lieberman JA (2005) Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia: the phenomenon of “anesthetic fade”. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 17:13–19PubMed

11.

MacDonald DB (2006) Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update. J Clin Monit Comput 20:347–377PubMedCrossRef

12.

McPherson RW, Toung TJ, Johnson RM, Rosenbaum AE, Wang H (1985) Intracranial subdural gas: a cause of false-positive change of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential. Anesthesiology 62:816–819PubMedCrossRef

13.

Neuloh G, Schramm J (2002) Intraoperative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring for supratentorial procedures. In: Deletis V, Shils JL (eds) Neurophysiology in neurosurgery: a modern intraoperative approach. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 339–401CrossRef

14.

Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Cerny S, Hastreiter P, Greiner G, Fahlbusch R (2000) Quantification of, visualization of, and compensation for brain shift using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 47:1070–1080PubMedCrossRef

15.

Nornes H, Magnaes B (1971) Supratentorial epidural pressure recorded during posterior fossa surgery. J Neurosurg 35:541–549PubMedCrossRef

16.

Paisansathan C, Koenig HM, Wheeler PJ, Baughman VL, Hoffman WE (2003) Loss of SSEP during sitting craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 15:327–329PubMedCrossRef

17.

Porter JM, Pidgeon C, Cunningham AJ (1999) The sitting position in neurosurgery: a critical appraisal. Br J Anaesth 82:117–128PubMed

18.

Reinges MH, Nguyen HH, Krings T, Hütter BO, Rohde V, Gilsbach JM (2004) Course of brain shift during microsurgical resection of supratentorial cerebral lesions: limits of conventional neuronavigation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146:369–377CrossRef

19.

Sala F, Manganotti P, Tramontano V, Bricolo A, Gerosa M (2007) Monitoring of motor pathways during brain stem surgery: what we have achieved and what we still miss? Neurophysiol Clin 37:399–406PubMedCrossRef

20.

Schramm J, Watanabe E, Strauss C, Fahlbusch R (1989) Neurophysiologic monitoring in posterior fossa surgery. I. Technical principles, applicability and limitations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 98:9–18CrossRef

21.

Schubert A, Zornow MH, Drummond JC, Rosenbaum AE, Wang H (1986) Loss of cortical evoked responses due to intracranial gas during posterior fossa craniectomy in the seated position. Anesth Analg 65:203–206PubMedCrossRef

22.

Sloan T (2010) The incidence, volume, absorption, and timing of supratentorial pneumocephalus during posterior fossa neurosurgery conducted in the sitting position. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 22:59–66PubMedCrossRef

23.

Suess O, Kombos T, Suess S, Stendel R, Pietilae T, Brock M (2001) The influence of intra-operative brain shift on continuous cortical stimulation during surgery in the motor cortex—an illustrative case report. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:621–623CrossRef

24.

Suess O, Kombos T, Ciklatekerlio O, Stendel R, Suess S, Brock M (2002) Impact of brain shift on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring with cortical strip electrodes. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:1279–1289CrossRef

25.

Tatagiba M, Acioly MA (2008) Retrosigmoid approach to the posterior and middle fossae. In: Ramina R, Pires Aguiar PH, Tatagiba M (eds) Samii’s Essentials in Neurosurgery. Springer, Stuttgart, pp 137–154CrossRef

26.

Toung TJ, McPherson RW, Ahn H, Donham RT, Alano J, Long D (1986) Pneumocephalus: effects of patient position on the incidence and location of aerocele after posterior fossa and upper cervical cord surgery. Anesth Analg 65:65–70PubMed

27.

Watanabe E, Schramm J, Schneider W (1989) Effect of a subdural air collection on the sensory evoked potential during surgery in the sitting position. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 74:194–201PubMedCrossRef

28.

Wiedemayer H, Schaefer H, Armbruster W, Miller M, Stolke D (2002) Observations on intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring in the semi-sitting position. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1993–1997PubMedCrossRef

29.

Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Regel J, Armbruster W, Schaefer H, Stolke D (2003) Enhanced stability of somatosensory evoked potentials attained in the median nerve by using temporal electrodes for intraoperative recording in patients in the semisitting position. J Neurosurg 99:986–990PubMedCrossRef

30.

Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Armbruster W, Regel J, Schaefer H, Stolke D (2004) False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:280–286PubMed

31.

Zhou HH, Kelly PJ (2001) Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumour resection. Neurosurgery 48:1075–1081PubMedCrossRef

Title: The impact of subdural air collection on intraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potentials: fact or myth?
Authors: Marcus André Acioly
Florian H. Ebner
Till K. Hauser
Marina Liebsch
Carlos Henrique Carvalho
Alireza Gharabaghi
Marcos Tatagiba
Publication date: 01-05-2011
Publisher: Springer Vienna
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-0960-2

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

The impact of subdural air collection on intraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potentials: fact or myth?

Abstract

Background

Methods

Findings

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Findings

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Isolated facial palsy as a hallmark of CSF overdrainage in shunted intracranial arachnoid cyst

Long-segment percutaneous fixation: various rather than proper indications

Bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation using single track microelectrode recording

Cryoneurolysis for zygapophyseal joint pain: a retrospective analysis of 117 interventions

Harvey Cushing’s case series of trigeminal neuralgia at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a surgeon’s quest to advance the treatment of the ‘suicide disease’

Restenosis after endovascular PTA/stenting for supra-aortic branches in Takayasu aortitis: report of three cases and review of the literature