Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Article

Couples’ symptom burden in oncology care: perception of self and the other

Authors: Gabriel Lopez, Kathrin Milbury, Minxing Chen, Yisheng Li, Eduardo Bruera, Lorenzo Cohen

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The literature suggests that psychological distress and quality of life are interdependent in couples coping with cancer. The current study seeks to extend these findings to physical symptom burden, examining differences in symptom self-rating and perception of partner symptoms.

Methods

Couples were approached while waiting for an integrative oncology service. Fifty patients and their partners completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-FS; twelve symptoms, scores 0–10, 10 worst possible) and a Global Health measure (PROMIS10). Patient and partner each also completed the ESAS-FS as it related to their perception of the other’s symptoms. ESAS distress subscales analyzed included Global (GDS), Psychosocial (PSS), and Physical (PHS). Analyses included paired t tests to examine all measures.

Results

Fifty-eight percent of patients were female with most common cancer diagnoses of breast (22%), gastrointestinal (16%), and thoracic/H&N (16%). For ESAS-FS self-ratings, patients had significantly higher physical distress than partners, with a no significant difference in psychosocial distress. For PROMIS10 self-ratings, patients reported significantly lower global health and physical health, (p’s < 0.001); no differences were found for mental health between patients and caregivers. Patient rating of partner physical distress (PHS, p = 0.01) was significantly higher than partner self-rating, with no significant difference observed in ratings for psychosocial distress. Partner rating of patient psychosocial distress (PSS, p < 0.001) and physical distress (PHS, p = 0.001) was significantly higher than that of patient self-rating.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that both patients and partners perceive physical distress of the other higher than self; however, patients may be more sensitive to psychosocial distress in their partners.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deshields TL, Potter P, Olsen S, Liu J (2014) The persistence of symptom burden: symptom experience and quality of life of cancer patients across one year. Support Care Cancer 22(4):1089–1096CrossRefPubMed Deshields TL, Potter P, Olsen S, Liu J (2014) The persistence of symptom burden: symptom experience and quality of life of cancer patients across one year. Support Care Cancer 22(4):1089–1096CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kim JEE, Dodd MJ, Aouizerat BE et al (2009) A review of the prevalence and impact of multiple symptoms in oncology patients. JPSM 37(4):715–736 Kim JEE, Dodd MJ, Aouizerat BE et al (2009) A review of the prevalence and impact of multiple symptoms in oncology patients. JPSM 37(4):715–736
3.
go back to reference Girgis A, Lambert S, Johnson C et al (2013) Physical, psychosocial, and economic burden of caring for people with cancer: a review. JOP 9(4):197–202CrossRefPubMed Girgis A, Lambert S, Johnson C et al (2013) Physical, psychosocial, and economic burden of caring for people with cancer: a review. JOP 9(4):197–202CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schulz R, Beach SR (1999) Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 282(23):2215–2219CrossRefPubMed Schulz R, Beach SR (1999) Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 282(23):2215–2219CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Dueck AC, et al. (2014) Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 106(7) Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Dueck AC, et al. (2014) Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 106(7)
6.
go back to reference Tanco K, Vidal M, Joseph AA et al (2018) Testing the feasibility of using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) to assess caregiver symptom burden. Palliative and Supportive Care 16(1):14–22CrossRefPubMed Tanco K, Vidal M, Joseph AA et al (2018) Testing the feasibility of using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) to assess caregiver symptom burden. Palliative and Supportive Care 16(1):14–22CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kurtz JC, Given CC et al (1996) Concordance of cancer patient and caregiver symptom reports. Cancer Pract 4(4):185–190PubMed Kurtz JC, Given CC et al (1996) Concordance of cancer patient and caregiver symptom reports. Cancer Pract 4(4):185–190PubMed
8.
go back to reference Yeşilbalkan OU, Okgün A (2010) Patients’ self reports and caregivers’ perception of symptoms in Turkish cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14(2):119–124CrossRefPubMed Yeşilbalkan OU, Okgün A (2010) Patients’ self reports and caregivers’ perception of symptoms in Turkish cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14(2):119–124CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lobchuk MM, Kristjanson L, Degner L et al (1997) Perceptions of symptom distress in lung cancer patients: I. Congruence between patients and primary family caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manag 14(3):136–146CrossRef Lobchuk MM, Kristjanson L, Degner L et al (1997) Perceptions of symptom distress in lung cancer patients: I. Congruence between patients and primary family caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manag 14(3):136–146CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Litzelman K, Green PA, Yabroff KR (2016) Cancer and quality of life in spousal dyads: spillover in couples with and without cancer-related health problems. Support Care Cancer 24(2):763–771CrossRefPubMed Litzelman K, Green PA, Yabroff KR (2016) Cancer and quality of life in spousal dyads: spillover in couples with and without cancer-related health problems. Support Care Cancer 24(2):763–771CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Milne DJ, Mulder LL, Beelen HC et al (2006) Patients’ self-report and family caregivers’ perception of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: how do they compare? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 15(2):125–132CrossRef Milne DJ, Mulder LL, Beelen HC et al (2006) Patients’ self-report and family caregivers’ perception of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: how do they compare? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 15(2):125–132CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nekolaichuk CL, Maguire TO, Suarez-Almazor M, Rogers WT, Bruera E (1999) Assessing the reliability of patient, nurse, and family caregiver symptom ratings in hospitalized advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 17(11):3621–3630CrossRefPubMed Nekolaichuk CL, Maguire TO, Suarez-Almazor M, Rogers WT, Bruera E (1999) Assessing the reliability of patient, nurse, and family caregiver symptom ratings in hospitalized advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 17(11):3621–3630CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Silveira MJ, Given CW, Given B, Rosland AM, Piette JD (2010) Patient-caregiver concordance in symptom assessment and improvement in outcomes for patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Chronic Illn 6(1):46–56CrossRefPubMed Silveira MJ, Given CW, Given B, Rosland AM, Piette JD (2010) Patient-caregiver concordance in symptom assessment and improvement in outcomes for patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Chronic Illn 6(1):46–56CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ et al (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6PubMed Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ et al (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D (2009) Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res 18(7):873–880CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D (2009) Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res 18(7):873–880CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Lopez G, McQuade J, Cohen L, Williams JT, Spelman AR, Fellman B, Li Y, Bruera E, Lee RT (2017) Integrative oncology physician consultations at a comprehensive cancer center: analysis of demographic, clinical and patient reported outcomes. J Cancer 8(3):395–402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lopez G, McQuade J, Cohen L, Williams JT, Spelman AR, Fellman B, Li Y, Bruera E, Lee RT (2017) Integrative oncology physician consultations at a comprehensive cancer center: analysis of demographic, clinical and patient reported outcomes. J Cancer 8(3):395–402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Lopez G, Liu W, Milbury K, Spelman A, Wei Q, Bruera E, Cohen L (2017) The effects of oncology massage on symptom self-report for cancer patients and their caregivers. Support Care Cancer 25:3645–3650CrossRefPubMed Lopez G, Liu W, Milbury K, Spelman A, Wei Q, Bruera E, Cohen L (2017) The effects of oncology massage on symptom self-report for cancer patients and their caregivers. Support Care Cancer 25:3645–3650CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yennurajalingam S, Urbauer DL, Casper KLB, Reyes-Gibby CC, Chacko R, Poulter V, Bruera E (2011) Impact of a palliative care consultation team on cancer-related symptoms in advanced cancer patients referred to an outpatient supportive care clinic. J Pain Symptom Manag 41(1):49–56CrossRef Yennurajalingam S, Urbauer DL, Casper KLB, Reyes-Gibby CC, Chacko R, Poulter V, Bruera E (2011) Impact of a palliative care consultation team on cancer-related symptoms in advanced cancer patients referred to an outpatient supportive care clinic. J Pain Symptom Manag 41(1):49–56CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Couples’ symptom burden in oncology care: perception of self and the other
Authors
Gabriel Lopez
Kathrin Milbury
Minxing Chen
Yisheng Li
Eduardo Bruera
Lorenzo Cohen
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4298-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine