Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

The impact of a regionally based translational cancer research collaborative in Australia using the FAIT methodology

Authors: Christine L. Paul, Nicole M. Verrills, Stephen Ackland, Rodney Scott, Susan Goode, Ann Thomas, Sarah Lukeman, Sarah Nielsen, Judith Weidenhofer, James Lynam, Elizabeth A. Fradgley, Jarad Martin, Peter Greer, Stephen Smith, Cassandra Griffin, Kelly A. Avery-Kiejda, Nick Zdenkowski, Andrew Searles, Shanthi Ramanathan

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Translating research, achieving impact, and assessing impact are important aspirations for all research collaboratives but can prove challenging. The Hunter Cancer Research Alliance (HCRA) was funded from 2014 to 2021 to enhance capacity and productivity in cancer research in a regional centre in Australia. This study aimed to assess the impact and benefit of the HCRA to help inform future research investments of this type.

Method

The Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) was selected as the preferred methodology. FAIT incorporates three validated methodologies for assessing impact: 1) Modified Payback; 2) Economic Analysis; and 3) Narrative overview and case studies. All three FAIT methods are underpinned by a Program Logic Model. Data were collected from HCRA and the University of Newcastle administrative records, directly from HCRA members, and website searches.

Results

In addition to advancing knowledge and providing capacity building support to members via grants, fellowships, scholarships, training, events and targeted translation support, key impacts of HCRA-member research teams included: (i) the establishment of a regional biobank that has distributed over 13,600 samples and became largely self-sustaining; (ii) conservatively leveraging $43.8 M (s.a.$20.5 M - $160.5 M) in funding and support from the initial $9.7 M investment; (iii) contributing to clinical practice guidelines and securing a patent for identification of stem cells for endometrial cell regeneration; (iv) shifting the treatment paradigm for all tumour types that rely on nerve cell innervation, (v) development and implementation of the world’s first real-time patient treatment verification system (Watchdog); (vi) inventing the effective ‘EAT’ psychological intervention to improve nutrition and outcomes in people experiencing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer; (vi) developing effective interventions to reduce smoking rates among priority groups, currently being rolled out to disadvantaged populations in NSW; and (vii) establishing a Consumer Advisory Panel and Consumer Engagement Committee to increase consumer involvement in research.

Conclusion

Using FAIT methodology, we have demonstrated the significant impact and downstream benefits that can be achieved by the provision of infrastructure-type funding to regional and rural research collaboratives to help address inequities in research activity and health outcomes and demonstrates a positive return on investment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global Cancer observatory: Cancer today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global Cancer observatory: Cancer today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020.
2.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian burden of disease study: impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2018 - summary report. Canberra, Australia: AIHW; 2021. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian burden of disease study: impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2018 - summary report. Canberra, Australia: AIHW; 2021.
4.
go back to reference Bergin RJ, Emery J, Bollard RC, Falborg AZ, Jensen H, Weller D, et al. Rural–Urban Disparities in Time to Diagnosis and Treatment for Colorectal and Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27(9):1036–46.CrossRefPubMed Bergin RJ, Emery J, Bollard RC, Falborg AZ, Jensen H, Weller D, et al. Rural–Urban Disparities in Time to Diagnosis and Treatment for Colorectal and Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27(9):1036–46.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2021. Canberra, Australia: AIHW; 2021. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2021. Canberra, Australia: AIHW; 2021.
6.
go back to reference Slattery P, Saeri AK, Bragge P. Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):1–13.CrossRef Slattery P, Saeri AK, Bragge P. Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):1–13.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Halpern MT, Spain P, Holden DJ, Stewart A, McNamara EJ, Gay G, et al. Improving quality of cancer care at community hospitals: impact of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer centers program pilot. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9(6):e298–304.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Halpern MT, Spain P, Holden DJ, Stewart A, McNamara EJ, Gay G, et al. Improving quality of cancer care at community hospitals: impact of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer centers program pilot. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9(6):e298–304.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Calvo F, Apolone G, Baumann M, Caldas C, Celis JE, de Lorenzo F, et al. Cancer Core Europe: a European cancer research alliance realizing a research infrastructure with critical mass and programmatic approach to cure cancer in the 21st century. Eur J Cancer. 2018;103:155–9.CrossRefPubMed Calvo F, Apolone G, Baumann M, Caldas C, Celis JE, de Lorenzo F, et al. Cancer Core Europe: a European cancer research alliance realizing a research infrastructure with critical mass and programmatic approach to cure cancer in the 21st century. Eur J Cancer. 2018;103:155–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Anderson WP, Papadakis EM. Research to improve health practice and policy. MJA. 2009;191(11):646–7.PubMed Anderson WP, Papadakis EM. Research to improve health practice and policy. MJA. 2009;191(11):646–7.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cooksey D. A review of UK health research funding. Norwich, UK: The Stationary Office; 2006. Cooksey D. A review of UK health research funding. Norwich, UK: The Stationary Office; 2006.
11.
go back to reference National Health and Medical Research Council. Report of the review of public Health Research funding in Australia. Australia: Canberra; 2009. National Health and Medical Research Council. Report of the review of public Health Research funding in Australia. Australia: Canberra; 2009.
12.
go back to reference Australian Governement Department of Health and Aging. Strategic review of health and medical research in Australia - better health through research. Australia: Canberra; 2013. Australian Governement Department of Health and Aging. Strategic review of health and medical research in Australia - better health through research. Australia: Canberra; 2013.
13.
go back to reference Australian medical research advisory board. Medical research future fund: Australian medical research and innovation strategy 2016–2021. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia,; 2016 9 November 2020. Australian medical research advisory board. Medical research future fund: Australian medical research and innovation strategy 2016–2021. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia,; 2016 9 November 2020.
14.
go back to reference Milat AJ, Bauman AE, Redman S. A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13(1):1–7.CrossRef Milat AJ, Bauman AE, Redman S. A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13(1):1–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Searles A, Doran C, Attia J, Knight D, Wiggers J, Deeming S, et al. An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):1–13.CrossRef Searles A, Doran C, Attia J, Knight D, Wiggers J, Deeming S, et al. An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):1–13.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Donovan C, Hanney S. The ‘payback framework’explained. Res Eval. 2011;20(3):181–3.CrossRef Donovan C, Hanney S. The ‘payback framework’explained. Res Eval. 2011;20(3):181–3.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hanna CR, Gatting LP, Boyd KA, Robb KA, Jones RJ. Evidencing the impact of cancer trials: insights from the 2014 UK research excellence framework. Trials. 2020;21(1):1–13.CrossRef Hanna CR, Gatting LP, Boyd KA, Robb KA, Jones RJ. Evidencing the impact of cancer trials: insights from the 2014 UK research excellence framework. Trials. 2020;21(1):1–13.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hanna CR, Boyd KA, Jones RJ. Evaluating cancer research impact: lessons and examples from existing reviews on approaches to research impact assessment. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):1–45.CrossRef Hanna CR, Boyd KA, Jones RJ. Evaluating cancer research impact: lessons and examples from existing reviews on approaches to research impact assessment. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):1–45.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Buxton MJ, Hanney S. Developing and applying the payback framework to assess the socioeconomic impact of health research. Med Clin (Barc). 2008;131:36–41.CrossRefPubMed Buxton MJ, Hanney S. Developing and applying the payback framework to assess the socioeconomic impact of health research. Med Clin (Barc). 2008;131:36–41.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Saloman J, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford Academic; 2016.CrossRef Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Saloman J, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford Academic; 2016.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Syed SM, Kumar M, Ghosh A, Tomasetig F, Ali A, Whan RM, et al. Endometrial Axin2+ cells drive epithelial homeostasis, regeneration, and Cancer following oncogenic transformation. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26(1):64–80.e13.CrossRefPubMed Syed SM, Kumar M, Ghosh A, Tomasetig F, Ali A, Whan RM, et al. Endometrial Axin2+ cells drive epithelial homeostasis, regeneration, and Cancer following oncogenic transformation. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26(1):64–80.e13.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference March B, Faulkner S, Jobling P, Steigler A, Blatt A, Denham J, et al. Tumour innervation and neurosignalling in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2020;17(2):119–30.CrossRefPubMed March B, Faulkner S, Jobling P, Steigler A, Blatt A, Denham J, et al. Tumour innervation and neurosignalling in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2020;17(2):119–30.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Fuangrod T, Greer PB, Woodruff HC, Simpson J, Bhatia S, Zwan B, et al. Investigation of a real-time EPID-based patient dose monitoring safety system using site-specific control limits. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11(1):1–10. Fuangrod T, Greer PB, Woodruff HC, Simpson J, Bhatia S, Zwan B, et al. Investigation of a real-time EPID-based patient dose monitoring safety system using site-specific control limits. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11(1):1–10.
25.
go back to reference Lim S, Tsai C, Yu Y, Greer P, Fuangrod T, Hwang K, et al. Investigation of a novel decision support metric for head and neck adaptive radiation therapy using a real-time in vivo portal dosimetry system. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:1533033819873629.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim S, Tsai C, Yu Y, Greer P, Fuangrod T, Hwang K, et al. Investigation of a novel decision support metric for head and neck adaptive radiation therapy using a real-time in vivo portal dosimetry system. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:1533033819873629.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Woodruff HC, Fuangrod T, Van Uytven E, McCurdy BM, van Beek T, Bhatia S, et al. First experience with real-time EPID-based delivery verification during IMRT and VMAT sessions. IJROBP. 2015;93(3):516–22. Woodruff HC, Fuangrod T, Van Uytven E, McCurdy BM, van Beek T, Bhatia S, et al. First experience with real-time EPID-based delivery verification during IMRT and VMAT sessions. IJROBP. 2015;93(3):516–22.
27.
go back to reference Britton B, Baker AL, Wolfenden L, Wratten C, Bauer J, Beck AK, et al. Eating as treatment (EAT): a stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial of a health behavior change intervention provided by dietitians to improve nutrition in patients with head and neck Cancer undergoing radiation therapy (TROG 12.03). IJROBP. 2019;103(2):353–62. Britton B, Baker AL, Wolfenden L, Wratten C, Bauer J, Beck AK, et al. Eating as treatment (EAT): a stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial of a health behavior change intervention provided by dietitians to improve nutrition in patients with head and neck Cancer undergoing radiation therapy (TROG 12.03). IJROBP. 2019;103(2):353–62.
28.
go back to reference Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Bauer MS, Kirchner J. Implementation science: what is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112376.CrossRefPubMed Bauer MS, Kirchner J. Implementation science: what is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112376.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Cancer Institute NSW. What works best when establishing a translational cancer research Centre: final research report. Sydney, Australia: CINSW; 2015. Cancer Institute NSW. What works best when establishing a translational cancer research Centre: final research report. Sydney, Australia: CINSW; 2015.
Metadata
Title
The impact of a regionally based translational cancer research collaborative in Australia using the FAIT methodology
Authors
Christine L. Paul
Nicole M. Verrills
Stephen Ackland
Rodney Scott
Susan Goode
Ann Thomas
Sarah Lukeman
Sarah Nielsen
Judith Weidenhofer
James Lynam
Elizabeth A. Fradgley
Jarad Martin
Peter Greer
Stephen Smith
Cassandra Griffin
Kelly A. Avery-Kiejda
Nick Zdenkowski
Andrew Searles
Shanthi Ramanathan
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10680-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Health Services Research 1/2024 Go to the issue