Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 3/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Paper

The hounsfield unit value calculated with the aid of non-contrast computed tomography and its effect on the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Authors: Alper Gok, Haci Polat, Ali Cift, Mehmet Ozgur Yucel, Bahri Gok, Mehmet Sirik, Can Benlioglu, Bedreddin Kalyenci

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of the Hounsfield unit (HU) value, calculated with the aid of non-contrast computed tomography, on the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Data for 83 patients evaluated in our clinic between November 2011 and February 2014 that had similar stone sizes, localizations, and radio opacities were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were grouped according to their HU value, in a low HU group (HU ≤ 1000) or a high HU group (HU > 1000). The two groups were compared based on their PCNL success rates, complications, duration of surgery, duration of fluoroscopy, and decrease in the hematocrit. There were no significant differences in terms of mean age, female-male ratio, or mean body mass index between the two groups (p > 0.05). The stone size and stone surface area did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.820 and p = 0.394, respectively). The unsuccessful PCNL rate and the prevalence of complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05). The duration of surgery, duration of fluoroscopy, and decrease in the hematocrit were significantly greater in the high HU group compared to the low HU group (p < 0.001). Calculating the HU value using this imaging method may predict cases with longer surgery durations, longer fluoroscopy durations, and greater decreases in hematocrite levels, but this value is not related to the success rate of PCNL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lojanapiwat B (2006) Previous open nephrolithotomy: does it affect percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques and outcome? J Endourol 20:17–20CrossRefPubMed Lojanapiwat B (2006) Previous open nephrolithotomy: does it affect percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques and outcome? J Endourol 20:17–20CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ et al (1985) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1000 cases. J Urol 134:1077–1081PubMed Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ et al (1985) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1000 cases. J Urol 134:1077–1081PubMed
3.
go back to reference Gok A, Gunes ZE, Cift A et al (2013) Factors influencing success rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Ankara Med J 13:57–61 Gok A, Gunes ZE, Cift A et al (2013) Factors influencing success rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Ankara Med J 13:57–61
4.
go back to reference Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette JJ (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy. Eur Urol 47:22–28CrossRefPubMed Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette JJ (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy. Eur Urol 47:22–28CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Turna B, Umul M, Demiryoguran S et al (2007) How do increasing stone surface area and stone configuration affect overall outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 21:34–43CrossRefPubMed Turna B, Umul M, Demiryoguran S et al (2007) How do increasing stone surface area and stone configuration affect overall outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 21:34–43CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Golwasser B, Weinerth JL, Carson CC (1986) Factors affecting the success rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the incidence of retained fragments. J Urol 136:358–360 Golwasser B, Weinerth JL, Carson CC (1986) Factors affecting the success rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the incidence of retained fragments. J Urol 136:358–360
7.
go back to reference Sofikerim M, Demirci D, Gülmez I et al (2007) Does previous open nephrolithotomy affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 21:401–403CrossRefPubMed Sofikerim M, Demirci D, Gülmez I et al (2007) Does previous open nephrolithotomy affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 21:401–403CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Binbay M, Istanbulluoglu O, Sofikerim M et al (2011) Effect of simple malrotation on percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a matched pair multicenter analysis. J Urol 185:1737–1741CrossRefPubMed Binbay M, Istanbulluoglu O, Sofikerim M et al (2011) Effect of simple malrotation on percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a matched pair multicenter analysis. J Urol 185:1737–1741CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O et al (2007) A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. EurUrol 51:1688–1693 El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O et al (2007) A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. EurUrol 51:1688–1693
10.
go back to reference Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK et al (2002) Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? J Urol 167:1968–1971CrossRefPubMed Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK et al (2002) Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? J Urol 167:1968–1971CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Fracchina JA (2003) Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 169:1679–1681CrossRefPubMed Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Fracchina JA (2003) Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 169:1679–1681CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Panagopoulos G et al (2005) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units. Urology 65:33–36CrossRefPubMed Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Panagopoulos G et al (2005) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units. Urology 65:33–36CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT Jr et al (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66:941–944CrossRefPubMed Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT Jr et al (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66:941–944CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gupta NP, Ansari MS, Kesarvani P et al (2005) Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for urinary calculi. BJU Int 95:1285–1288CrossRefPubMed Gupta NP, Ansari MS, Kesarvani P et al (2005) Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for urinary calculi. BJU Int 95:1285–1288CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wang L, Wong Y, Chuang C et al (2005) Prediction of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis. Eur Radiol 15:2238–2243CrossRefPubMed Wang L, Wong Y, Chuang C et al (2005) Prediction of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis. Eur Radiol 15:2238–2243CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H et al (2012) Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 26:1125–1130CrossRefPubMed Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H et al (2012) Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 26:1125–1130CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al (2014) Guidelines on urolithiasis: European Association of Urology Guidelines, p 44 Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al (2014) Guidelines on urolithiasis: European Association of Urology Guidelines, p 44
18.
go back to reference Friedman MT, Ebrahim A (2006) Adequacy of physician documentation of red blood cell transfusion and correlation with assessment of transfusion appropriateness. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:474–479PubMed Friedman MT, Ebrahim A (2006) Adequacy of physician documentation of red blood cell transfusion and correlation with assessment of transfusion appropriateness. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:474–479PubMed
19.
go back to reference Sutchin RP, Haleblian G, Zabbo A et al (2009) Hounsfield units on computed tomography predict calcium stone subtype composition. Urol Int 83:175–180CrossRef Sutchin RP, Haleblian G, Zabbo A et al (2009) Hounsfield units on computed tomography predict calcium stone subtype composition. Urol Int 83:175–180CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Saw KC, McAteer JA, Fineberg NS et al (2000) Calcium stone fragility is predicted by helical CT attenuation values. J Endourol 14:471–474CrossRefPubMed Saw KC, McAteer JA, Fineberg NS et al (2000) Calcium stone fragility is predicted by helical CT attenuation values. J Endourol 14:471–474CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gücük A, Uyetürk U, Oztürk U et al (2012) Does the Hounsfield unit value determined by computed tomography predict the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 26:792–796CrossRefPubMed Gücük A, Uyetürk U, Oztürk U et al (2012) Does the Hounsfield unit value determined by computed tomography predict the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 26:792–796CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The hounsfield unit value calculated with the aid of non-contrast computed tomography and its effect on the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Authors
Alper Gok
Haci Polat
Ali Cift
Mehmet Ozgur Yucel
Bahri Gok
Mehmet Sirik
Can Benlioglu
Bedreddin Kalyenci
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0766-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Urolithiasis 3/2015 Go to the issue