Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 1/2018

Open Access 01-02-2018 | Original Research

The Cost-effectiveness of Dulaglutide 1.5mg versus Exenatide QW for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in France

Authors: Mickael Basson, Dionysios Ntais, Ruba Ayyub, Donna Wright, Julia Lowin, Florence Chartier, Stéphane Roze, Kirsi Norrbacka

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Dulaglutide is a novel onceweekly administered glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this analysis was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus exenatide QW for the management of T2DM in France.

Methods

The QuintilesIMS CORE Diabetes Model was used to estimate the expected lifetime direct medical costs and outcomes of T2DM from the perspective of the French National Health Service. In the absence of head-to-head data, relative efficacy was derived from a network meta-analysis. Patient cohort characteristics were derived from the AWARD-2 trial. All patients were assumed to remain on treatment for 2 years before escalating to insulin therapy. Costs included treatment costs and costs associated with long-term complications of T2DM. Utilities were estimated based on a recent systematic review. One-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) were generated.

Results

Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was associated with lower costs (lifetime costs €41,562 vs €43,021) and increased health benefits (lifetime quality-adjusted life years: QALYs 9.804 vs 9.757) versus exenatide QW for the treatment of T2DM in France. OWSA and PSA indicated that results were robust across a range of plausible input parameters. The CEAC indicated a 99.5% probability that dulaglutide would be considered cost-effective at a willingness to pay of €30,000.

Conclusion

Dulaglutide 1.5 mg reduced expected costs and increased expected QALYs when compared against exenatide QW for the treatment of T2DM in France. Compared with exenatide QW, dulaglutide 1.5 mg can provide additional health benefits for patients with T2DM and may result in cost savings for payers.

Funding

Eli Lilly.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Facts and figures: the challenge of diabetes. Copenhagen: WHO Europe; 2015. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Facts and figures: the challenge of diabetes. Copenhagen: WHO Europe; 2015.
3.
go back to reference UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–53.CrossRef UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–53.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(5):383–93.CrossRefPubMed Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(5):383–93.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Almdal T, Scharling H, Jensen JS, Vestergaard H. The independent effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on ischemic heart disease, stroke, and death: a population-based study of 13,000 men and women with 20 years of follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(13):1422–6.CrossRefPubMed Almdal T, Scharling H, Jensen JS, Vestergaard H. The independent effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on ischemic heart disease, stroke, and death: a population-based study of 13,000 men and women with 20 years of follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(13):1422–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Roper NA, Bilous RW, Kelly WF, Unwin NC, Connolly VM. Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population based study. BMJ. 2001;322(7299):1389–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roper NA, Bilous RW, Kelly WF, Unwin NC, Connolly VM. Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population based study. BMJ. 2001;322(7299):1389–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Chevreul K, Brigham KB, Bouche C. The burden and treatment of diabetes in France. Global Health. 2014;10(1):1.CrossRef Chevreul K, Brigham KB, Bouche C. The burden and treatment of diabetes in France. Global Health. 2014;10(1):1.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wysham C, Blevins T, Arakaki R, Colon G, Garcia P, Atisso C, et al. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):1259–2167.CrossRef Wysham C, Blevins T, Arakaki R, Colon G, Garcia P, Atisso C, et al. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):1259–2167.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dungan KM, Povedano ST, Forst T, Gonzalez JGG, Atisso C, Sealls W, et al. Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9951):1349–57.CrossRefPubMed Dungan KM, Povedano ST, Forst T, Gonzalez JGG, Atisso C, Sealls W, et al. Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9951):1349–57.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Giorgino F, Benroubi M, Sun JH, Zimmermann AG, Pechtner V. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin and glimepiride (AWARD-2). Diabetes Care. 2015;38(12):2241–9.CrossRefPubMed Giorgino F, Benroubi M, Sun JH, Zimmermann AG, Pechtner V. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin and glimepiride (AWARD-2). Diabetes Care. 2015;38(12):2241–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Umpierrez G, Tofe PS, Perez MF, Shurzinske L, Pechtner V. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2168–76.CrossRefPubMed Umpierrez G, Tofe PS, Perez MF, Shurzinske L, Pechtner V. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2168–76.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Blonde L, Jendle J, Gross J, Woo V, Jiang H, Fahrbach JL, et al. Once-weekly dulaglutide versus bedtime insulin glargine, both in combination with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study. Lancet. 2015;385(9982):2057–66.CrossRefPubMed Blonde L, Jendle J, Gross J, Woo V, Jiang H, Fahrbach JL, et al. Once-weekly dulaglutide versus bedtime insulin glargine, both in combination with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study. Lancet. 2015;385(9982):2057–66.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nauck M, Weinstock RS, Umpierrez GE, Guerci B, Skrivanek Z, Milicevic Z. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 52 weeks in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-5). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2149–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nauck M, Weinstock RS, Umpierrez GE, Guerci B, Skrivanek Z, Milicevic Z. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 52 weeks in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-5). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2149–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference IMS Health Ltd. SMART—Global MIDAS edition: market share data for GLP-1 molecules in France. Milton Keynes: IMS Health Ltd.; 2016. IMS Health Ltd. SMART—Global MIDAS edition: market share data for GLP-1 molecules in France. Milton Keynes: IMS Health Ltd.; 2016.
16.
go back to reference Eli Lilly and Company. Network meta analysis based on publicly available information on type 2 diabetes medications (data analysis on file). Indianapolis: Eli Lilly and Company; 2014. Eli Lilly and Company. Network meta analysis based on publicly available information on type 2 diabetes medications (data analysis on file). Indianapolis: Eli Lilly and Company; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Grant D, Foos V, Palmer J, Lloyd A, Evans M, McEwan P. Long-term validation of the IMS CORE Diabetes Model in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Presented at 72nd Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012 June 8–12. Grant D, Foos V, Palmer J, Lloyd A, Evans M, McEwan P. Long-term validation of the IMS CORE Diabetes Model in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Presented at 72nd Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012 June 8–12.
19.
go back to reference McEwan P, Foos V, Palmer JL, Lamotte M, Lloyd A, Grant D. Validation of the IMS CORE diabetes model. Value Health. 2014;17(6):714–24.CrossRefPubMed McEwan P, Foos V, Palmer JL, Lamotte M, Lloyd A, Grant D. Validation of the IMS CORE diabetes model. Value Health. 2014;17(6):714–24.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, Minshall ME, Foos V, Lurati FM, et al. The CORE diabetes model: projecting long-term clinical outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions in diabetes mellitus (types 1 and 2) to support clinical and reimbursement decision-making. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(Suppl 1):S5–26.CrossRefPubMed Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, Minshall ME, Foos V, Lurati FM, et al. The CORE diabetes model: projecting long-term clinical outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions in diabetes mellitus (types 1 and 2) to support clinical and reimbursement decision-making. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(Suppl 1):S5–26.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, Minshall ME, Foos V, Lurati FM, et al. Validation of the CORE Diabetes Model against epidemiological and clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(Suppl 1):S27–40.CrossRefPubMed Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, Minshall ME, Foos V, Lurati FM, et al. Validation of the CORE Diabetes Model against epidemiological and clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(Suppl 1):S27–40.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hornberger J. Computer modeling of diabetes and its complications: a report on the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting. Value Health. 2013;16(4):453–4. Hornberger J. Computer modeling of diabetes and its complications: a report on the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting. Value Health. 2013;16(4):453–4.
26.
go back to reference NICE. Type 2 diabetes: newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes. London: NICE; 2009. NICE. Type 2 diabetes: newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes. London: NICE; 2009.
28.
go back to reference Buse JB, Nauck M, Forst T, Sheu WH, Shenouda SK, Heilmann CR, et al. Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):117–24.CrossRefPubMed Buse JB, Nauck M, Forst T, Sheu WH, Shenouda SK, Heilmann CR, et al. Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):117–24.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference World Health Organisation. WHO ATC/DDD index. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Accessed 27 Nov 2015. World Health Organisation. WHO ATC/DDD index. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Accessed 27 Nov 2015.
32.
go back to reference Divino V, DeKoven M, Hallinan S, Varol N, Wirta SB, Lee WC, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment patterns among type 2 diabetes patients in six European countries. Diabetes Ther. 2014;5(2):499–520. Divino V, DeKoven M, Hallinan S, Varol N, Wirta SB, Lee WC, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment patterns among type 2 diabetes patients in six European countries. Diabetes Ther. 2014;5(2):499–520.
33.
go back to reference Levin PA, Wei W, Zhou S, Xie L, Baser O. Outcomes and treatment patterns of adding a third agent to 2 OADs in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014;20(5):501–12.PubMed Levin PA, Wei W, Zhou S, Xie L, Baser O. Outcomes and treatment patterns of adding a third agent to 2 OADs in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014;20(5):501–12.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Beaudet A, Clegg J, Thuresson PO, Lloyd A, McEwan P. Review of utility values for economic modeling in type 2 diabetes. Value Health. 2014;17(4):462–70.CrossRefPubMed Beaudet A, Clegg J, Thuresson PO, Lloyd A, McEwan P. Review of utility values for economic modeling in type 2 diabetes. Value Health. 2014;17(4):462–70.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Matza LS, Boye KS, Yurgin N, Brewster-Jordan J, Mannix S, Shorr JM, et al. Utilities and disutilities for type 2 diabetes treatment-related attributes. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(7):1251–65.CrossRefPubMed Matza LS, Boye KS, Yurgin N, Brewster-Jordan J, Mannix S, Shorr JM, et al. Utilities and disutilities for type 2 diabetes treatment-related attributes. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(7):1251–65.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Boye KS, Matza LS, Walter KN, Van BK, Palsgrove AC, Tynan A. Utilities and disutilities for attributes of injectable treatments for type 2 diabetes. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(3):219–30.CrossRefPubMed Boye KS, Matza LS, Walter KN, Van BK, Palsgrove AC, Tynan A. Utilities and disutilities for attributes of injectable treatments for type 2 diabetes. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(3):219–30.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Owens D, Barnett A, Pickup J. Blood glucose self-monitoring in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: reaching a multidisciplinary consensus. Diabetes Prim Care. 2004;6(1):8–19. Owens D, Barnett A, Pickup J. Blood glucose self-monitoring in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: reaching a multidisciplinary consensus. Diabetes Prim Care. 2004;6(1):8–19.
39.
go back to reference Comité économique des produits de santé (CEPS) (2015) Prix des medicaments. Paris: Ministère des Affaires et de la Santé; 2015. (1-2-2016). Comité économique des produits de santé (CEPS) (2015) Prix des medicaments. Paris: Ministère des Affaires et de la Santé; 2015. (1-2-2016).
41.
go back to reference Ghatnekar O, Willis M, Persson U. Cost-effectiveness of treating deep diabetic foot ulcers with promogran in four European countries. J Wound Care. 2002;11(2):70–4. Ghatnekar O, Willis M, Persson U. Cost-effectiveness of treating deep diabetic foot ulcers with promogran in four European countries. J Wound Care. 2002;11(2):70–4.
42.
go back to reference Girod I, Valensi P, Laforet C, Moreau-Defarges T, Guillon P, Baron F. An economic evaluation of the cost of diabetic foot ulcers: results of a retrospective study on 239 patients. Diabetes Metab. 2003;29(3):269–77.CrossRefPubMed Girod I, Valensi P, Laforet C, Moreau-Defarges T, Guillon P, Baron F. An economic evaluation of the cost of diabetic foot ulcers: results of a retrospective study on 239 patients. Diabetes Metab. 2003;29(3):269–77.CrossRefPubMed
47.
48.
go back to reference Roussel R, Martinez L, Vandebrouck T, Douik H, Emiel P, Guery M et al. Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes in France. J Med Econ 2016;19:121–34. Roussel R, Martinez L, Vandebrouck T, Douik H, Emiel P, Guery M et al. Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes in France. J Med Econ 2016;19:121–34.
49.
go back to reference Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, Scott DA, Itzler R, Cappelleri JC, et al. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value Health. 2011;14(4):429–37.CrossRefPubMed Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, Scott DA, Itzler R, Cappelleri JC, et al. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value Health. 2011;14(4):429–37.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, Itzler R, Barrett A, Hawkins N, et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. Value Health. 2011;14(4):417–28.CrossRefPubMed Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, Itzler R, Barrett A, Hawkins N, et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. Value Health. 2011;14(4):417–28.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Cost-effectiveness of Dulaglutide 1.5mg versus Exenatide QW for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in France
Authors
Mickael Basson
Dionysios Ntais
Ruba Ayyub
Donna Wright
Julia Lowin
Florence Chartier
Stéphane Roze
Kirsi Norrbacka
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0321-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Diabetes Therapy 1/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.