Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 11/2017

Open Access 01-11-2017 | Letter to the Editor

The first-generation ABSORB BVS: awaiting dissolving outcomes

Authors: J. Elias, I. M. van Dongen, J. P. S. Henriques

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

We thank Dr Shah for his response to our meta-analysis. As Dr Shah points out, in our meta-analysis the ABSORB II trial was the only study that reported 3‑year follow-up. All the other trials had a follow-up duration of 2 years or less, and the AIDA trial reported a median follow-up of 2 years [1]. Therefore, the very-long-term clinical efficacy and safety of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) are currently unknown. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elias J, van Dongen IM, Kraak RP, et al. Mid-term and long-term safety and efficacy of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic everolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: a weighted meta-analysis of seven randomised controlled trials including 5577 patients. Neth Heart J. 2017;25:429–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elias J, van Dongen IM, Kraak RP, et al. Mid-term and long-term safety and efficacy of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic everolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: a weighted meta-analysis of seven randomised controlled trials including 5577 patients. Neth Heart J. 2017;25:429–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Gao R. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular Scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: 3‑year clinical outcomes from ABSORB China. Presented at: annual EuroPCR conference; May 17, 2017; Paris, France. 2017. https://www.tctmd.com/slide/randomized-comparison everolimus- eluting-bioresorbable-vascular-scaffolds-vs-everolimus. Accessed 10 Aug 2017. Gao R. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular Scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: 3‑year clinical outcomes from ABSORB China. Presented at: annual EuroPCR conference; May 17, 2017; Paris, France. 2017. https://​www.​tctmd.​com/​slide/​randomized-comparison everolimus- eluting-bioresorbable-vascular-scaffolds-vs-everolimus. Accessed 10 Aug 2017.
4.
go back to reference Serruys PW, Chevalier B, Sotomi Y, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2479–91.CrossRefPubMed Serruys PW, Chevalier B, Sotomi Y, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2479–91.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The first-generation ABSORB BVS: awaiting dissolving outcomes
Authors
J. Elias
I. M. van Dongen
J. P. S. Henriques
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-017-1042-8

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Netherlands Heart Journal 11/2017 Go to the issue