Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Article

The impact of automated screening with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) on health-related quality of life, supportive care needs, and patient satisfaction with care in 268 ambulatory cancer patients

Authors: Benjamin D. Diplock, Kaitlin M. C. McGarragle, Willem A. Mueller, Sana Haddad, Rachel Ehrlich, Dong-Hyun A. Yoon, Xingshan Cao, Yaseen Al-Allaq, Paul Karanicolas, Margaret I. Fitch, Jeff Myers, Alex J. Mitchell, Janet W. M. Ellis

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to assess the impact of implementing Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) screening on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient satisfaction with care (PSC) in ambulatory oncology patients. ESAS is now a standard of care in Ontario cancer centers, with the goal of improving symptom management in cancer patients, yet few studies examine impact of ESAS on patient outcomes.

Methods

We compared ambulatory oncology patients who were not screened prior to ESAS site implementation (2011–2012), to a similar group who were screened using ESAS after site implementation (2012–2013), to examine between-group differences in patient HRQoL, PSC outcomes, and supportive care needs (Supportive Care Service Survey). Both no-ESAS (n = 160) and ESAS (n = 108) groups completed these measures: the latter completing them, along with ESAS, at baseline and 2 weeks later.

Results

After assessing the impact of implementing ESAS, by matching for potentially confounding variables and conducting univariate analyses, no significant between-group differences were found in HRQoL or PSC. There was significant improvement in symptoms of nausea/vomiting and constipation, after 2 weeks. Lower symptom burden with decreased ESAS scores was significantly correlated with increased HRQoL. There were no between-group differences in knowledge of/access to supportive care.

Conclusions

Significant correlation between change in ESAS and HRQoL implies ESAS could usefully inform healthcare providers about need to respond to changes in symptom and functioning between visits. This study showed no impact of early-ESAS screening on HRQoL or PSC. Further research should explore how to better utilize ESAS screening, to improve communication, symptom management, and HRQoL.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Advisory CCSs, Statistics CoC (2015) Canadian Cancer Statistics 2015 Special topic: predictions of the future burden of cancer in Canada. Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto Advisory CCSs, Statistics CoC (2015) Canadian Cancer Statistics 2015 Special topic: predictions of the future burden of cancer in Canada. Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto
5.
go back to reference Steel JL, Geller DA, Gamblin TC, Olek MC, Carr BI (2007) Depression, immunity, and survival in patients with hepatobiliary carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 25(17):2397–2405CrossRefPubMed Steel JL, Geller DA, Gamblin TC, Olek MC, Carr BI (2007) Depression, immunity, and survival in patients with hepatobiliary carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 25(17):2397–2405CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, Krupnick JL, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Bower JE, Belin TR (2004) Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(5):376–387CrossRefPubMed Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, Krupnick JL, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Bower JE, Belin TR (2004) Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(5):376–387CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Carlson LE, Bultz BD (2003) Cancer distress screening. Needs, models, and methods. J Psychosom Res 55(5):403–409CrossRefPubMed Carlson LE, Bultz BD (2003) Cancer distress screening. Needs, models, and methods. J Psychosom Res 55(5):403–409CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fitch M (2000) Supportive care for cancer patients. Hosp Q 3(4):39–46PubMed Fitch M (2000) Supportive care for cancer patients. Hosp Q 3(4):39–46PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bultz BD, Waller A, Cullum J, Jones P, Halland J, Groff SL, Leckie C, Shirt L, Blanchard S, Lau H, Easaw J, Fassbender K, Carlson LE (2013) Implementing routine screening for distress, the sixth vital sign, for patients with head and neck and neurologic cancers. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 11(10):1249–1261CrossRef Bultz BD, Waller A, Cullum J, Jones P, Halland J, Groff SL, Leckie C, Shirt L, Blanchard S, Lau H, Easaw J, Fassbender K, Carlson LE (2013) Implementing routine screening for distress, the sixth vital sign, for patients with head and neck and neurologic cancers. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 11(10):1249–1261CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M (2000) Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer 88(9):2164–2171CrossRefPubMed Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M (2000) Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer 88(9):2164–2171CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7(2):6–9PubMed Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7(2):6–9PubMed
20.
go back to reference Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K, Liberty J (2015) Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Annals of Oncology Advance Access Published April at Massachusetts General Hospital Treadwell Library on, 17. Retrieved from http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/ Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K, Liberty J (2015) Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Annals of Oncology Advance Access Published April at Massachusetts General Hospital Treadwell Library on, 17. Retrieved from http://​annonc.​oxfordjournals.​org/​
21.
go back to reference Bakitas M, Lyons KD, Hegel MT, Balan S, Brokaw FC, Seville J, Hull JG, Li Z, Tosteson TD, Byock IR (2009) Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302(7):741–749CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bakitas M, Lyons KD, Hegel MT, Balan S, Brokaw FC, Seville J, Hull JG, Li Z, Tosteson TD, Byock IR (2009) Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302(7):741–749CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Street RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM (2009) How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 74(3):295–301CrossRefPubMed Street RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM (2009) How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 74(3):295–301CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Epstein RM, Street JR RL (2007) Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. NIH Publication No. 07-6225. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda Epstein RM, Street JR RL (2007) Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. NIH Publication No. 07-6225. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
24.
go back to reference Winefield HR, Murrell TG, Clifford J (1995) Process and outcomes in general practice consultations: problems in defining high quality care. Soc Sci Med 41(7):969–975CrossRefPubMed Winefield HR, Murrell TG, Clifford J (1995) Process and outcomes in general practice consultations: problems in defining high quality care. Soc Sci Med 41(7):969–975CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW (2013) The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med 368(3):201–203CrossRefPubMed Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW (2013) The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med 368(3):201–203CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Richardson LA, Jones GW (2009) A review of the reliability and validity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. Curr Oncol 16(1):55PubMedPubMedCentral Richardson LA, Jones GW (2009) A review of the reliability and validity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. Curr Oncol 16(1):55PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Garyali A, Palmer JL, Yennurajalingam S, Zhang T, Pace EA, Bruera E (2006) Errors in symptom intensity self-assessment by patients receiving outpatient palliative care. J Palliat Med 9(5):1059–1065CrossRefPubMed Garyali A, Palmer JL, Yennurajalingam S, Zhang T, Pace EA, Bruera E (2006) Errors in symptom intensity self-assessment by patients receiving outpatient palliative care. J Palliat Med 9(5):1059–1065CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bagha S, Macedo A, Jacks L, Lo C, Zimmermann C, Rodin G, Li M (2013) The utility of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in screening for anxiety and depression. Eur J Cancer Care 22(1):60–69CrossRef Bagha S, Macedo A, Jacks L, Lo C, Zimmermann C, Rodin G, Li M (2013) The utility of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in screening for anxiety and depression. Eur J Cancer Care 22(1):60–69CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Watanabe S, Nekolaichuk C, Beaumont C, Mawani A (2009) The Edmonton symptom assessment system—what do patients think? Support Care Cancer 17(6):675–683CrossRefPubMed Watanabe S, Nekolaichuk C, Beaumont C, Mawani A (2009) The Edmonton symptom assessment system—what do patients think? Support Care Cancer 17(6):675–683CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Davison SN, Jhangri GS, Johnson JA (2006) Longitudinal validation of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS) in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21(11):3189–3195CrossRefPubMed Davison SN, Jhangri GS, Johnson JA (2006) Longitudinal validation of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS) in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21(11):3189–3195CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Ringdal GI, Ringdal K (1993) Testing the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire on cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses. Qual Life Res 2(2):129–140CrossRefPubMed Ringdal GI, Ringdal K (1993) Testing the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire on cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses. Qual Life Res 2(2):129–140CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Poinsot R, Altmeyer A, Conroy T, Savignoni A, Asselain B, Leonard I, Marx E, Cosquer M, Sevellec M, Gledhill J, Rodary C, Mercier M, Dickes P, Fabbro M, Antoine P, Guerif S, Schraub S, Dolbeault S, Bredart A (2006) Multisite validation study of questionnaire assessing out-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire in ambulatory chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment. Bull Cancer 93(3):315–327PubMed Poinsot R, Altmeyer A, Conroy T, Savignoni A, Asselain B, Leonard I, Marx E, Cosquer M, Sevellec M, Gledhill J, Rodary C, Mercier M, Dickes P, Fabbro M, Antoine P, Guerif S, Schraub S, Dolbeault S, Bredart A (2006) Multisite validation study of questionnaire assessing out-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire in ambulatory chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment. Bull Cancer 93(3):315–327PubMed
39.
go back to reference Database OCSMR (2010) Symptom severity for patients with all typers of cancer, all reporting regional cancer centres, 2015 Database OCSMR (2010) Symptom severity for patients with all typers of cancer, all reporting regional cancer centres, 2015
43.
go back to reference Gill A, Daines P, Selby D (2010) What do symptom scores mean: observations on discrepancies when defining symptoms using words and numbers. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14(5):435–438CrossRefPubMed Gill A, Daines P, Selby D (2010) What do symptom scores mean: observations on discrepancies when defining symptoms using words and numbers. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14(5):435–438CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The impact of automated screening with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) on health-related quality of life, supportive care needs, and patient satisfaction with care in 268 ambulatory cancer patients
Authors
Benjamin D. Diplock
Kaitlin M. C. McGarragle
Willem A. Mueller
Sana Haddad
Rachel Ehrlich
Dong-Hyun A. Yoon
Xingshan Cao
Yaseen Al-Allaq
Paul Karanicolas
Margaret I. Fitch
Jeff Myers
Alex J. Mitchell
Janet W. M. Ellis
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4304-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine