Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Original Scientific Report

The Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Anal Function Following Intersphincteric Resection

Authors: Mitsuru Yokota, Masaaki Ito, Yuji Nishizawa, Akihiro Kobayashi, Norio Saito

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Data regarding anastomotic leakage (AL) following intersphincteric resection (ISR) are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the effect of AL on anal function in a retrospective review of patients who developed AL following ISR.

Methods

We evaluated 341 consecutive patients who underwent ISR between 2000 and 2012. Patients were classified into three groups: anastomotic dehiscence (AD), major AL (Clavien–Dindo grade III+), or control (<grade III or no AL). Functional assessment was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after defecation through the preserved anus, and the Wexner score was calculated.

Results

Among patients who underwent ISR for low rectal cancer (anal verge, 3.7 ± 1.3 cm), 59 (17%) developed AL. Of these, 13 patients were classified as AD and 36 as major AL. The rate of the 3-year stomal reversal was significantly lower in the major AL (78.6%) and AD groups (61.5%) than in the control group (88.7%; p < 0.01). Furthermore, the anastomotic stricture rate was higher in the AL and AD groups than in the controls (16.7 and 38.5 vs. 1.8%, respectively; p < 0.01). Wexner scores in the major AL group were poor during the early period, but were similar to the control group at the 2-year follow-up. In contrast, Wexner scores in the AD group remained high, even after 2 years.

Conclusions

Patients with major AL following ISR had poor anal function that recovered over 2 years, as long as AD was not present. These findings suggest that patients with major AL require a long-term follow-up for anal function.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:603–612CrossRefPubMed Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:603–612CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ito M, Saito N, Sugito M et al (2009) Analysis of clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:64–70CrossRefPubMed Ito M, Saito N, Sugito M et al (2009) Analysis of clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:64–70CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A et al (2014) Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:3608–3615CrossRefPubMed Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A et al (2014) Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:3608–3615CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725CrossRefPubMed Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F et al (2007) Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg 94:1548–1554CrossRefPubMed Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F et al (2007) Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg 94:1548–1554CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K et al (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253:890–899CrossRefPubMed Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K et al (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253:890–899CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M et al (2004) Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:459–466CrossRefPubMed Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M et al (2004) Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:459–466CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Saito N, Moriya Y, Shirouzu K et al (2006) Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Dis Colon Rectum 49:S13–S22CrossRefPubMed Saito N, Moriya Y, Shirouzu K et al (2006) Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Dis Colon Rectum 49:S13–S22CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Osera S, Ikematsu H, Odagaki T et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign severe anastomotic stricture after surgery for lower rectal cancer (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 81:770–773CrossRefPubMed Osera S, Ikematsu H, Odagaki T et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign severe anastomotic stricture after surgery for lower rectal cancer (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 81:770–773CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M et al (2011) Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:963–968CrossRefPubMed Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M et al (2011) Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:963–968CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404CrossRefPubMed Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 83:60–62CrossRefPubMed Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 83:60–62CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Merkel S et al (2003) Does anastomotic leakage affect functional outcome after rectal resection for cancer? Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:406–410PubMed Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Merkel S et al (2003) Does anastomotic leakage affect functional outcome after rectal resection for cancer? Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:406–410PubMed
16.
go back to reference Carmona JA, Ortiz H, Perez-Cabanas I (1991) Alterations in anorectal function after anterior resection for cancer of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 6:108–110CrossRefPubMed Carmona JA, Ortiz H, Perez-Cabanas I (1991) Alterations in anorectal function after anterior resection for cancer of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 6:108–110CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97CrossRefPubMed Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Devroede G, Vobecky S, Masse S et al (1982) Ischemic fecal incontinence and rectal angina. Gastroenterology 83:970–980PubMed Devroede G, Vobecky S, Masse S et al (1982) Ischemic fecal incontinence and rectal angina. Gastroenterology 83:970–980PubMed
19.
go back to reference Rajasekaran MR, Sinha S, Seo Y et al (2014) Myoarchitectural and functional alterations in rabbit external anal sphincter muscle following experimental surgical trauma. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 307:G445–G451CrossRefPubMed Rajasekaran MR, Sinha S, Seo Y et al (2014) Myoarchitectural and functional alterations in rabbit external anal sphincter muscle following experimental surgical trauma. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 307:G445–G451CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ashburn JH, Stocchi L, Kiran RP et al (2013) Consequences of anastomotic leak after restorative proctectomy for cancer: effect on long-term function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 56:275–280CrossRefPubMed Ashburn JH, Stocchi L, Kiran RP et al (2013) Consequences of anastomotic leak after restorative proctectomy for cancer: effect on long-term function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 56:275–280CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL et al (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358CrossRefPubMed Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL et al (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS et al (2009) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg 209:694–701CrossRefPubMed Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS et al (2009) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg 209:694–701CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J et al (2005) Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 7:51–57CrossRefPubMed Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J et al (2005) Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 7:51–57CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A et al (2008) Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:703–707CrossRefPubMed Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A et al (2008) Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:703–707CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S et al (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 14(1):104–111CrossRefPubMed Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S et al (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 14(1):104–111CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Koyama M, Murata A, Sakamoto Y et al (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after intersphincteric resection without a protective defunctioning stoma for lower rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:249–256CrossRef Koyama M, Murata A, Sakamoto Y et al (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after intersphincteric resection without a protective defunctioning stoma for lower rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:249–256CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K et al (2015) Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 220:186–194CrossRefPubMed Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K et al (2015) Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 220:186–194CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Anal Function Following Intersphincteric Resection
Authors
Mitsuru Yokota
Masaaki Ito
Yuji Nishizawa
Akihiro Kobayashi
Norio Saito
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3960-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

World Journal of Surgery 8/2017 Go to the issue