Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Rhinology

The comparison of the quality of life and intranasal edema between the patients with or without nasal packing after septoplasty

Authors: B. Kayahan, S. Ozer, A. E. Suslu, O. Ogretmenoglu, M. Onerci

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Septoplasty is one of the most common operations performed in otolaryngology and anterior nasal packing is done routinely to prevent postoperative bleeding, septal hematoma or nasal synechia. Currently, transseptal sutures have gained a broader application area, not only for preventing the complications such as septal hematoma and bleeding but also closing any accidental tears of septal mucosa and providing additional support for the cartilage pieces retained in septoplasty. We evaluated the quality of life of the patients in early postoperative period (in the first postoperative week), intranasal edema with endoscopic examination and the intranasal changes with acoustic rhinometry. We performed a prospective and randomized study with patients undergoing septoplasty without inferior turbinectomy. As packing material, there were two groups: in group A, gauze in a glove finger and in group B, Doyle splint were used, and in the additional group C, only transseptal suture with 4/0 vicryl among the cartilaginous septum was performed. The patients were invited to control examinations on the postoperative 2nd, 4th and 7th days to evaluate the scores from 1 to 5 on the questionnaire for the pain, nasal fullness, sneezing, epiphora, difficulty in swallowing and sleep disturbances. The patients were also administered an endoscopic nasal examination for the purpose of detecting the intranasal edema, and acoustic rhinometry was performed during the control examinations to detect the intranasal changes. Total occluding packing was found to cause much more frequent and higher scores of epiphora, sneezing, difficulty in swallowing, but mainly, the pain compared to in silicone packing with airway and transseptal suture only. Although the silicone packing with airway was found to be much more comfortable, it also led to sneezing and epiphora. The patients without nasal packing had more comfortable period especially in the early postoperative days (the first 4 days). However, 1 week after surgery, groups with and without nasal packing were found to be equalized on behalf of the objective and subjective parameters. As any complication was not observed due to not using nasal packing, it is thought that nasal packing usage following septoplasty is not a necessity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bernardo MT, Alves S, Lima NB, Helena D, Condé A (2013) Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 79(4):471–474CrossRefPubMed Bernardo MT, Alves S, Lima NB, Helena D, Condé A (2013) Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 79(4):471–474CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Basavaraj N, Walikar S, Rashinkar MS, Kakkeri A (2011) A comparative study of septoplasty with or without nasal packing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 63(3):247–248CrossRef Basavaraj N, Walikar S, Rashinkar MS, Kakkeri A (2011) A comparative study of septoplasty with or without nasal packing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 63(3):247–248CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gunaydin RO, Aygenc E, Karakullukcu S, Fidan F, Celikkanat S (2011) Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(8):1151–1156CrossRefPubMed Gunaydin RO, Aygenc E, Karakullukcu S, Fidan F, Celikkanat S (2011) Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(8):1151–1156CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S (2009) Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(10):1022–1024CrossRefPubMed Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S (2009) Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(10):1022–1024CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Acıoğlu E, Edizer DT, Yiğit Ö, Onur F, Alkan Z (2012) Nasal septal packing: which one? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(7):1777–1781CrossRefPubMed Acıoğlu E, Edizer DT, Yiğit Ö, Onur F, Alkan Z (2012) Nasal septal packing: which one? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(7):1777–1781CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gioacchini FM, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Kaleci S, Magliulo G, Re M (2014) The role of antibiotic therapy and nasal packing in septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271(5):879–886CrossRefPubMed Gioacchini FM, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Kaleci S, Magliulo G, Re M (2014) The role of antibiotic therapy and nasal packing in septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271(5):879–886CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cayonu M, Acar A, Horasanlı E, Altundag A, Salihoglu M (2014) Comparison of totally occlusive nasal pack, internal nasal splint, and transseptal suture technique after septoplasty in terms of immediate respiratory distress related to anesthesia and surgical complications. Acta Otolaryngol 134(4):390–394CrossRefPubMed Cayonu M, Acar A, Horasanlı E, Altundag A, Salihoglu M (2014) Comparison of totally occlusive nasal pack, internal nasal splint, and transseptal suture technique after septoplasty in terms of immediate respiratory distress related to anesthesia and surgical complications. Acta Otolaryngol 134(4):390–394CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cukurova I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC, Demirhan E, Gumussoy M (2012) Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 32(2):111–114PubMedPubMedCentral Cukurova I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC, Demirhan E, Gumussoy M (2012) Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 32(2):111–114PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Ogretmenoglu O, Yilmaz T, Rahimi K, Aksöyek S (2002) The effect on arterial blood gases and heart rate of bilateral nasal packing. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259(2):63–66CrossRefPubMed Ogretmenoglu O, Yilmaz T, Rahimi K, Aksöyek S (2002) The effect on arterial blood gases and heart rate of bilateral nasal packing. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259(2):63–66CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Korkut AY, Erkalp K, Erden V, Teker AM, Demirel A, Gedikli O, Saidoglu L (2010) Effect of pharyngeal packing during nasal surgery on postoperative nausea and vomiting. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143(6):831–836CrossRefPubMed Korkut AY, Erkalp K, Erden V, Teker AM, Demirel A, Gedikli O, Saidoglu L (2010) Effect of pharyngeal packing during nasal surgery on postoperative nausea and vomiting. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143(6):831–836CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Naghibzadeh B, Peyvandi AA, Naghibzadeh G (2011) Does post septoplasty nasal packing reduce complications? Acta Med Iran 49(1):9–12PubMed Naghibzadeh B, Peyvandi AA, Naghibzadeh G (2011) Does post septoplasty nasal packing reduce complications? Acta Med Iran 49(1):9–12PubMed
13.
go back to reference Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F, Draf W, Toffel PH (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22(5):306–320CrossRefPubMed Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F, Draf W, Toffel PH (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22(5):306–320CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tomori Z, Widdicombe JG (1969) Muscular, bronchomotor and cardiovascular reflexes elicited by mechanical stimulation of the respiratory tract. J Physiol 200(1):25–49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tomori Z, Widdicombe JG (1969) Muscular, bronchomotor and cardiovascular reflexes elicited by mechanical stimulation of the respiratory tract. J Physiol 200(1):25–49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The comparison of the quality of life and intranasal edema between the patients with or without nasal packing after septoplasty
Authors
B. Kayahan
S. Ozer
A. E. Suslu
O. Ogretmenoglu
M. Onerci
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4403-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2017 Go to the issue